Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > International Politics

International Politics A forum to discuss international politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #256 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006
Hank's Avatar
Hank Hank is offline
Secretary of State
Bob (No, not like in the water. It's my name.)

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: springhill,Florida.
Posts: 5,917

United_States     Florida

Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

I have mixed feelings on this one. The decision was 100% right at the time. The sanctions are both a deterrent and assurance that they don’t become to powerful. The world needs policed the same as your neighborhood. (On the other hand, post Castro Cuban cigars are plentiful in Tampa’s Little Cuba. )
__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.
Reply With Quote
  #257 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006
jpsartre12's Avatar
jpsartre12 jpsartre12 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,633

United_States     Michigan

Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma2 View Post
JP, I don't normally acknowledge unnecessarily rude and impolite remarks directed at me. Up until now you wouldn't have known that, so I am just letting you know.
I apologize for your thin skin. Keep making anti-American comments and you'd better grow a shell. I'm certainly not going to let them go unchallenged.
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #258 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006
Calvin X Calvin X is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 605

United_States    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos View Post
From an economics perspective, I tend to treat these economic inefficiencies, as due to politically induced forms of ideology. There is no economic reason for any second world economy to not command economize their way to first world status.
And right here we have the core of your belief system. You cannot hear challanges to it, and thus are unable to defend it. Which is what you need to be able to do because it is a very controvesial belief.
Reply With Quote
  #259 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006
Calvin X Calvin X is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 605

United_States    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma2 View Post
Errr! Calvin, have you checked the Iraq statistics. I don't think Rumsfeld, Bush, Rice et al were focussing on civilian casualties when they invaded that devastated country. If you are going to be make emotive statements condemning laca, at least don't lay yourself open to be called the black kettle.

I think they were.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq

Quote:
Summary of the invasion

Coalition forces managed to topple the government and capture the key cities of a large nation in only 21 days, taking minimal losses while also trying to avoid large civilian deaths and even high numbers of dead Iraqi military forces.
I remember some debate on the avoidance of enemy deaths. THe rational was that since we knew we were going to win and they knew we were going to win, that instead of needing to destroy enemy units that we could just keep them out of contact with their commanders. THen after the US was in control of the country the unharmed Iraqi units would just surrender.

THis level of concern for the enemy soldiers was described as unprecedented.



Furthermore, don't you agree that the "liberation" that laca wants would be a horrible bloodbath and that his lack of concern about the cost reflects badly on him?
Reply With Quote
  #260 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,448

European_Union    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gort View Post
It has nothing to do with this, and the argument Enigma is looking for has been offered already. The embargo is kept for only one reason. Electoral politics. Florida is important in the national races, and the Cuban expat population there is an important part of Florida politics. It is as simple as that.
Okay you lost me completely, it sounds like total gibberish.
__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?
Reply With Quote
  #261 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006
O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
O'Sullivan Bere O'Sullivan Bere is offline
Administrator

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania/Ireland
Posts: 8,139

Pennsylvania     Ireland

Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gort
It has nothing to do with this, and the argument Enigma is looking for has been offered already. The embargo is kept for only one reason. Electoral politics. Florida is important in the national races, and the Cuban expat population there is an important part of Florida politics. It is as simple as that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo View Post
Okay you lost me completely, it sounds like total gibberish.
The US elects its President with the 'electoral college' rather than a straight majority national vote.

Here is a quick background on how this works:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Electoral_College

Florida has a very large population that carries a vast number of 'electoral college' votes in Presidential elections, with the winner of the vote in Florida taking all the electoral votes. In the US, with rare exceptions, the winner of the popular vote in each state takes all the electoral votes of that state (state law determines how their electoral college votes will be cast, but almost all have a 'winner take all' approach).

As an example of this in action, in 2000, Bush's victory in Florida allowed him to take all of Florida's electoral college votes, the total number of which then exceeded Gore's total number he got from states he won, and Bush won the election--all despite the fact that Gore got more overall votes than Bush in the total national tally.

Here is another quick link to show you how this works, citing the 2000 election:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_2000

Given Florida's population size, it also has alot of seats for Congress.

Florida has a large and very politically influential population of Cubans and Cuban-Americans, and this community is, on the whole, extremely anti-Castro. To pass legislation that seems to 'go soft' on Castro and/or befriend him will result in infuriating the Florida Cuban population and their political machines and they will severely punish anyone who makes such decisions. And on the flip side, by giving them their demands on handling Castro, it gets their support.
Reply With Quote
  #262 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
enigma2's Avatar
enigma2 enigma2 is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,108

Australia    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
I apologize for your thin skin. Keep making anti-American comments and you'd better grow a shell. I'm certainly not going to let them go unchallenged.

