Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > Judiciary
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Judiciary A forum to discuss court decisions and the judicial system in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,263

United_States    
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
It's a relatively fluid term. It usually refers to people from Spanish speaking countries in the western hemisphere. Occasionally it includes Spain, but not generally.

Latinos or Latin-Americans include Brazilians. Sometimes Haitians.

Imperator just doesn't know what he's talking about on the issue.
I think I have explained my reasoning/view and how I got there, but thanx for the thoughtful response.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 15,984

United_States     Colombia

re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
I think I have explained my reasoning/view and how I got there, but thanx for the thoughtful response.
Ethnic identification is not necessarily a reasoned process.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,263

United_States    
Re: Obama picks Sotomayor for Supreme Court

hi folks, this is the third thread on this, we have rolled up the other 2, please check the forum for your topics, before starting a thread etc....thx.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,263

United_States    
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
Ethnic identification is not necessarily a reasoned process.
I agree, thats why I explained myself.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
jviehe's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 15,473

United_States    
Re: Obama picks Sotomayor for Supreme Court

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
hi folks, this is the third thread on this, we have rolled up the other 2, please check the forum for your topics, before starting a thread etc....thx.
I did, but I only checked Breaking News before I posted. That seemed the logical place. Perhaps this should be moved there?
__________________
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
jviehe's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 15,473

United_States    
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
Ethnic identification is not necessarily a reasoned process.
I actually just looked this up, because its an interesting topic, race vs ethnicity vs culture. To apply it to this nominee, what makes her hispanic and why does it matter? Her parents came from Peurto Rico, that would make her Hispanic on the face of it, but does she actually have some cultural attachment to being hispanic? And does that matter to being a SC judge?
__________________
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: US
Posts: 834

United_States     India

re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHighForester View Post
Judge Sotomayor has impressive experience at both district and appellate level. She also has drawn positive attention from BOTH parties.



Obama picks Sotomayor for Supreme Court - White House- msnbc.com

That quote is a sentiment that both conservatives and civil libertarians should respect. However, given the political temper of the times, I expect some opposition to her appointment to arise.
Sounds good to me. Yeah, I expect perfunctory complaints from the sore losers/moonbats, but it's not going to matter. I'm waiting for the next appointment, or 2!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Jason Marcel's Avatar
Vice President
MovieJay

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 6,633
Blog Entries: 5

Canada     United_States

re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

She's an excellent pick.

The GOP is tainted by a cancer of indignation and dislike for practically everything, so they'll conveniently overlook the fact that her only ruling on abortion upholds the Bush admin's "Mexico City Policy" that states that foreign organizations that receive public funds can not use them to perform or encourage abortion. I disagree with her position on that one, but I can respect it.

Her "Pappas v. Giuliani" decision was courageous and logical, and you really can't argue that she took the "liberal" position on that one either.

She's considered a centrist in like 10 publications and associations.

Orrin Hatch and other Republicans voted 67-29 in her confirmation in 1998, so it should be a breeze for her, although since the right is filled with people who have been ready to "Just Say No!" weeks ago despite not even knowing who the choice was, she'll be lucky to crack 70-75 votes when 20 or so years ago this kind of nominee would have won at least 85-90 votes.

Good pick overall, and she really came off both educated and with a common touch in her little speech today.
__________________
“The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil."-Sarah Palin, not having a clue once again about what she is talking about.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
goober's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 12,183

   
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

I think she will be confirmed, the GOP will oppose her, but only token opposition, why would they waste what little political capital they have on something like this where they don't have any leverage.
They can't filibuster, they can't tie her up in committee, and they can't win a floor vote.
What they can do is further alienate the hispanic community, because they will be the ones that saying "sure a Latina can graduate Summa Cum Laude, attend the best law schools in the country, sit on the bench as a trial judge, as an appeals judge, spend more time on the bench than any current Supreme Court Justice spent before being selected, but if she thinks her perspective as a Latina has a place on the Supreme Court, we say NO!"

