If your president meets an American citizen, of course it is domestic affair. If he meets people from outside, then not domestic affair. China have every rights to concern

Subverting China!! Do you know the world "Reciprocal"?

They can be wrong, but not in this matter.

At least China can asphyxiate any of their attempts in international communities. Chinese threat of violence only comes after their unilaterally changing civil war status quo.

Who is "everyone"?? Even continental Europe shows little concern over the missile tests, not to mention the vast majority of African, Latin American, SE Asian and Middle Eastern countries. Stop your attempt to replace "everyone" by a few American puppet states.

America is issuing human rights reports about China, of course it is not American domestic affairs. If America is issueing human rights abuses in America, we don't care.

I am not saying that Nixon is not anti-Communists. China broke up with USSR as early as 1960s. Due to the timing of Nixon's visit in Beijing, Vietnam War might be the most direct stimulation. China is very pragmatic in international affairs. We don't care what your ideology is. We don't like foreign government, especially USA, lecturing about some "democracy" or "freedom" or something else, because it is obviously so hypocritical. China is and will continue to democratize in a speed that is suitable for the majority of the Chinese. America is a very successful country, but China will fail miserably if just copying American systems.

For debris problem, since USA and USSR stoped experiments after having "First Hand" experience of the threat of debris, China will be happy to sign the ban for international space weapon tests. But Bush does not allow, so......

Australia and S Korea might show some independence over American diplomatic control, but still S Korea relies on America heavily. S Korea's concern is also quite moderate.

France and Germany are almost diplomatically quiet compared with the countries that I listed. Indian concern is understandable. Pakistan even supported Tiananmen Incident in Beijing, I think Islamburg is more than happy about Chinese missle tests.

Bullshit. Do you see the US whining when China meets with the leaders of France? It's none of you're damn business if we meet with the Dalai Lama.

Further if whether China tests a weapon isn't our concern, you shouldn't object to US arms deals. I think a number of free PAC-3 systems outside Taipei would be a good way for the US to express its disapproval.

So China was being subverted by what? CSIS? Perhaps the Mounties snuck into China and began spreading out pamphlets.

Considering the Chinese Embassy has been seeking to intimidate Falun Gong members in Canada, and in Taiwan, you wouldn't like what reciprocity actually looked like.

No of course not, by supporting the organization which has killed millions of their countrymen and suppresses their rights, they are taking a perfectly rational approach.

No China's threat of violence comes when they finally admit what everyone wants to know. China is make threats because it knows that it is weak and impotent it just doesn't want its people to know it.

Concern has been expressed by Russia, the UK, the US, Canada, Australia, South Korea. But I guess Russia is a puppet state of the US? Seems to me that is the vast majority of the presence in space.

Of all launches they represent 87%, of currently active satellites, 85%. So perhaps the reason you see these countries complaining, because we actually have a stake in the matter.

TSE - States and Organizations

I thought it was during the 1950's when Stalin was still alive, but anyway, Nixon's visit had some to do with Vietnam, but it was mainly used as a political coup to secure China against the USSR. As the Chinese proverb goes "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."

I believe China's test was a one time affair showing that that it could do what the other superpowers have done. It was mostly for morale with very little strategic importance. As for the ban, I know of no government that is willing to negotiate such a treaty at this present time.

As for democracy, it is a fascinating time to see history in the making in China. I have not known the USA to overtly criticize China about democracy, but what you have to realize is that the US system is very unique. China could learn from the US as well as the US learning from China.

But South Korea, and Australia are not puppet states of the US in any regard as was the same with China and Mongolia. The same goes with Pakistan, India, France, and Germany.

Agreed if any nation that criticizes another nation, that nation will respond. This includes US criticizing China over human rights violations and China then criticizing the US of the same. Just remember, it is part of the game that every nation plays.

You are having a very perverse way of changing the definition, "domestic affair" in mid sentence.

You have the right to complain if you don't want Chinese leaders to meet with French leaders, because this is international affairs, not just Chinese domestic affairs.

If China uses American satellites to do the missile test, then it is ur concern. In the same way, if u sell weapons to Taiwan, then it is our concern. By the way, make sure that Taiwan wants to buy it first. Taiwan might veto buying American stuff for 60 times.

What is the problem with your logic. VOA and RFA is specifically broadcasted to China, and in reciprocal way, China has every right to buy western media based on mutual consent.

We don't care if American Embassy intimidates American criminals.

Since American government has expanded power by racial genocide and slavery, Chinese are as rational as the Americans.

Since China is so weak, Lebannon should not have rejected Chen SB's plane several hours before it landed. London, Frankfurt and Rome should not have rejected TW's "Urgent Landing" requests. Oh, Mexico has just forbidden Chen SB's plane to pass through Mexico air, so that all his political attempts in LA was all destroyed by sudden delay. Chinese people all know that China is only a weak developing country, how can it be compared with the superpowers. China is of course weak nation. We are not global cops.

Give quotation from Russian government's reactions. Otherwise, don't borrow Russia's name. As far as I know, Russian defense minister did not believe American information and is skeptical about China's capabilities. Many retired generals have different opinions. Where is diplomatic concern??

America, SKorea, Japan, Canada, Australia and UK voiced concern to China, they take 42.5% of the world satellites. Stop borrowing Russia's name in ur bullying, and stop using "international community".

Actually, Russian and China used to be willing to negotiate such a treaty, but Bush did not want to.

That pesky representative government!

__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon

Questions deepen over satellite-killer test - Space News - MSNBC.com

So some Russian Generals dislike the tests at their face, others think that they are exaggerated and China didn't target a satellite, but if they did then they'd have a problem with it. Seems fair to chalk that up in the criticism category.

Now, China has admitted. Do you see any Russian who have a problem?? Stop living in ur imagination!!

From my understanding, Chairman Mao never trusted the Russians, particularily Stalin; and it remains true to this day. China and Russia have developed some cooperation military, mainly as a counter to US military presence in the region, but that is all. However, China and the US have more in common economically than militarily as compared with Russia or Europe and should continue that cooperation despite the test.