Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Judiciary A forum to discuss court decisions and the judicial system in general |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
I've deleted several posts for being off topic. Please be mindful of the subject when posting and stay on topic. Thanks.
__________________
New to the forum? Check out our Newbie's Guide! Interested in supporting USPO? Click here! |
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
As for legal intrepreatation, SCOTUS looks at precedent from previous rulings, the original intent of the Constitution, and to the application of the law. See Mulbury v Madison for more info. |
|
||||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
The law does not have an exception for the health of the mother clause.
In the past this would have been enough to doom it. The belief of many was that this clause was left out on purpose, so that the court could strike down the law. This would give the right a symbolic victory (We passed the Partial Birth Abortion Ban), without energizing the womens right movement on the left (relax ladies, the court struck it down). What happened is that the right now has the bar set higher, to fire up the Pro-Life vote, they need to call for widening the ban on abortion. Which will only further energize the Women's Rights voters on this issue, especially in the race for the White House in 2008.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.” Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776 "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics" FDR's second Inaugural Address |
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
But rules are rules are rules are rules.
|
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Any plans for the May Day holiday (or are you still in the US)?
|
|
||||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
A zygote represents human life. A person whose brain is rotted away and is sustained merely by life support represents human life. No one argues that these things/people are alive or that they are not of the human species. The argument is over what specimens of human life are to be granted "human rights". |
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
A person whose brain has rotted away is still a human being and so is different from a zygote or a foetus.
__________________
"There were no D-Day Heroes in 1973" - Cold Chisel Khe Sanh |
|
||||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
The debate is over which collections of living human tissue we legally recognize as having rights. Quote:
In saying that the brain-dead individual is a human being and the fetus is not, are you saying anything other than that the brain-dead individual has rights not recognized as belonging to the fetus? But that's the entire point of the debate; what rights should be recognized as belonging to unborn humans. |
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
__________________
"There were no D-Day Heroes in 1973" - Cold Chisel Khe Sanh |
|
||||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Diuretic, THAT is the entire abortion debate! If everyone considered "unborn human" an oxymoron, then we wouldn't have a debate. Many people (myself included) don't think its that simple.
|
|
|||
|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
As you can see from my post numbers, I'm new here. This is a really long post, but I think it relevent to this conversation. I just want to say a thank you to the poster that directed me to this site, I'm impressed by the thinking people from all sides of the issues. For those reading this particular post, while I am pro-life, I'm not of the religious right:
The Corner on National Review Online Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|