Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net


Page 15 of 26 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526 LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 376

Thread: border securty, aye

  1. #211
    soot's Avatar
    soot is offline Secretary of Defense
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,399
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Martin View Post
    We don't have enough soldiers in uniform to patrol the entire border effectively 24/7/365. Not even if we pull in every overseas soldier there is.

    Lets not conflate military training with police training. They are quite different. On the border, against individuals, we want police action, not military action. Bill Clinton tried that, and the only result was that 4 US Marines in Ghillie suits were able to sneak up on an 18 year old goat herder and shoot him dead.
    Finally, finally, finally I agree with you Dick.

    And not just a little bit but a lot.

    Any military forces patroling the border, assuming there were such, would need to be throughly trained for the new assignment and would need to be kept under very strict ROE.

    In fact, I wouldn't have a huge problem with military forces acting as spotters and requiring them to contact and call up more throughly trained and experienced BP agents in order to make the arrest.

    I think it's totally possible.

    I pulled guard duty in civilian population centers while carrying live ammunition and never shot anyone (I was trained as an Infantryman) and I also know of many instances in both Iraq and Afghanistan where support troops (who were not trained in combat tactics) acquitted themselves admirably in armed engagements.

    One example of snipers killing some kid is in no way exemplary of an overall inability of military forces to accomplish whatever mission is laid before them.

    By your logic Muslims can't be trusted within the Continental United States because one time a few of them killed some people.

    Utterly ridiculous.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Martin View Post
    These guys are soldiers, They work as units and attack other units. They are not trained to work a beat nor are they trained to do interrogations, use undercover techniques, analyze patterns, or any of the other regular features of police work. Their goal is to remove the enemies ability to wage war and his willingness to wage war. That is not a goal of border work.
    Nobody is suggesting that these forces would do interrogations, use undercover techniques, analyze patterns, etc...

    We're suggesting that they stand guard posts.

    I guarantee you that that's something the military is plenty familiar with, based on my personal experience, and can execute faithfully.

    "Stand here, look through these binos, if you see Mexicans get on the radio and call this guy."

    A caveman could do it.

    Any examples of what's happening in the WARZONES of Iraq and Astan are silly. Unless the Mexicans start shooting and driving VBIEDs into guardposts. If thhey do that then thhey deserve to get lit up.

  2. #212
    Dick Martin's Avatar
    Dick Martin is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    6,732
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Darn, I almost made my point, but not quite.

    I am not running down anyone when I say the military isn't trained for the job. I want my military sneaking up on targets and killing them! Thats their job, I have no desire to try to equip them with a flip-switch and each morning we flip the switch to soldier or cop, depending on the order of the day. These guys are soldiers. I want them to be soldiers.

    We already have Border Patrol agents. These guys are good, highly trained, and with a long back ground of success. Why not give them some money so they can hire some more guards, instead of cutting their budget?

    This idea that we have to "cut spending" is giving us stupid consequences. "Despite long hours, harsh weather conditions and budget cuts that make their jobs more difficult, members of the U.S. Border Patrol are happy to protect the border. "
    JMS Reports - Border Patrol overcomes budget obstacles

    If you really want to do something to help, call your Congress critter and tell them to get off this budget cutting nonsense and give the US Border Patrol the money they need.
    "There is no gain in arguing with a poo flinging monkey. While his
    gibbering and raucous cries of victory may seem obnoxious in your ears
    as you walk away, he will soon be quietly sitting behind his bars again
    and licking his own feces off his fingers as you carry on with your day."

  3. #213
    buck84's Avatar
    buck84 is offline U.S. Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    762
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by michael h View Post
    A wall still requires troops.
    Yeah but a 2.5 million volt electric fence doesn't it.

