Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Humanities Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Humanities Issues Religion, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 9,784

United_States     Virginia

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
No, hillbilly chose one fact and then, in typical hillbilly fashion, made a non sequitir.
Nobel offers many prizes, not just Peace a,d they are in arts and sciences.



[quote]I think that the average Jacque and Helmut are more wrapped up in science than the average Bubba, yes. I also think that the average American man who wins the Nobel Prize in one of the sciences does not go to church, go to music concerts on a regular basis, modify his automobile with various non-standard hubcaps, lights, and speakers, and wear a baseball cap in his daily life. I also think that the average American woman who wins the Nobel Prize in one of the sciences does not go to church, or obsess over celebrity gossip.[/quoet]

is there a point in that apart from your false sense of elitism ?


Quote:
Explain why the US has the highest rate of rejection, among adults, of Evolution in the West.
because we demand proof before we just say 'ok'

Quote:
Explain why the US is bottom of the barrel in stem cell research in the West.
link ?

Quote:
Explain why US school children are close to testing near the bottom of the barrel in math and science in the West.
NEA

Quote:
Explain why the US steadfastly refuses to adopt a system of weights and measures that was developed precisely to facilitate science.
science here does use those measurements and both are taught in school
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
I'll try and answer these, but understand that I am in no way an expert and I don't think my answers will work for everybody. These answers are not based in any study or scientific observation, just my own experience.
Fair enough.

Quote:
Hard to point to a precise reason. Part of it may be the System of US education which prefers to let the individual states control education. Various states have various cultures that place priorities in different places. Also, many people in America feel that there are more important priorities than science.
Indeed, and the culture of some these states is shit, and the people to whom you refer, who place other things over science, are generally ignorant and backwards.

Quote:
This, in my opinion, has to do with the various moral ethical problems people have with the idea. Actually, though, these people are in the minority if you look at the polls that are out there. It just happens that we previously had a president who did not like the idea.
Bush II was wildy populaur in this country, at the beginning, up to a bit past the midpoint of his eight years.

Quote:
The ever present flaws in the educational system including tying school funding to property values.
This, combined with a cultural loathing of science, may explain why.

Quote:
People are stubborn and really don't want to deal with a new system when the present when works just fine.
Here is an example. To calculate kinetic energy, you use the equation KE =0.5 * mass * velocity^2

So, using metric, you take 0.5, multiply it by the mass of the object, in kilograms, and then multiply it by the square of the object's velocity, wherein said velocity is in meters per second. and voila, you have your answer in Joules.

In the imperial system, energy is measured in foot-pounds. First, you take 0.5 and multiply it by the mass of the object, which, contrary to what a lot of dumbasses in this country think, is not measured in pounds (pounds being a measure of a FORCE), but rather, in grains or stones. Let's say you choose the former, grains. Next, you take the velocity of the object, in feet per second, and square it. Then you multiply that result by 0.5 times the mass, calculated previously. THEN you take another number that is necessary because you're being a dumbass and using imperial units, and multiply it by the previous result, whereby said number is 0.000004442.

So, does anyone think that the imperial system should be used for science and engineering?
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 1,175

United_States     Netherlands

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
Indeed, and the culture of some these states is shit, and the people to whom you refer, who place other things over science, are generally ignorant and backwards.
Well I never said that. There are many honorable and respectable parts of those states. They just have a different outlook

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
Bush II was wildy populaur in this country, at the beginning, up to a bit past the midpoint of his eight years.
That was more due to the "rally around the flag" feelings after a serious terrorist attacks. Polls show that 60% of Americans favor stem cell research

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
This, combined with a cultural loathing of science, may explain why.
loathing may be the wrong word. Suspicion is a better way to put it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
Here is an example. To calculate kinetic energy, you use the equation KE =0.5 * mass * velocity^2

So, using metric, you take 0.5, multiply it by the mass of the object, in kilograms, and then multiply it by the square of the object's velocity, wherein said velocity is in meters per second. and voila, you have your answer in Joules.

In the imperial system, energy is measured in foot-pounds. First, you take 0.5 and multiply it by the mass of the object, which, contrary to what a lot of dumbasses in this country think, is not measured in pounds (pounds being a measure of a FORCE), but rather, in grains or stones. Let's say you choose the former, grains. Next, you take the velocity of the object, in feet per second, and square it. Then you multiply that result by 0.5 times the mass, calculated previously. THEN you take another number that is necessary because you're being a dumbass and using imperial units, and multiply it by the previous result, whereby said number is 0.000004442.

