Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > International Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2006
Dormouse Dormouse is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 11,095

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M
Does the same go for Mexico?
I don't think so. We need a better term - because "North America" normally means US and Canada - which is substantially different than Mexico. But of course, Mexico is certainly within North America geographically - just not quite culturally.

Mexico has far more in common with S.America than N.America on cultural levels.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2006
Dago's Avatar
Dago Dago is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 4,334

United_States     California

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Michael
I have previously argued that Canadians specifically, and foreigners generally do have a right to speak on US policy since we are so intimately affected by it on so many direct levels.
I agree.

Usually my posts are in response to B.C Baileys beligerence.
__________________

Jn 4:14
I have my own Kingdom. You may live in it.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2006
Gort's Avatar
Gort Gort is offline
President
Badges? We don need no stinkin badges

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: 42.88 85.52
Posts: 10,280

United_States     Germany

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedrow
Gort, I agree with pretty much everything you said, but even you have recognized that the Mexican border is so porous that you can have all the border agents at the "legal" crossings all you want, but that won't prevent someone from entering illegally if they truly want to. I think this is the point Bailey was trying to make.

In essence, what I understand from Bailey is that the extra security may complicate matters for the few who want to enter the US illegally but it also hampers the many who want to enter for legit reasons.
Zedrow it is true the issues with the Mexican border are completely different from the issues on the Canadian border. Let me ask you a question? What percentage of Canadians have passports? When you cross through one of the land checkpoints are Canadians required to be fingerprinted? I pass through the Windsor checkpoint regularly, both the Ambassador Bridge and the tunnel and I have never seen anyone being asked to exit their car while doing so. Now I am not claiming this never happens, but I do not think it is the Canadians that are being asked for fingerprints, although I will admit I may be wrong on this one. As for the passport thing, we should probably all have them anyway. It is either going to be that or some other form of national ID that will soon be required, and once it is there will be no more issue about having the proper ID for crossing the border. Perhaps I have bailey all wrong, all though I don't think so, but to me all he does is find some point, any point really, on which to complain about the US. Well frankly Zedrow while he is certainly free to provide his opinion it isn't his country, it's mine. THe longest undefended border was fine while it lasted. THat time is over now and it is time to face new a new reality.
__________________

The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2006
Dago's Avatar
Dago Dago is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 4,334

United_States     California

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Also, I would like to point out, not only are foreigners affected by this new requirment, as I'm currently living in Mexico (about 30 min south of the border in the Rosarito beach community) and commute everyday to the otherside for work.
__________________

Jn 4:14
I have my own Kingdom. You may live in it.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2006
Gort's Avatar
Gort Gort is offline
President
Badges? We don need no stinkin badges

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: 42.88 85.52
Posts: 10,280

United_States     Germany

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Michael
Come on Gort, you know bailey doesn't speak for all Canadians...

I fundamentally believe that from a political perspective, American opinion (and American Government views) on Canadian border security is a valid concern.

I have previously argued that Canadians specifically, and foreigners generally do have a right to speak on US policy since we are so intimately affected by it on so many direct levels.

For example, the glorious Common Law legal tradition that was born in England some 800 years ago and forms the basis, structure and form of the law in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia (plus a couple other outposts) is an interconnected web in theory and practice. US Court decisions can and do get cited in Canadian law courts. They are not binding any more than Canadian cites in US law courts. But they can be influential in the tradition that the law improves through 'best practice' that such competitiveness of jurisprudence can produce.

Certainly in the academic literature on 'public policy and administration' (that I actually subscribe to!) - articles routinely compare case-studies draw from US States and Canadian Provinces as the differences and similarities are no more or no less than the range of differences and similarities between Texas and Maine (for example).

And of course, in taxes, customs, corporate law, border security, coastal control and national defense, there is an obvious and strong connection between Canada and the USA - by the simple rule of the market. This is similar to the national mutual-interest that is increasingly common in Europe - for exactly the same reasons: it is as necessary as it is beneficial. However, it is rarely popular on either side of the border (NA or Europe or wherever).

All that being said, I think it is quite valid for non-Americans to have opinions on American public policy proposals. If anything, competition and open dialogue is always a benefit - and the door goes both ways, certainly.
MM I have no problem with Canadians or anyone from any other country having opinions about America and American policy. What I do have a problem with is those people expecting Americans to act on thier opinions. We do what we feel is in the best interest of our country, just as you do the same for yours, Germans do what they feel is best for Germany etc. I can tell them and you what I think, but when I expect you to act on that I have gone a little to far.

