Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur
ok i don't know the exact Catholic theology on Original Sin, but as a Lutheran i have never understood original sin to just disappear when someone is baptized. Original sin is still present, just through the Holy Spirit a person is put in communion with God and thus the hold is broken. The gift of Holy Spirit is received through the water of baptism just like Christ received the spirit when he was baptized.
Now that being said the key phrase is "through the Holy Spirit." While being baptized is the best way to receive the Holy spirit I am not willing to rule out the possibility that the unbaptized can receive the Holy Spirit too. As I say so often this is something God knows and we can't. So i don't think he is actually canceling the doctrine.
|
The original sin is that of Adam, of his choice to go against the law of God. As all of us descend from Adam (from creationist theory), we all suffer the consequences of Adam's sin - just as one inherits brown eyes from their parents, so do they inherit the sin of Adam (per St. Augustine, if I remember catechism...it's been a long time). The consequence of this original sin is death. So, even with baptism, one suffers the consequence of this original sin.
Infants who die before baptism go to Limbo (not Purgatory since there is no volution in infants, thus no need for final purification) where they live in natural hapiness rather than eternal happiness. The only difference is that eternal happiness is one step above natural happiness in that it includes communion with God (Heaven).
Thus, fundamentally I see no difference between the protestant view that baptism brings one into communion with God and that of the Roman Catholic view.
Having been indoctrinated as a Roman Catholic, I believe in having infants baptised - hedge your bets and get all the grace points you can

. However, even though I was indoctrinated as a Roman Catholic, I've always had a hard time getting my head around the original sin/death/baptism. For instance, we get baptised to be forgiven of the original sin yet we still suffer the consequence of that sin? And...there really is no difference between the RC views of baptism and that of those horrible protestants (that comes from being indoctrinated as an
Irish Catholic...

)
The doctrine that unbaptised babies only make it to Limbo has been a controversy for centuries. Even in our
thick set of scriptures, it is never formally discussed. So, I'm OK with the Vatican re-examining this and I'm glad that the theological scholars associated with the Church continue to examine and re-examine doctrine. Also, the Vatican is probably one of the best organizations at marketing in all of time. Since the ramifications of the original sin have been iffy for centuries AND since the Vatican sees RC numbers decreasing (esp. in Europe), this was an easy doctrine to ease up on to draw and/or keep more numbers in the Church.
...and...I'm 100% with you. Only God determines who is in grace with Him.