So, does anyone think that the imperial system should be used for science and engineering?
I'm not denying it's more efficient, just people don't think our measurement system is broken, so why fix it.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
Nobel offers many prizes, not just Peace a,d they are in arts and sciences.
I know that. So what?
Quote:
Quote:
I think that the average Jacque and Helmut are more wrapped up in science than the average Bubba, yes. I also think that the average American man who wins the Nobel Prize in one of the sciences does not go to church, go to music concerts on a regular basis, modify his automobile with various non-standard hubcaps, lights, and speakers, and wear a baseball cap in his daily life. I also think that the average American woman who wins the Nobel Prize in one of the sciences does not go to church, or obsess over celebrity gossip.
is there a point in that apart from your false sense of elitism ?
Um, to show that your average American Nobel Prize winner in Physics or Chemistry is not from the American cultural mainstream.

Quote:
because we demand proof before we just say 'ok'
You have a century and a half worth of proof. The proof is piled so high that you could drown in it. The proof permeates every nook and cranny of the rational posts of this thread.

Once again, go here: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: the Scientific Case for Common Descent

Quote:
link ?
US 'falling behind' in stem cell research | Science | guardian.co.uk

Quote:
NEA
It's a combinaton of dumbassery on both the left and the right.

Quote:
science here does use those measurements and both are taught in school
Yes, it does. So that begs the question, if they use the metric system in science classes in the US, why doesn't the larger US culture accept the metric system, if it really is not the case that the US is anti-science, as you maintain?
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
stillalive's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
birdwatcher

 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,575

European_Union     India

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
I'll try and answer these, but understand that I am in no way an expert and I don't think my answers will work for everybody. These answers are not based in any study or scientific observation, just my own experience.


Hard to point to a precise reason. Part of it may be the System of US education which prefers to let the individual states control education. Various states have various cultures that place priorities in different places. Also, many people in America feel that there are more important priorities than science.



This, in my opinion, has to do with the various moral ethical problems people have with the idea. Actually, though, these people are in the minority if you look at the polls that are out there. It just happens that we previously had a president who did not like the idea.



The ever present flaws in the educational system including tying school funding to property values.



People are stubborn and really don't want to deal with a new system when the present when works just fine.

Again, I in no way speak for everybody.
The US are not the only country with these problems.
Nearly all countries in the ME and some in northern Africa have similar problems.

Reason is, I believe, that politicians need cattle to vote for them.
Educating children or grown ups costs a lot of money.
Besides, educated folks tend to think, especially in times of elections and might thus create unwanted results.

Then again, it is a lot cheaper to neglect education and import intelligence where needed.
When other countries provide the education of the imported it´s no burden on the own economy.

I´ve met a lot of highly intelligent people in the USA. But I´ve also met quite a few with an intelligence level as present in rural parts of Mauretania.
Though sadly, the latter were nearly all homegrown.
__________________
"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse
of a boom brought about by credit (debt) expansion.
The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner
as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit (debt) expansion,
or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved." - Ludwig von Mises
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
I'm not denying it's more efficient, just people don't think our measurement system is broken, so why fix it.
You don't think that the example that I provided, wherein I demonstrated that the metric units are desinged to align with Physics equations, and that the imperial units are anything but aligned with Physics equations, shows that the imperial system is broken and wholly inappropriate for modern times?
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stillalive View Post
The US are not the only country with these problems.
Nearly all countries in the ME and some in northern Africa have similar problems.

Reason is, I believe, that politicians need cattle to vote for them.
Educating children or grown ups costs a lot of money.
Besides, educated folks tend to think, especially in times of elections and might thus create unwanted results.

Then again, it is a lot cheaper to neglect education and import intelligence where needed.
When other countries provide the education of the imported it´s no burden on the own economy.

I´ve met a lot of highly intelligent people in the USA. But I´ve also met quite a few with an intelligence level as present in rural parts of Mauretania.
Though sadly, the latter were nearly all homegrown.
Yes, it is ironic that those in this country who bitch the most loudly about fundamentalist Islam are themselves fundamentalist Christians with many of the same backwards attributes. What hypocritical scum.
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 3,490

New_York     Earth

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

In terms of the OP, the US is not anti-science, but I think it does have an expectation of an engineering application. Science for the sake of science is nice, but it doesn't put food on the table or a roof over the head. Our history is full of captains of industry bringing science and technology to market in order to improve the quality of life. If anything, the bar is set that much higher.