As for business we both know they will work out some kind of arrangement for goods crossing between the two nations. Neither of us wants to destroy that relationship. However I see no problem with requiring anyone who wants to enter the US from a foreign country, Americans as well as non Americans, to have to provide proof of citizenship.
__________________

The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2006
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,274

European_Union    
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbailey65
Sorry to break it to you but Canada has a different culture than the US as well, starting with politics. Almost all Canadian politicians of any stripe are further left than comparable US politicians. We believe in gun control. We're against capital punishment. We support the UN. We support the effort against terrorism in Afghanistan (we are in control of that effort at the moment) but we think Iraq was a stupid mistake that had nothing to do with terrorism and we were correct. We believe in an International Court (currently headed by Louise Arbour, a Canadian). We believe in a landmine ban. We believe in peace-keeping. We don't believe in the weaponization of space or Star Wars. We believe in the Kyoto Protocol even though we are one of the largest users and producers of fossil fuels on the planet and it will cost us billions to comply. We use British spelling. We use metric. We're humble and don't believe in aggressive patriotism. We belive in the world and what it has to offer - we don't think it's a scary place we have to impose our "superior" values upon like the US often does, intentionally or otherwise. We believe in international cooperation, not selfish and short-sighted unilateralism. We believe in multi-culturalism and are much more welcoming to immigrants, as opposed to your assimilationist melting pot. We don't believe being rich, famous and selfish is a virtue to be celebrated a la The Apprentice, entertaining as that show may be. We believe in decriminalizing pot and other drugs because the "war on drugs" is a failure. We don't believe it's wise to fill up our prisons with 1% of our population and use it as a last resort - subsequently we have a murder rate that is one-third of yours per capita (even though we have a more racially diverse population, especially in our large cities).
We believe in a critical free press. We don't fawn over our leaders - if they are full of crap they are skewered mercilessly. Your politicians wouldn't last a minute in Parliament's blisteringly critical Question Period. We don't automatically sue someone when we have a disagreement. In general we're a much more compassionate society and we belive that government should address inequities and that the marketplace doesn't offer all the solutions. We believe in universal medical insurance and strong social programs. We don't believe we are a "divine" nation and have a healthy seperation of chuch and state. We believe in gay marriage (it became legal a couple of years ago) and we couldn't care less about gays in the military. We take holidays in Cuba, smoke their cigars and can drink legally when we're 19; 18 in Quebec. We have two official languages.

Granted we have many similarities but Canadians don't want to be Americans because we know we live in the best country, with the best cities in the world according to the UN, the Economist Intelligence Unit, Mercer Consulting, et. al.
As a European I agree in all this. Good writing bailey!

Last edited by Wallaroo; 03-07-2006 at 05:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2006
bcbailey65's Avatar
bcbailey65 bcbailey65 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,791

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedrow
Gort, I agree with pretty much everything you said, but even you have recognized that the Mexican border is so porous that you can have all the border agents at the "legal" crossings all you want, but that won't prevent someone from entering illegally if they truly want to. I think this is the point Bailey was trying to make.

In essence, what I understand from Bailey is that the extra security may complicate matters for the few who want to enter the US illegally but it also hampers the many who want to enter for legit reasons.
Correct. I would also point out that a border, by its very nature of being something that divides two jurisdictions, requires each jurisdiction to have an equal say in how that border gets organized. Common sense. What Gort posted - stating that only Americans should determine border policy, completely ignoring the needs, concerns and requirements of the other countries SHARING that border, is the height of arrogance - really quite unbelievable. I would also point out to Gort as I did earlier to Dago, that Canada DID tighten its refugee and immigration policies in 2002 in response to US pressure so his comments were erroneous. Another US myth bites the dust. The purpose of this thread.

http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/media/s...004/ccat_e.htm

http://www.diycanadaimmigration.com/...ugee-laws.html

Last edited by bcbailey65; 03-09-2006 at 01:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2006
bcbailey65's Avatar
bcbailey65 bcbailey65 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,791

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dago
I agree.

Usually my posts are in response to B.C Baileys beligerence.
Likewise Dago as it takes two to tango.

Last edited by bcbailey65; 03-09-2006 at 01:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2006
bcbailey65's Avatar
bcbailey65 bcbailey65 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,791

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo
As a European I agree in all this. Good writing bailey!
Thanks Wallaroo! I LOVE EUROPE! Although I've spent years living and travelling in your part of the world, I have't been to Denmark yet. My wife says it's her favourite country.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2006
bcbailey65's Avatar
bcbailey65 bcbailey65 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,791

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dago
Also, I would like to point out, not only are foreigners affected by this new requirment, as I'm currently living in Mexico (about 30 min south of the border in the Rosarito beach community) and commute everyday to the otherside for work.
Correct. Is it a hassle for you to cross the border everyday? Is it getting worse? I'd like your perspective. Do you support these policies or do you think they are problematic?
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2006
bcbailey65's Avatar
bcbailey65 bcbailey65 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,791

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Now a majority of Americans (56%) say that the proposed new border crossing rules requiring them to have a passport as well as Canadians won't do anything to deter terrorism. So what exactly are the rules for? Paranoia will destroy ya!