  4. #214
    Dick Martin's Avatar
    Dick Martin is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    6,732
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by buck84 View Post
    Yeah but a 2.5 million volt electric fence doesn't it.
    How about serious solutions instead of derailing discussions with solutions that are ridiculous. This is America. This is not the USSR.

    btw, short circuiting a 2.5 million volt electric fence is not all that big a deal. Spectacular, yes, but not something requiring technical expertise.
    "There is no gain in arguing with a poo flinging monkey. While his
    gibbering and raucous cries of victory may seem obnoxious in your ears
    as you walk away, he will soon be quietly sitting behind his bars again
    and licking his own feces off his fingers as you carry on with your day."

  5. #215
    michael h is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    maine
    Posts
    7,841
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by buck84 View Post
    Yeah but a 2.5 million volt electric fence doesn't it.
    lmao, Buck that's mad harsh.
    “If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan Greenspan
    We need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan

  6. #216
    soot's Avatar
    soot is offline Secretary of Defense
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,399
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Martin View Post
    I am not running down anyone when I say the military isn't trained for the job.
    I did think you were running them down. Nothing you said gave that impression.

    I do agree that they're not trained for the job and I think that they'd have to be.

    Even if the training were minimal, in order to prepare them for a minimal role in border security, it would have to be made crystal clear that they're on that border in a particular capacity and that isn't to fight a war on Mexicans.

    Honestly, I don't even think that Mexicans would try running the border in the numbers they currently do if it were clear to them that it was no longer a block of Swiss cheese with holes, literally, miles wide.

    Regardless, this whole line of discussion is mental masturbation because we both know that the Posse Comitatus Act isn't going to be amended, nor is our government going to take the actions necessary to allow an end-run around it.

    If you really want to do something to help, call your Congress critter and tell them to get off this budget cutting nonsense and give the US Border Patrol the money they need.
    Only if they take that money from the Welfare budget and don't fuck with the economy by punishing our corporate job providers.


































    (I kid.)

  7. #217
    buck84's Avatar
    buck84 is offline U.S. Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    762
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Martin View Post
    How about serious solutions instead of derailing discussions with solutions that are ridiculous. This is America. This is not the USSR.

    btw, short circuiting a 2.5 million volt electric fence is not all that big a deal. Spectacular, yes, but not something requiring technical expertise.
    Well derailing the conversation is not my intention. A little comic relief yes probably guilty of that. However, the whole thing is not rocket science. People make the argument all day long about how we are all immigrants and yes that is true, but since the good old days when hundreds of thousands set sail on the ocean blue, we have developed into a country of laws since then. Immigration has associated laws now. So either we enforce them or repeal them. What good are having laws if you do not intend to enforce them. The migrants coming across the border are only seen as new voters and thats the only reason that are politicians don't want to shut if off. It is not being stopped because our "leaders" do not want it to stop. It really is that simple. Don't believe me? Go hop across the fence and see how long it takes before your eye to eye with federalis. If they can do it so can we.

  8. #218
    michael h is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    maine
    Posts
    7,841
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by buck84 View Post
    Well derailing the conversation is not my intention. A little comic relief yes probably guilty of that. However, the whole thing is not rocket science. People make the argument all day long about how we are all immigrants and yes that is true, but since the good old days when hundreds of thousands set sail on the ocean blue, we have developed into a country of laws since then. Immigration has associated laws now. So either we enforce them or repeal them. What good are having laws if you do not intend to enforce them. The migrants coming across the border are only seen as new voters and thats the only reason that are politicians don't want to shut if off. It is not being stopped because our "leaders" do not want it to stop. It really is that simple. Don't believe me? Go hop across the fence and see how long it takes before your eye to eye with federalis. If they can do it so can we.
    Agreed, they have no desire, both parties have interests in keeping the door open.
    “If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan Greenspan
    We need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan

  9. #219
    buck84's Avatar
    buck84 is offline U.S. Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    762
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by michael h View Post
    Agreed, they have no desire, both parties have interests in keeping the door open.
    Exactly, I just get tired of individuals saying "well you're a rightist" or "you're a right winger" or what ever for saying enforce the damn law thats currently in place. Thats it. That simple. What really pisses me off is the arrogance of people that have broken the immigration laws, lined up in the streets protesting! What the hell is that about? If anyone was once an immigrant and are now a legalized citizen, and they want to protest, I'm fine with that. Go ahead, you, in my mind, have earned your right to protest. When you are a U.S. citizen, within the borders of the U.S., you're speech is protected and you are allowed to protest all you want. You don't get U.S. citizen rights just because you crossed a river, that makes you a trespasser.