I don't have a thin-skin. However, I do have a penchant for mutual respect for the other's right to an opposite opinion, along with intelligent and relevant conversation and your post missed out all three.

JP, I know this is the post-modern era which has led to the 'death of the author', but please do not keep accusing me of 'anti-Americanism'. Many times posters on here, particularly when they are losing, can only come back with this sort of all-purpose insult. I am not anti-American. I was asked once if I could pick one person from any era or any time who would it be. JP, I chose Paul Robson. A true American Hero. Although, I do think his life transcended any nationality.
__________________
Lucky is he (sic) who has been able to understand the causes of things
Virgil
Reply With Quote
  #263 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
enigma2's Avatar
enigma2 enigma2 is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,108

Australia    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin X View Post
I think they were.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq



I remember some debate on the avoidance of enemy deaths. THe rational was that since we knew we were going to win and they knew we were going to win, that instead of needing to destroy enemy units that we could just keep them out of contact with their commanders. THen after the US was in control of the country the unharmed Iraqi units would just surrender.

THis level of concern for the enemy soldiers was described as unprecedented.



Furthermore, don't you agree that the "liberation" that laca wants would be a horrible bloodbath and that his lack of concern about the cost reflects badly on him?
Yes, I do agree. I find laca to be an insult to the Cuban people as well as an insult to the inclusive ethos usually promotoed by those who are left-wing.

Just as I condemn the US for its actions, so I would condemn the Cuban government if they ever managed to find some stone-age weapons and callously invaded Florida, or worse, Texas.

If consideration for enemy soldiers were part of the invasion strategy I would be very surprised. If that is so, the facts would have very quickly borne out the huge mistake made. Rumsfeld certainly didn't display any concern in his 'shock and awe' snigger on my TV. And his previous sniggering statement re 'Afghanistan has run out of targets', whereby the lickspittle journalists all laughed, also doesn't demonstrate any humanitarian qualities.

I will not totally condemn force as a necessity. The South African peoples tried every legal way to destroy apartheid. However, every peaceful action was met by a violent reaction. Every attempt to change an unfair law was met by the legislation of an even more draconian law. In the end they had no choice but to turn to force. In the meantime, though, they were declared terrorists and enemies of South Africa, white South Africa that is!

So even though I say Long Live the Revolution, I hope that when the peoples of this world say to the profiteers, arms manufacturers and oppressors - enough, that change will come about by peaceful means. Although, I doubt it!
__________________
Lucky is he (sic) who has been able to understand the causes of things
Virgil
Reply With Quote
  #264 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
Calvin X Calvin X is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 605

United_States    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma2 View Post
Yes, I do agree. I find laca to be an insult to the Cuban people as well as an insult to the inclusive ethos usually promotoed by those who are left-wing.
HA HA!! Good one! Thanks, I get to start my day with a laugh!

Quote:
Just as I condemn the US for its actions, so I would condemn the Cuban government if they ever managed to find some stone-age weapons and callously invaded Florida, or worse, Texas.
But that is my point, according to communist ideology, they want to invade. They see us as their enemy because of who we are, not what we do.

Quote:
If consideration for enemy soldiers were part of the invasion strategy I would be very surprised. If that is so, the facts would have very quickly borne out the huge mistake made. Rumsfeld certainly didn't display any concern in his 'shock and awe' snigger on my TV. And his previous sniggering statement re 'Afghanistan has run out of targets', whereby the lickspittle journalists all laughed, also doesn't demonstrate any humanitarian qualities.
Rhetoric designed to project confidence, the actual implemented plan was as I said. I sourced my point and remember it personally.

Quote:
I will not totally condemn force as a necessity.
Good.
Reply With Quote
  #265 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
jpsartre12's Avatar
jpsartre12 jpsartre12 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,633

