Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Humanities Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Humanities Issues Religion, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 21,731

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Maybe it was done simply for brevity.

To suggest that he has no respect for christians, though? How Kreskin-like...
Maybe he meant no disrespect and I'm willing to give the benefit of doubt, but I've had run-ins with atheists over the use of "X" and they admitted they used it disrespectfully.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Dilettante's Avatar
Dilettante Dilettante is offline
Secretary of Defense
Hoping to one day be a Secretary of Offense.

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,595

Pennsylvania     United_States

Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josepha View Post
I think it is only Xtians who say they have the only answer - and it is only some Xtian churches. Can anyone else find a religion that says it? I've eliminated Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Unitarian, Bahaii - anyone know of any other religion that says it is the only path to heaven?
I'm quite sure how you've "eliminated" Islam. Last I checked, some branches of Islam were pretty strict about theirs being the only "correct" religion. Doesn't that put it in the same boat as "Christianity"?
And, in a number of those religions you mentioned, I'm not sure that a concept of "heaven" (in the Christian sense) exists.

Also, I think there's probably a note-worthy distinction between someone believing that "they have the only answer" and someone just thinking that the answer they have is right. If you think you have the only answer, then everyone has to listen to you and anyone who doesn't is "wrong". If you just think you have a right answer then anyone else who's answer works out to be the same as yours is right too and the only people who you think are "wrong" are the one's who's answers are mutually exclusive with yours.
But the fact is that some claims of different religions are mutually exclusive. That means that someone (or possibly everyone) is wrong. I have trouble taking seriously the viewpoint that every religious answer is just as good and true as any other; two mutually exclusive statements can't both be true.

But, that said, some sects DO seem pointlessly and aggressively strict in their condemnation of other people's beliefs.

Last edited by Dilettante; 07-15-2007 at 07:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 21,731

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilettante View Post
I'm quite sure how you've "eliminated" Islam. Last I checked, some branches of Islam were pretty strict about theirs being the only "correct" religion. Doesn't that put it in the same boat as "Christianity"?


Also, I think there's probably a note-worthy distinction between someone believing that "they have the only answer" and someone just thinking that the answer they have is right.
Fact is, some claims of different religions are mutually exclusive. That means that someone (or possibly everyone) is wrong. I have trouble taking seriously those who say that every religious answer is just as good and true as any other.
But, that said, some sects seem pointlessly and aggressively strict in their condemnation of other beliefs.
This site, thetruereligion.org - News claims that Islam is the true religion so like you, I'm not sure how it was eliminated.
I'm also unsure how Judaism was eliminated. Here's their 13 priniciples:
Quote:
1. God exists.
2. God is one and unique.
3. God is incorporeal.
4. God is eternal.
5. Prayer is to be directed to God alone.
6. The words of the prophets are true.
7. Moses was the greatest prophet, and his prophecies are true.
8. The Torah was given to Moses.
9. There will be no other Torah.
10. God knows the thoughts and deeds of men.
11. God will reward the good and punish the wicked.
12. The Messiah will come.
13. The dead will be resurrected.
Basic Beliefs of Judaism
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Dilettante's Avatar
Dilettante Dilettante is offline
Secretary of Defense
Hoping to one day be a Secretary of Offense.

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,595

Pennsylvania     United_States

Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
This site, thetruereligion.org - News claims that Islam is the true religion so like you, I'm not sure how it was eliminated.
I'm also unsure how Judaism was eliminated. Here's their 13 priniciples:
I'm sure it depends on the sect in question just as it does with Christianity.
All those labels ("Christian", "Jewish" and "Muslim") seem to have become too wide-spread and unwieldy to be terribly useful these days.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Fennica's Avatar
Fennica Fennica is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 3,125

Finland    
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strider View Post
Many of the religions you mentioned don't have a hell to begin with.
Christianity also lacks hell. Or should I say `it lacked.´ In the bible there are clear refrences towards sould being lost into nothingness, but hell..no. There is no fiery pits of untold sorrow and pain which consumes the sinful and devoures the lost ones.
These ideas were incorporated into christianity in a time when church needed to compleatly subdue all manner of independent thought and innovational aspects of human mind.