This is put on display in the specific political issues mentioned. The evolution of the human form several million years ago means very little at the rate it progresses. We are not going to sprout a third arm anytime soon. It suffices that higher order mammals are built with enough of the same pieces that experiments on them tell us something about our own bodies. And for the most part we don't even use monkeys because such studies would take decades. No one who questions evolution raids ratteries to prevent such experimentation. No one rejects natural mutations that require a new flu shot every year. What it boils down to is the egos who demand acceptance need to get over themselves and do something productive instead preaching.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 1,175

United_States     Netherlands

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
You don't think that the example that I provided, wherein I demonstrated that the metric units are desinged to align with Physics equations, and that the imperial units are anything but aligned with Physics equations, shows that the imperial system is broken and wholly inappropriate for modern times?
not particularly for a couple of reasons

1. most people aren't involved in physics or engineering calculations, but everyday things and our system works just fine.

2. I have yet to see an example of a building falling down because we used the imperial system.

and as I said earlier, i'm not denying the metric system is better I just don't think we'll every switch to it so why make a big deal out of it.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 1,175

United_States     Netherlands

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stillalive View Post
The US are not the only country with these problems.
Nearly all countries in the ME and some in northern Africa have similar problems.

Reason is, I believe, that politicians need cattle to vote for them.
Educating children or grown ups costs a lot of money.
Besides, educated folks tend to think, especially in times of elections and might thus create unwanted results.

Then again, it is a lot cheaper to neglect education and import intelligence where needed.
When other countries provide the education of the imported it´s no burden on the own economy.

I´ve met a lot of highly intelligent people in the USA. But I´ve also met quite a few with an intelligence level as present in rural parts of Mauretania.
Though sadly, the latter were nearly all homegrown.
Well, I'm not that cynical about why the system needs improvement. And, of course, while the Middle Eastern countries may have similar problems, they have not achieved the role of economic and military super power.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore View Post
In terms of the OP, the US is not anti-science, but I think it does have an expectation of an engineering application. Science for the sake of science is nice, but it doesn't put food on the table or a roof over the head. Our history is full of captains of industry bringing science and technology to market in order to improve the quality of life. If anything, the bar is set that much higher.
Okay. Do you think that stem cell research has the potential to improve quality of life?

Quote:
This is put on display in the specific political issues mentioned. The evolution of the human form several million years ago means very little at the rate it progresses. We are not going to sprout a third arm anytime soon. It suffices that higher order mammals are built with enough of the same pieces that experiments on them tell us something about our own bodies. And for the most part we don't even use monkeys because such studies would take decades. No one who questions evolution raids ratteries to prevent such experimentation. No one rejects natural mutations that require a new flu shot every year. What it boils down to is the egos who demand acceptance need to get over themselves and do something productive instead preaching.
To whom are you referring in the last sentence?
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Non Sequitur View Post
not particularly for a couple of reasons

1. most people aren't involved in physics or engineering calculations, but everyday things and our system works just fine.

2. I have yet to see an example of a building falling down because we used the imperial system.

and as I said earlier, i'm not denying the metric system is better I just don't think we'll every switch to it so why make a big deal out of it.
Several hundred million dollars were wasted when a Mars lander crashed due to the appalling mixture of imperial and metric units during the design phase of the spacecraft.
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
Tanngrisnir3's Avatar
Vice President
Biscuits. Like bread with training wheels. For retards.

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,168

California     United_States

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
Several hundred million dollars were wasted when a Mars lander crashed due to the appalling mixture of imperial and metric units during the design phase of the spacecraft.
Which, by itself, is no reason at all to change.
__________________
All things serve The Beam
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
County Executive

 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: north america
Posts: 358

   
Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

The crash would not have happened if the engineers exclusively used metric units.
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2009
Non Sequitur's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 1,175

United_States     Netherlands

Re: Relative to the rest of the West, why is the US so anti-science?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
Several hundred million dollars were wasted when a Mars lander crashed due to the appalling mixture of imperial and metric units during the design phase of the spacecraft.
I agree with Tanngrisnir. Our system works just fine for me.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent."
-John Calvin
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online