  10. #220
    Dick Martin's Avatar
    Dick Martin is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    6,732
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by buck84 View Post
    Exactly, I just get tired of individuals saying "well you're a rightist" or "you're a right winger" or what ever for saying enforce the damn law thats currently in place. Thats it. That simple. What really pisses me off is the arrogance of people that have broken the immigration laws, lined up in the streets protesting! What the hell is that about? If anyone was once an immigrant and are now a legalized citizen, and they want to protest, I'm fine with that. Go ahead, you, in my mind, have earned your right to protest. When you are a U.S. citizen, within the borders of the U.S., you're speech is protected and you are allowed to protest all you want. You don't get U.S. citizen rights just because you crossed a river, that makes you a trespasser.
    Actually, the US Constitution is pretty specific on that. The word citizen is not used. Its about the rights of people, not the rights of citizens,

    I understand your sentiment, but the Constitution is the law of the land; we abide by it.
    "There is no gain in arguing with a poo flinging monkey. While his
    gibbering and raucous cries of victory may seem obnoxious in your ears
    as you walk away, he will soon be quietly sitting behind his bars again
    and licking his own feces off his fingers as you carry on with your day."

  11. #221
    Donahue Guest

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by soot View Post
    In my opinion?

    Absolutely.

    Please contact Senator Reid and Representative Pelosi for me and tell them I'm gonna need to get the Democratic Party on board with our amendment process.

    Be sure to tell them that we'd like to amend the PCA in order to allow federal military troops to conduct law enforcement activities on U.S. territory.

    Wait, wait. Did you say "simply" amend?

    Obviously I meant simply in regard to being a far more direct way to address PCA than your roundabout decommissioning, recommissioning, etc. way to legalize troops patrolling the border and not that the process would be any more likely. Unfortunately our politicians are far more worried about keeping their job than doing it and protecting our borders. I doubt we'll ever seriously address our illegal immigration problem as federal politicians are unwilling to be seen as disenfranchising the Hispanic vote.

  12. #222
    buck84's Avatar
    buck84 is offline U.S. Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    762
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Martin View Post
    Actually, the US Constitution is pretty specific on that. The word citizen is not used. Its about the rights of people, not the rights of citizens,

    I understand your sentiment, but the Constitution is the law of the land; we abide by it.
    I'll go along with that. With that being said all immigration laws and anything else associated with immigration to the U.S. needs to be repealed. Let's not stop there though lets see what other laws can be tossed out. My point is laws are only good if they are enforced other than that they are just words on a piece of paper and mean nothing and if they mean nothing no point in having them.

  13. #223
    Dick Martin's Avatar
    Dick Martin is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    6,732
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by buck84 View Post
    I'll go along with that. With that being said all immigration laws and anything else associated with immigration to the U.S. needs to be repealed. Let's not stop there though lets see what other laws can be tossed out. My point is laws are only good if they are enforced other than that they are just words on a piece of paper and mean nothing and if they mean nothing no point in having them.
    There are many ways to enforce laws. Standing there with a stick is probably the worst way.
    "There is no gain in arguing with a poo flinging monkey. While his
    gibbering and raucous cries of victory may seem obnoxious in your ears
    as you walk away, he will soon be quietly sitting behind his bars again
    and licking his own feces off his fingers as you carry on with your day."