Quote:
Some (Buddhism) have many adherents who don't consider their faith to be religions at all, but rather practices, or simply philosophies for living a decent life.
As most religions do.

Quote:
You're also not making the distinction between traditional and world religions. Then there's the fact that not all Christians believe this.

It's really somewhat intellectually lazy to take such a simplistic approach to such a complex set of ideas.
Ideas are simple, principles are simple, but how they work in everyday life of `people of the cross´ is a compleatly different thing.
__________________
En uneksi. I do not dream.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 21,731

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fennica View Post
Christianity also lacks hell. Or should I say `it lacked.´ In the bible there are clear refrences towards sould being lost into nothingness, but hell..no. There is no fiery pits of untold sorrow and pain which consumes the sinful and devoures the lost ones.
I don't have much time but here's one reference to hell that comes to mind:

Luke 16:22-28 (King James Version)


22And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;

23And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.

24And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

25But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.

26And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.

27Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:

28For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by liberty1776 View Post
As a Christian, I try not to make judgements with respect to what other people must do to gain Salvation. There are various scriptures that say not to judge others. So, all I can do is read the Bible, figure out what it is telling me, and do whatever that is. I can try to convince others of my views, but I cannot say that a person is going to hell if I cannot convince him.

For example, I believe that it is sinful for me to be a homosexual. However, this is my interpretation of the Bible, and because I am but a mere human, I might be way off. So, I will not be gay, but I will not condemn those who are.
I like your attitude here, it shows a humbleness not often found. I am curious if you would vote for laws to restrict the rights of homosexual people--denying them the right to jobs, housing, marriage rights (the legal rights of marriage in US law).
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,930

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Maybe he meant no disrespect and I'm willing to give the benefit of doubt, but I've had run-ins with atheists over the use of "X" and they admitted they used it disrespectfully.
Could it be that it was done to mirror the respect shown to them?
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":


Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus View Post
Some people have a persecution complex.
Mayhap - perchance.
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Wow - fascinating info! Which rather makes me wonder if Naraka is a mindset rather than a place. Perhaps more and moe of our population are needful of Naraka - and that is what the hell is going on out there!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eglaelin View Post
Greetings and Felicitations,

I would just like to point out that many versions of Buddhism have hell. In fact, they have a lot of them. Hells for this and hells for that. But. You don't get sentenced to hell for eternity. How long you get put there depends on what level of violation you have commmited. The Buddhist understand that commiting sins is based on unenlightened behavior and that you can overcome that behavior with development. Once you have suffered enough to point out the danger in your actions then you get out of hell and get the chance to further your enlightenment.


Naraka (Buddhism)

Just as a side note. The Buddhist do believe in gods. They just don't believe in a main figure that most Christians believe in. The gods are stuck in the veil of illusion (maya) just like we are. However, we have a better chance to escape from our illusions than the gods do. Why? Because they are stuck more deeply in their illusions because they are always being told they are great and ascended beings. What motivation do they have for change.

In Peace,
Eglaelin
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

I believe Islam allows salvation to any monotheist - though I assume that Muslims get a higher level. Just like the Mormon church allows heaven to any Xtian, but mormons get a better level of heaven - and, of course, those they convert to Mormonism after death. (Must be one helluva shock!)

While I can see a philosophical difference between the belief that you have the only answer - and you havethe right answer - in effect it seems frequently the person arguing would say there answer is both only and right.

I actually have no problem with the idea that all of the answers are equally right and equally wrong - but I tend to see them as something closer to tribal rite. So what is correct for the Hopitah will not be correct for the Dineh. There are many different types of people with many different lessons to learn - hence the need for many paths to the light. I believe there is one light - and virtually all religions contain certain teachings in common. For example - every religion has at least one version of the Golden Rule. It makes sense that it would need to be worded diffrently for different groups.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilettante View Post
I'm quite sure how you've "eliminated" Islam. Last I checked, some branches of Islam were pretty strict about theirs being the only "correct" religion. Doesn't that put it in the same boat as "Christianity"?
And, in a number of those religions you mentioned, I'm not sure that a concept of "heaven" (in the Christian sense) exists.