United_States     Michigan

Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma2 View Post
I don't have a thin-skin. However, I do have a penchant for mutual respect for the other's right to an opposite opinion, along with intelligent and relevant conversation and your post missed out all three.
I'm growing weary of listening to non-Americans from countries that haven't done 1/10 the good the US has, tell us what's wrong with our country.
Quote:
JP, I know this is the post-modern era which has led to the 'death of the author', but please do not keep accusing me of 'anti-Americanism'. Many times posters on here, particularly when they are losing, can only come back with this sort of all-purpose insult. I am not anti-American.
I've done much more than just level the claim, I've backed it up. Here's a bit of free advice for you. If you don't want to be labeled anti-American then make sure that 95% of your posts aren't bashing the US. It's as simple as that.
I could retaliate against OZ by speaking about the barbaric policies instituted against the Aborigines, but I don't believe in engaging in a Crusade against someone else's country.
Quote:
I was asked once if I could pick one person from any era or any time who would it be. JP, I chose Paul Robson. A true American Hero. Although, I do think his life transcended any nationality.
Wow! There's one American that you like.
And it's Paul RobEson. I'm very familiar with his story since he went to the same college as I did and Rutgers maintains a lot of historical records on him. The Rutgers Choir is even called the "Paul Robeson Choir" and IIRC< there is at least one building named after him on campus.
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #266 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
danielpalos danielpalos is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: US, California
Posts: 2,979

   
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin X View Post
And right here we have the core of your belief system. You cannot hear challanges to it, and thus are unable to defend it. Which is what you need to be able to do because it is a very controvesial belief.
I am only stating facts. It is only ideology that prevents any command economy from legislating its way to first world status; not economics.
Reply With Quote
  #267 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
Wallaroo's Avatar
Wallaroo Wallaroo is offline
Secretary of Defense
Permanently Banned (you wish)

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,448

European_Union    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
The US elects its President with the 'electoral college' rather than a straight majority national vote.

Here is a quick background on how this works:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Electoral_College

Florida has a very large population that carries a vast number of 'electoral college' votes in Presidential elections, with the winner of the vote in Florida taking all the electoral votes. In the US, with rare exceptions, the winner of the popular vote in each state takes all the electoral votes of that state (state law determines how their electoral college votes will be cast, but almost all have a 'winner take all' approach).

As an example of this in action, in 2000, Bush's victory in Florida allowed him to take all of Florida's electoral college votes, the total number of which then exceeded Gore's total number he got from states he won, and Bush won the election--all despite the fact that Gore got more overall votes than Bush in the total national tally.

Here is another quick link to show you how this works, citing the 2000 election:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._pr...election,_2000

Given Florida's population size, it also has alot of seats for Congress.

Florida has a large and very politically influential population of Cubans and Cuban-Americans, and this community is, on the whole, extremely anti-Castro. To pass legislation that seems to 'go soft' on Castro and/or befriend him will result in infuriating the Florida Cuban population and their political machines and they will severely punish anyone who makes such decisions. And on the flip side, by giving them their demands on handling Castro, it gets their support.
Thanks for explaining.

Its really not a good thing if the Cuban population in Florida are powerfull enough to more or less dictate the embargo on Cuba. There's something basically wrong with that and the voting system must be changed.
__________________

It all comes down to this on election day: Are you a racist, or do you look down on spastics?
Reply With Quote
  #268 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
jpsartre12's Avatar
jpsartre12 jpsartre12 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,633

United_States     Michigan

Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallaroo View Post
Thanks for explaining.

Its really not a good thing if the Cuban population in Florida are powerfull enough to more or less dictate the embargo on Cuba. There's something basically wrong with that and the voting system must be changed.
Nothing wrong with the system. It appears that only the Cuban exiles have a strong opinion about the embargo and that opinion isn't overridden by any great desire by the rest of the country to remove sanctions. If it was put to a vote, I'd bet that the general population would be in favor of keeping it.
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #269 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
Calvin X Calvin X is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 605

United_States    
Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos
From an economics perspective, I tend to treat these economic inefficiencies, as due to politically induced forms of ideology. There is no economic reason for any second world economy to not command economize their way to first world status.

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin X
And right here we have the core of your belief system. You cannot hear challanges to it, and thus are unable to defend it. Which is what you need to be able to do because it is a very controvesial belief.

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielpalos View Post
I am only stating facts.

These "facts" are in dispute. This is the underlying differance that is preventing true communication between you and just about everyone else. If you want to communicate your position, this is what you need to discuss, not assume that everyone else already "knows" it.
Reply With Quote
  #270 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006
doniston's Avatar
doniston doniston is offline
Permanently Banned
Just getting better HEH HEH

 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: southern Cal
Posts: 10,548

United_States     United

Re: How world condemns USA embargo on CUBA

Quote:
Originally Posted by enigma2 View Post
As opposed to the US-loving dicators? Not a cogent argument. Especially as you trade every day with people who don't like your form of government, or your government, come to that.
I totally agree, but if I had said that, I would have been "Picking" on him for saying he was wrong HEH HEH.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Digg