Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > International Politics

International Politics A forum to discuss international politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
ThorHammer's Avatar
ThorHammer ThorHammer is offline
Secretary of State
Victory or Valhalla!

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: What used to be America
Posts: 4,643

Minnesota     Germany

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Mille,
Where did you get your numbers?
__________________
There can be no bystanders in the battle for survival. Anyone who will not fight by your side is an enemy you must crush.

We are at war with forces too terrible to comprehend. We cannot afford mercy for any of its victims too weak to take the correct course. Mercy destroys us; it weakens us and saps our resolve. Put aside all such thoughts. They are not worthy of those in the service of country.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MilleVanille View Post
That is World Bank prognosis, it is always fake.
Well, I am no great fan of the world bank, but accusing them of using fake data is a bit extreme.

Quote:
Nope, in nominal $ it will be over 1 trln, and by PPR it will be about 2 trln.
Nominal GDP? That includes inflation, and so is worthless for comparative analysis. A 2 trillion figure for PPR? Where are you getting that?

Quote:
The economical growth will be higher than in 2006 (it was 6,7%, World Bank prognosed 5.2%), this year it was prognosed 6,5%, but latest prognosis say that it will be higher close or higher than 7% (World Bank prognosed 5.1% of growth).
Yes, certainly Russia is experiencing very strong growth. That is a good sign.

Quote:
Please don't bring World Bank prognosis's digits here, they are biased and never close to real one. Over 7 years, World Bank prognoses much lower (-1,5-2%) Russia's economical growth than it really is.
Well, on the issue of prognostication, I would agree with you: but we are not talking about advance estimates, but data for recent years.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is online now
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,200

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

I think MV is trying to include the money made from identity theft and intellectual property theft. Those really seem to be the only products Russia has, except maybe for mediocre vodka.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
I think MV is trying to include the money made from identity theft and intellectual property theft. Those really seem to be the only products Russia has, except maybe for mediocre vodka.
Not true and not fair. Oil alone is bringing in a great deal of revenue. And Russia is very rich in natural resources. They also have a highly trained and well-educated work force, especially in science and technology.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
ThorHammer's Avatar
ThorHammer ThorHammer is offline
Secretary of State
Victory or Valhalla!

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: What used to be America
Posts: 4,643

Minnesota     Germany

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
Of course, priniciple is something else, and it would mean dying for principle.
and I would be ok with that. Though, I would much rather make my enemy die for his.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
However, I just don't see a way to defend them unless Europe came to their aid - or, at the very least, did not oppose American aid.
You raise some very good points. However, I don't see a unified response from Europe; either for or against becoming involved. I would expect Finland, and possibly Sweden, to get involved. If not with military participation, then with logistical support.

You are correct though. Without an immediate military response from a major European power (UK?) Russian victory would be a foregone conclusion. Anything less would simply be a speed-bump. Even then, that immediate military response would more than likely be a delaying action until large US forces arrive.
__________________
There can be no bystanders in the battle for survival. Anyone who will not fight by your side is an enemy you must crush.

We are at war with forces too terrible to comprehend. We cannot afford mercy for any of its victims too weak to take the correct course. Mercy destroys us; it weakens us and saps our resolve. Put aside all such thoughts. They are not worthy of those in the service of country.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
and I would be ok with that. Though, I would much rather make my enemy die for his.
Well, I would tend to agree with you: but I think it would be difficult to convince many American families of that.

Quote:
You raise some very good points. However, I don't see a unified response from Europe; either for or against becoming involved. I would expect Finland, and possibly Sweden, to get involved. If not with military participation, then with logistical support.
I think you might be right on the logistical support. Of course, Finland might be putting themselves in a desperate position if they helped out: they barely escaped Soviet occupation. They do have a very impressive history of defending themselves.

As for Sweden.....is there anything they would fight for? They are the distilled essence of neutrality.

I think Europe will probably remain neutral - although I still have hopes that something remains of honor and bravery.

Quote:
You are correct though. Without an immediate military response from a major European power (UK?) Russian victory would be a foregone conclusion. Anything less would simply be a speed-bump. Even then, that immediate military response would more than likely be a delaying action until large US forces arrive.
That would mean a war without end. Russia is enormous and has an endless supply of resources. All of our firepower would be worthless.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
erikvv's Avatar
erikvv erikvv is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,461

Netherlands     European_Union

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

The nations of the EU would never let it happen. plus if Russia were to mobilize its troops it would lead to an arms race that Russia cannot win.

defense spending of EU: €213 billion
defense spending of russia: €23,8 billion
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by erikvv View Post
The nations of the EU would never let it happen.
What does that mean? How would they stop it?