  14. #224
    MeadHallPirate's Avatar
    MeadHallPirate is offline 2011 USPOL Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    sailin' the seven seas
    Posts
    11,926
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Martin View Post
    There are many ways to enforce laws. Standing there with a stick is probably the worst way.
    ahoy Dick Martin,

    i have to be honest, and i hate to disagree matey, but i think it be reasonable to say that a 2000 mile state 'o the art fence that is additionally guarded by our mateys in green....armed with thar fearsome weaponry, is gonna really stem the tide 'o immigrants crossin' into our land illegally.

    i just be very concerned 'bout the cost, fer as many, many on our forums are constantly remindin' me, we're broke, bankrupt as a nation.

    - MeadHallPirate

  15. #225
    hairballxavier is offline President
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    The Crossroads ...
    Posts
    14,244
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: border securty, aye

    Quote Originally Posted by soot View Post
    But you're still not addressing the issue of the Posse Comitatus Act which prohibits the use of the active duty military (except for the Coast Guard) for law enforcement purposes.

    As you say above, illegal immigrants aren't enemy combatants, they're criminals who have violated or are violating a federal law (the McCarran–Walter Act).

    Therefore, it is illegal to station active duty military forces along the border and expect them to prevent violation of the McCarran–Walter Act.

    In short, no matter where the military forces come from, be it Iraq or Afghanistan, Germany or Korea, Ft. Drum or Ft. Benning, they cannot legally be used to secure the border.

    National Guard units are not federal troops so they could, in theory, be used to secure the border but then they'd have to be paid by the states, not the federal government. Since I can't think of a single state that would be able to absorb the expense of a permentant activation of the National Guard the states would have to ask the federal government to pick up the tab.

    Here's the Catch-22 though - in order to be paid by the federal government they'd have to be activated by the federal government and then they become federal troops and are subject to the prohibitions of the Posse Comitatus Act.

    So again, in order to even have a chance of pulling off the plan you're suggesting you have to classify illegal immigrants as enemy combatants, or declare martial law, or secure Congressional approval overriding the Posse Comitatus Act, or amend the Posse Comitatus Act to allow federal troops to enforce the McCarran–Walter Act.

    You might be able to do one or all of those things if you've got a veto-proof Republican Congress and a Republican President but you'd have to expect that as soon as control of one House of Congress or the presidency reverted to Decocratic control either enforcement of the newly amended Posse Comitatus Act would halt or funding for the stationing of troops on the border would get pulled or wouldn't be renewed.

    You see what I'm saying?

    It isn't that I don't like your idea - because I do.

    It's just that your idea is illegal and the hoops that you'd have to jump through to make it legal probably aren't going to happen.
    Ahoy soot,

    I spend a considerable amount of my leisure time on Lake Erie. And one of my secret fishin' spots straddles the US-Canada border where I theorize there might be an uncharted shipwreck that has developed it's own little ecosystem down thar in the depths because me anchor has got stuck on something down there more than a few times.

    I bought me first vessle in 1994. And from 1994 to 2001 me vessle was only boarded by the authorities twice. Once by the parks department and the other time it was by the US Coast Guard. However, since 9/11 me vessle has been boarded by the US Coast Guard so many times that I know some of them honorable seafarers on a first name basis.

    They are very knowlegeable about the many hazards o' Lake Erie and boating in general. I welcome them aboard with open arms because although I've been a Captain o' me own vessle fer a long time, I don't have alot of experience compared to them and they be eager to share their knowledge. Experience is counted by how many hours ye spent on the water, not how many years ye owned a vessle.

    Bottom line is that the US Coast Guard is part of the US military and they have been protecting the northern border for a long time. So if the US military can be used to protect the northern border why can't the US military be used to protect the southern border?

    -Capt'n Hairball

Similar Threads

  1. Meanwhile, down on the border....
    By MattInFla in forum Immigration
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-18-2010, 12:22 PM
  2. US-Canada border issues
    By O'Sullivan Bere in forum Immigration
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-11-2010, 09:08 AM
  3. Canadian Border Security...
    By Steve in forum Immigration
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 04-07-2010, 06:11 AM
  4. New Texas border webcams
    By Little-Acorn in forum The White House
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 09:00 PM
  5. New Texas border webcams
    By Little-Acorn in forum US Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-06-2006, 08:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •