Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Humanities Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Humanities Issues Religion, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 21,728

United_States     Louisiana

Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_inKarlate View Post
Not with an 8 yr old, but what of a 17-yr old who's been around the block and gets into a bar with a fake ID? Or a comparable 16-yr old? I agree that the current laws are better than no laws, but that doesn't mean the current laws are perfect. And as for the kiddie porn, if it suffices to sate some perv who would otherwise act out on his (or her) urges, then in the grand scheme it can actually be a good thing. The point of contention is that the law makes no considerations for possible benefits or non-detriments among what is admittedly a usually bad thing. (Or at least I admit it, since I don't want to speak out of turn for any others here...)
I'll agree that 25 years is a mite long for having consensual sex with a 17 year old that's sneaking into bars and passing herself off as an adult. However, I don't think you thought your statement about kiddie porn sating some perv over thoroughly. In order to obtain that porn, some poor child has been injured which means nothing good can come out of it.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 21,728

United_States     Louisiana

Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I am not saying you can't be emotional but I think we have to at least use rationality so we at least make good decisions. Emotional outbursts almost always cause more harm than a logical approach would have.
I understand but when a poster says children, (not teens), should be able to decide if they want to have sex with an adult or not, I can't help but act emotionally. How can a child of 2, 5, or even 10 years old make that kind of decision????
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2007
partofme's Avatar
partofme partofme is offline
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Murray Kentucky
Posts: 15,475

Earth     United_States

Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
I understand but when a poster says children, (not teens), should be able to decide if they want to have sex with an adult or not, I can't help but act emotionally. How can a child of 2, 5, or even 10 years old make that kind of decision????
I agree. I'm not talking about your reaction so much as the idea of reporting people based on opinions even when very unpopular.
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 21,728

United_States     Louisiana

Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I agree. I'm not talking about your reaction so much as the idea of reporting people based on opinions even when very unpopular.
Please understand that I wouldn't report anyone for their opinion if the subject was something other than child sex and child porn. We once had a poster that advocated these things, was investigated, and is, for the moment anyway, in jail for past child sex crimes. I refuse to take the chance that the current poster isn't an innocent as he claims to be (our other poster also claimed innocence). If the investigation finds him innocent, great, but we won't know that without the investigation.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2007
Porras's Avatar
Porras Porras is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
I'm your god now.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,224

United_States     Wyoming

Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

I typically agree that what a person says(aside from confession to a crime) shouldn't get them legal flack, but when you consider the nature of this issue(the psychosis of pedophiles that causes child molesters apparent incapability to control their urges for long periods of time) someone who voices their opposition to child sexual laws has earned themselves a look from the appropriate law enforcement agencies. I see this no differently than if I were to lead people to believe I might kill myself and a poster contacted my local government in an attempt to get me counseling.
__________________
During the journey we commonly forget its goal. Almost every profession is chosen as a means to an end but continued as an end in itself. Forgetting our objectives is the most frequent act of stupidity.
-Friedrich Nietzsche, The Wanderer and his Shadow

All good socialists have villas in Southern France. That's not the point.
-Eurosocialist
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2007
Beer's Avatar
Beer Beer is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,262

   
Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

Not surprising. Now, can we setup more sting ops to nab these low lives?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2007
Evil_inKarlate's Avatar
Evil_inKarlate Evil_inKarlate is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
True Non-conformist

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,740

United_States    
Re: 85% of child-porn viewers caught, have molested children themselves

Quote:
I'll agree that 25 years is a mite long for having consensual sex with a 17 year old that's sneaking into bars and passing herself off as an adult.
So 24 yrs then?

Quote:
However, I don't think you thought your statement about kiddie porn sating some perv over thoroughly. In order to obtain that porn, some poor child has been injured which means nothing good can come out of it.
Actually I did think it through - The first wording made it sound even more positive, so I toned it down. Given a hypothetical choice between one child being exploited (not necessarily even abused) for a camera vs multiple children being abused, the former is the obvious choice, and thus at least relatively good. Or more realistically, substitute 'several' and 'many more' for 'one' and 'multiple', but the reasoning still holds.

But back to the OP topic. The thought occurred to me last nite (IIRC ironically enough while I was bathing with my infant son) that the reasoning behind child porn bans is to protect children from pervs. But if only 85% of such viewers have actually done anything to children, that means we have a law with a whopping 15% improper conviction rate! That to me cries out for some sort of reform.
__________________
Today's forecast: Government corruption.
Tomorrow's forecast: 100% chance of more 'politics as usual'

Maybe it's finally time to vote Libertarian
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online