Quote:
plus if Russia were to mobilize its troops it would lead to an arms race that Russia cannot win.
An arms race? The invasion of the Baltic states would happen so quickly, the arms race would be irrelevant. Once the troops are in Vilnius and Riga, we are talking about old-fashioned combat.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
erikvv's Avatar
erikvv erikvv is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,461

Netherlands     European_Union

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Quote:
What does that mean? How would they stop it?
We would have air domination in a matter of days.

Quote:
An arms race? The invasion of the Baltic states would happen so quickly, the arms race would be irrelevant. Once the troops are in Vilnius and Riga, we are talking about old-fashioned combat.
It would be old-fashioned commie butt kicking - hollywood movie style

Last edited by erikvv; 07-05-2007 at 11:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
ThorHammer's Avatar
ThorHammer ThorHammer is offline
Secretary of State
Victory or Valhalla!

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: What used to be America
Posts: 4,643

Minnesota     Germany

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
....although I still have hopes that something remains of honor and bravery
Me too man. I am a bit of an optimist as far as this is concerned. I feel Europe would suprise us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
That would mean a war without end. Russia is enormous and has an endless supply of resources. All of our firepower would be worthless.
In such a scenario the US government would have to sell the concept of total war to the American people, and on a scale not seen since WW2. Probably to an even greater extent. Since Russia would undoubtedly go to the same footing, anything less from us would mean defeat. 10 years ago I would have said that wouldn't be much of a problem. Now, it is totally different ball game. It is not that we are militarily incapable, but I don't think the American people are mentally prepared for what would be needed, let alone willing to go to those lengths.
__________________
There can be no bystanders in the battle for survival. Anyone who will not fight by your side is an enemy you must crush.

We are at war with forces too terrible to comprehend. We cannot afford mercy for any of its victims too weak to take the correct course. Mercy destroys us; it weakens us and saps our resolve. Put aside all such thoughts. They are not worthy of those in the service of country.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by erikvv View Post
We would have air domination in a matter of days.
Air domination? Are you telling me that the EU air force would engage in an air battle with Russia?! How would that be received by the population and the media, which are overwhelmingly pacifist?


Quote:
It would be old-fashioned commie butt kicking - hollywood movie style
What a funny, funny man you are.....
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
erikvv's Avatar
erikvv erikvv is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,461

Netherlands     European_Union

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Quote:
Air domination? Are you telling me that the EU air force would engage in an air battle with Russia?! How would that be received by the population and the media, which are overwhelmingly pacifist?
pff our afghan soldiers dont dare wipe their asses without air support. I think you'll see that pacifist mentality changing pretty quickly in the case of an invasion.

Besides what would be pacifist in creating extra victims by engaging in man-to-man combat? with air domination the russian army would be immobilized and brought to its knees quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Me too man. I am a bit of an optimist as far as this is concerned. I feel Europe would suprise us.
We can always hope.

Quote:
In such a scenario the US government would have to sell the concept of total war to the American people, and on a scale not seen since WW2. Probably to an even greater extent. Since Russia would undoubtedly go to the same footing, anything less from us would mean defeat. 10 years ago I would have said that wouldn't be much of a problem. Now, it is totally different ball game. It is not that we are militarily incapable, but I don't think the American people are mentally prepared for what would be needed, let alone willing to go to those lengths.
Agreed in full.

I really do believe we are heading for a new isolationism. I don't think it will be the result of a conscious policy change, but will be a response to public disgust with Iraq, public disgust and weariness with anti-Americanism and a new urgency regarding domestic issues.

Also, I believe the great gulf between the US and Europe would make it impossible. The anti-Americanism that is so rampant now would explode on a scale that we have not seen before if Americans came to the aid of any nation that is the target of a military attack. Demonstrations against Americans in countries only a few miles from the scene of the conflict would be devastating for morale.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
Tim's Avatar
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,427

United_States     United

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by erikvv View Post
pff our afghan soldiers dont dare wipe their asses without air support. I think you'll see that pacifist mentality changing pretty quickly in the case of an invasion.
Well, you make an interesting point. I just don't see Europeans moving away from pacifism (especially Germans). But as a European you would know better than I would.

(I assume you mean this as a serious comment - not sarcasm.)

Quote:
Besides what would be pacifist in creating extra victims by engaging in man-to-man combat? with air domination the russian army would be immobilized and brought to its knees quickly.
I don't know about that one. The Russian army always surprises its opponents. No air battle, however impressive, could stop the army from occupying at least Estonia.
__________________
"Our fears in Banquo
Stick deep; in his royalty of nature
Reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares;
And, to that dauntless temper of his mind,
He hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour
To act in safety."

Macbeth 3:1
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007
erikvv's Avatar
erikvv erikvv is online now
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,461

Netherlands     European_Union

Re: Russia - „The Third Empire“

Tim I dont think youre right. There is support from most governements and the population for the war in afghanistan which is considered an american war. We would be happy to recieve and give any aid when the cause is just.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version