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../National/home
U.S. ID card scheme fatal for tourism: survey
BETH GORHAM

Canadian Press

Washington — A bilateral business coalition opposed to U.S. plans for new ID cards at the border says the scheme will erect a wall with grave implications for commerce because most Americans and Canadians won't buy them.

A survey released Tuesday by Zogby International suggests 68 per cent of people in the United States and 54 per cent in Canada would be unlikely to purchase a card to avoid showing a passport at land crossings by the end of next year.

About a third of people surveyed in each country who don't have passports said they'd be less likely to cross the border, a sign of an impending blow to tourism that's been estimated at nearly a billion dollars in the U.S. and twice that in Canada.

"Our borders are going to come to a screaming halt because people don't have what they need," said Lisa Katz, who's with the Detroit Regional Chamber.

"This is a sea change for the Canada-U.S. border. This is a big deal."

The coalition supports using an enhanced driver's licence that includes proof of citizenship as a less costly, more practical alternative and hopes the Canadian government will support the idea.

It should take less time to cross the border than navigating the Berlin Wall during the Cold War, said Representative Jeff Morris, a Washington state Democrat who's among dozens of U.S. legislators worried about the security policy.

"I want to ask President Bush: Please tear down this wall," said Mr. Morris. "No one has proven that this will enhance security in any way."

U.S. officials announced in January that Americans returning home from Canada would have to produce new ID cards costing about $55 (U.S.).

If the policy isn't changed, Ottawa may be forced to produce its own version to avoid a passport requirement by Jan. 1, 2008, under an American law tightening security after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

Canada has said little about what it will do. U.S. opponents are helping officials north of the border to craft their response, said Ms. Katz.

Michael Wilson, who started as ambassador to the U.S. this week, said less-expensive options need to be considered.

Some American legislators and business groups are also demanding a major analysis of potential economic losses from the new identity card but so far the U.S. administration hasn't complied.

Mr. Morris, who predicted the measure could affect the 2010 Olympics in Vancouver, said small towns near the border will be hardest hit.

But while some, like Mr. Morris, would like to see the American security law repealed, others don't think that's realistic.

"We have a security focus (in the U.S.)," said Ms. Katz. "A repeal, to us, isn't a feasible option."

The Zogby survey, commissioned by the coalition of chambers of commerce from both countries, suggested 56 per cent of Americans don't think a special card is necessary to keep the U.S. safe from terrorists.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2006
Gort's Avatar
Gort Gort is offline
President
Badges? We don need no stinkin badges

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: 42.88 85.52
Posts: 10,280

United_States     Germany

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Why would you think that? Your paranoia about why we are doing it hasn't destroyed you.
__________________

The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2006
Blaupunkt69's Avatar
Blaupunkt69 Blaupunkt69 is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Kamloops, Canada
Posts: 241

Canada     Switzerland

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbailey65
We believe in an International Court (currently headed by Louise Arbour, a Canadian).
and she's the mother of an ex gf
__________________
Canada = Mad Cow Disease
USA = Mad Cowboy Disease
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2006
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 5,382

United_States     Connecticut

Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

it takes 2 weeks to get a canadian passport, and $80 to get a canadian passport. With more money you can get it faster... This is hardly some terrible burden, and guess what, after you get your canadian passport you can travel to the rest of the visa waived countries too! Its a good idea to have a passport, regardless, now it might mean a bit of hassle for people who live right on the border as they'll have to carry around a passport, but they can fit in a pocket rather easily, and they'll adjust.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2006
bcbailey65's Avatar
bcbailey65 bcbailey65 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,791

   
Re: U.S. passport rules are 'war on tourism'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thematic-Device
it takes 2 weeks to get a canadian passport, and $80 to get a canadian passport. With more money you can get it faster... This is hardly some terrible burden, and guess what, after you get your canadian passport you can travel to the rest of the visa waived countries too! Its a good idea to have a passport, regardless, now it might mean a bit of hassle for people who live right on the border as they'll have to carry around a passport, but they can fit in a pocket rather easily, and they'll adjust.
A family of four will shell out $320. They won't do this just to cross the border for a day. Therefore, the millions of yearly trips like this that occur now, will be sharply curtailed at a cost of billions to both countries. This will hurt border communities immensely. It's NOT a small burden.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online