Also, I think there's probably a note-worthy distinction between someone believing that "they have the only answer" and someone just thinking that the answer they have is right. If you think you have the only answer, then everyone has to listen to you and anyone who doesn't is "wrong". If you just think you have a right answer then anyone else who's answer works out to be the same as yours is right too and the only people who you think are "wrong" are the one's who's answers are mutually exclusive with yours.
But the fact is that some claims of different religions are mutually exclusive. That means that someone (or possibly everyone) is wrong. I have trouble taking seriously the viewpoint that every religious answer is just as good and true as any other; two mutually exclusive statements can't both be true.

But, that said, some sects DO seem pointlessly and aggressively strict in their condemnation of other people's beliefs.
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
This site, thetruereligion.org - News claims that Islam is the true religion so like you, I'm not sure how it was eliminated.
I'm also unsure how Judaism was eliminated. Here's their 13 priniciples:

Basic Beliefs of Judaism

Where does it say you have to be Jewish to get to heaven - or even that being Jewish is better than any other religion? That's a statement of tribal beliefs - you can join the tribe, but it won't get you anything special.

I dealt with Islam in the last posting. While they do seem to believe that theirs is the highest monotheistic religion - they allow for salvation for Xtians and Jews - other followers of the book.
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
Josepha's Avatar
Josepha Josepha is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 1,157

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by liberty1776 View Post
As a Christian, I try not to make judgements with respect to what other people must do to gain Salvation. There are various scriptures that say not to judge others. So, all I can do is read the Bible, figure out what it is telling me, and do whatever that is. I can try to convince others of my views, but I cannot say that a person is going to hell if I cannot convince him.

For example, I believe that it is sinful for me to be a homosexual. However, this is my interpretation of the Bible, and because I am but a mere human, I might be way off. So, I will not be gay, but I will not condemn those who are.

It sounds to me like you have internalized the wisdom that Christ brought to the world!
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,424

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Do you have an aversion to typing the word "Christ" or do you just type X to show Christians that you have no respect for them?
If you want to get technical, nobody was ever named "Christ", that's Greek for "anointed", and has anyone ever met a Jew named Jesus? Thats Greek for Joshua.

Yasouah ben Miriam, became Joshua the Anointed, or Jesus Christ.
If he were here right now, he would have no idea what "jesus christ" meant.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2007
liberty1776 liberty1776 is offline
Secretary of Defense
A libertarian first, a Libertarian second

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Liberty
Posts: 2,518

   
Re: Go to hell - or not

First, I object the the "gay rights" phrase (not that you used it here, but in general). Gay people (or black people, or retarded people) have the exact same rights as everyone else. We are all entitled to own ourselves, and we can all enter into any contract which we please. It does not matter what others say. Marriage is nothing other than a contract.

I don't believe that the government should involve itself in ANY way in marriage. Gays should be able to marry, three people should be able to marry, etc. In fact, if you ask people who are against gay marriage why the government should be allowed to regulate marriage, a common response is, "Well, if we don't limit marraige somewhere, then three people can all marry eachother. Then insurance will cost more." Now, to me, this is a rather shallow reason to be against something, but let's look at it. The purported problems that this brings are not problems at all, but can be solved by the private sector. If a company has an employee that has two wives, the company can say, "Ok, I will insure you and ONE of your wives. That's it."

However, I should point out as a note, that gay people (as with straight people) do not have the right to force someone to preform a wedding ceremony. If I was a minister, I would probably refues to preform a gay wedding (or a three person wedding) because I believe that it would be immoral for me to do that. Forcing me (or anyone else) to do perform the ceremony would be slavery.

As for the other rights you mention- housing and jobs, I have two oppinions depending on what you mean by rights. If you are talking of a positive right to a job or housing, I would favor laws that do abridge this "right." This is because no one has a positive right to a job or house. If I own a business and I do not want to hire a gay person, I have a right to do that. Same with housing.

I do not favor any laws that would make it illegal for a gay couple to buy a house or for a gay guy to get a job. Just as it is perfectly legitimate for a person to refuse to sell a house to a gay person, it is equally legitimate for a person to sell a house to a gay person. Any laws abrdidging this are immoral.
__________________
"Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question."
-Thomas Jefferson in his first inauguration address
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes