alot of threads on all of this , seems to me its just another dem flavor of the month issue

both parties have done this but its good to see our law makers waste fucking time grandstanding on a issue like this

You may be correct on this, I don't have the dates of the firings, I'll try to look them up later.

I didn't say the president don't have the right to fire the FPs, I just said it looks
alittle odd to do so in the last two years and after the right of the Senate to confirm them was removed.

Complete unadulterated partisan drivel. Thank you for providing an example of this;

Now for anyone who's actually interested in the truth here it is;

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia...sa.htm#3-2.120

Seems to me we have the rabid liberal loonies pandering for another 'bush broke the law' story. Liberals are sick twisted individuals.

Varus

What political reasons would those be? Sounds to me like each and every one was terminated for cause. Furthermore, it is no more "unprecedented" then the dismisal of EVERY FP for political reasons (i.e., delaying the indictment of much-needed House ally Dan Rostenkowski).

__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

hahahahaha what a load..you'll take stab at the most twisted logic you can to make clinton look rosey and bush darth vader.....you really didn't mean this right? this is toungue in cheek? you're making yourself look follish...sorry but please...this is to much even for you.

__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor

Little_Acorn: I'm here to show the whole world and God just exactly how DUMB you are. "Current Situation Is Distinct From Clinton Firings of US Attrorneys"

Now sit down and shut up.

__________________
"Tomorrow, you're all going to wake up in a Brave New World, a world where the Constitution gets trampled by an army of terrorist clones created in a stem cell research laboratory, run by homosexual doctors who sterilize their instruments over burning American flags."

No Link?

OpinionJournal - Featured Article

I remember the big deal this was back when klinton fired all of them. In fact, it was this single move that got me to start distrusting him.


By the way, another poster in another thread posted this excellent piece of information:
USAM 3-2.000 United States Attorneys, AUSAs, SAUSAs, and the AGAC

Kramer

__________________
“It's time to admit that public education operates like a planned economy, a bureaucratic system in which everybody's role is spelled out in advance and there are few incentives for innovation and productivity. It's no surprise that our school system doesn't improve; it more resembles the communist economy than our own market economy."
Albert Shanker, former president of the American Federation of Teachers

Little-Acorn: I'm doing this just because I purely LOOOOVE pointing out how stupid mindless Clinton-bashing is. Read it and weep. "Current Situation Is Distinct From Clinton Firing of US Attorneys"

Now sit down and shut up. This is only--what?---the THIRD thread you've introduced about this non-issue?

__________________
"Tomorrow, you're all going to wake up in a Brave New World, a world where the Constitution gets trampled by an army of terrorist clones created in a stem cell research laboratory, run by homosexual doctors who sterilize their instruments over burning American flags."

Only one problem, it is a distinction without a difference, and it is factually in error. Prior to Clinton there were never mass firings, most were allowed to fill out their terms, and new administrations merely refrained from reappointing them. Clinton took the entirely unprecedented step of simultaneously firing ALL of them. Bush's actions are no more "unprecedented" than Clinton's.

The question then becomes which is more onerous, the volume, or the timing? I would argue that if there is nothing wrong with mass firings in principle (as the Clinton defenders would have us believe), what difference does it make WHEN a President chooses to exercise their right as the head of the Executive branch to do so?

__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

You guys really are stupid. And desperate. Here's the scoop, porcupine; read it and weep. "Current Situation is Distinct From Clinton Firings of US Attorneys."

Now sit down and shut up...

__________________
"Tomorrow, you're all going to wake up in a Brave New World, a world where the Constitution gets trampled by an army of terrorist clones created in a stem cell research laboratory, run by homosexual doctors who sterilize their instruments over burning American flags."

Now that this scandal has reached up into the White House, and papers from coast to coast are calling for Gonzales' tainted scalp, the cheap-labor Republicans are frantic to try and distract people from the illegality, the treachery and the political motivation of these eight attorney firings.

Don't believe the hype...

__________________
"Tomorrow, you're all going to wake up in a Brave New World, a world where the Constitution gets trampled by an army of terrorist clones created in a stem cell research laboratory, run by homosexual doctors who sterilize their instruments over burning American flags."

im still standing and i wont shut up

Do you have a comment on any part of what I said or are you just here to mock and make YOURSELF look foolish.

Hopefully Imperator will read your link and learn about how it works so he can understand what is happening instead of lazily mocking posts he doesn't understand.

Prior to Clinton the attorneys never refused to hand in their resignations as 200 years of tradition has had them do.