Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net
Last edited by anobsitar; 12-14-2009 at 11:43 PM.
For example we lost this war because the government of Afghanistan is a criminal government. What would you say if Germans would attack Italy to free it from the dictatorship of Berlusconi (or maybe also to help Berlusconi - it's only an example)? In this case even the enemies of Berlusconi in Italy would become enemies of Germans, isn't it? If someone is governed from criminals he prefers his own criminals and not foreign criminals.
Second example: We lost this war in Afghanistan because Taliban fought against drugs in Afghanistan - while today Afganistan is not only the greatest drug-producer of the world - even about 10% of all men in Afghanistan became drug-addicted. Afghans are earning a lot of money with drugs - while drugs are making them helpless the same time. "We" are killing their vital energy although no one likes really to do so - but indeed "we" are doing it.
Third example: We are also killing all prices in Afghanistan because of our "richdom" although we don't have the money to do war ourselves. We need debts to do so. That's also crazy. It seems some people in Afghanistan today are able to earn a lot of money with all kinds of nonsense - but it seems Afghans are not able anymore to earn good money with useful work.
Another example? ... I'm sure I can find some more examples - but I guess all this examples will only show that the western world is the problem it doesn't like to speak about. We are doing something what Americans are calling "war" without transparency and without measurement of results. If I'm thinking about how lots and lots of brave Afghans risked their life in the elections a few years ago - and what a desaster the last elections were ... - does really anyone need more informations to see that it makes absolutely no sense to sink down in this warswamp? The argument "war", "knock down" is always an unbelieveable stupid argument what shows only the stupidity of the waractor.
Last edited by anobsitar; 12-15-2009 at 03:39 AM.
Nevertheless this old man said to me the best three years in his life was the time he was a pow in Oklahoma where the red indians lived. I don't think someone is able to say today the same about the concentration camp Guantanamo or other unknown concentration camps of the USA. It seems in the last 60 years the USA learned a lot - but is it still on the right way? I doubt about if I hear so many members of "butterfly amarments" - oh sorry: "think tanks". I doubt about if I hear from 'lying spaghetti monsters' and its nearly impossible if I had to hear all this pnacistic imperial statements full of hate in the times when the war and terror propagandist Bush was president of the USA.
Whatever: Are you able to explain to me why a completly unkown very old man says to me in a supermarket - where I helped him to find something - "I was most happy when I was for three years a prisoner of war in Oklahoma where the red indians lived"? I asked him nothing - but he said this to me without any reason to do so. I guess the answer is in a spiritual way very easy: For him I was a kind of red indian although I'm blond and blueeyed. I did him something good and so he remembered the red indians he met in this time. And maybe he felt that this was important for me to know and so he gave his public testimony for the USA and for the red indians living in Oklahoma.
So if you doubt that I'm a red indian you are wrong: I am a red indian although I'm not a native North American child.
Last edited by anobsitar; 12-15-2009 at 05:26 AM.
sorry dude i'm just not buying it. that is not proof of why youre a red indian. because youre not. youre caucasian, its how you were born, deal with it. sorry if you wanna be running dog or what the fuck ever but youre not.
i'm also not taking a conversation you supposedly had with a possibly fictional character in a supermarket as anything other than a boldfaced grasping lie. youre really reaching here you know?
Not to long ago Anobistar was absolutely sure that a person he had never met nor that he had any information about (me) was not Dutch.
This is somewhat like that. If he claims that he's a red indian, let him. There's no way for you to disprove it and he shouldn't have to prove it.
Also: who cares?
I am pretty sure he is Saxon. Anyways, as you say Vincent, who cares? Just smile and nod
Last edited by anobsitar; 12-15-2009 at 12:21 PM.
If you were I you would know why it is important to do so.And if i were you i really wouldn't point fingers with the whole gas chambers thing :rolleyes:
the difference being we use the death penalty for legitimate reasons IE punishing murderers and traitors and yall used it to commit genocide and normal murder willy nilly during a war for conquest. quite the comparision youve got there.