The very things they will hold up as "controversy", are things that will drive women and Latinos further into the Democratic fold, and their only appeal will be limited to the shrinking Republican base.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,263

United_States    
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Marcel View Post
She's an excellent pick.

The GOP is tainted by a cancer of indignation and dislike for practically everything, so they'll conveniently overlook the fact that her only ruling on abortion upholds the Bush admin's "Mexico City Policy" that states that foreign organizations that receive public funds can not use them to perform or encourage abortion. I disagree with her position on that one, but I can respect it.

Her "Pappas v. Giuliani" decision was courageous and logical, and you really can't argue that she took the "liberal" position on that one either.

She's considered a centrist in like 10 publications and associations.

Orrin Hatch and other Republicans voted 67-29 in her confirmation in 1998, so it should be a breeze for her, although since the right is filled with people who have been ready to "Just Say No!" weeks ago despite not even knowing who the choice was, she'll be lucky to crack 70-75 votes when 20 or so years ago this kind of nominee would have won at least 85-90 votes.

Good pick overall, and she really came off both educated and with a common touch in her little speech today.

yes not like the party of no ala alito and roberts...but wait, left right, right wrong, got it....
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
jviehe's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 15,473

United_States    
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

I would be interested in her backstory as an example of how someone can be poor and yet end up a Supreme Court justice. We keep being told by the liberals how everyone succesful is born into it, yet we now have a President and Supreme Court nominee who were born poor. Did they succeed because the govt gave it to them, or because they earned it?
__________________
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
RFK1968's Avatar
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 906

United_States     Missouri

re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
I think she will be confirmed, the GOP will oppose her, but only token opposition, why would they waste what little political capital they have on something like this where they don't have any leverage.
They can't filibuster, they can't tie her up in committee, and they can't win a floor vote.
What they can do is further alienate the hispanic community, because they will be the ones that saying "sure a Latina can graduate Summa Cum Laude, attend the best law schools in the country, sit on the bench as a trial judge, as an appeals judge, spend more time on the bench than any current Supreme Court Justice spent before being selected, but if she thinks her perspective as a Latina has a place on the Supreme Court, we say NO!"

The very things they will hold up as "controversy", are things that will drive women and Latinos further into the Democratic fold, and their only appeal will be limited to the shrinking Republican base.
In my opinion, this is the only bearing her race plays at all in this issue. Ethnicity and race are largely social constructs, in my opinion, anyway, so the only thing I really care about with regard to her ethnicity is how her proponents and opponents choose to maneuver her confirmation politically. Like Goober says, many hispanics will undoubtedly wonder how so many conservatives could oppose a woman with her credentials. That being said, Democrats are largely responsible for any fights put up against their Supreme Court nominees. Republicans have almost always been of the mindset, "To the winner goes the spoils." Democrats fought Roberts. They fought Alito. Now, their chickens are likely going to come home to roost.

BTW, what's the over/under on how long it takes Rush to (#1) ignore her qualifications and declare this pick was about nothing more than race, and (#2) complain that every conservative that opposes her is going to be labeled a racist?
__________________
"The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised.”
- George Will
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,263

United_States    
re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
I think she will be confirmed, the GOP will oppose her, but only token opposition, why would they waste what little political capital they have on something like this where they don't have any leverage.
They can't filibuster, they can't tie her up in committee, and they can't win a floor vote.
What they can do is further alienate the hispanic community, because they will be the ones that saying "sure a Latina can graduate Summa Cum Laude, attend the best law schools in the country, sit on the bench as a trial judge, as an appeals judge, spend more time on the bench than any current Supreme Court Justice spent before being selected, but if she thinks her perspective as a Latina has a place on the Supreme Court, we say NO!"

The very things they will hold up as "controversy", are things that will drive women and Latinos further into the Democratic fold, and their only appeal will be limited to the shrinking Republican base.

uh huh, maybe you ought to take a stroll through past nominations goober, if there is one subject on which dems have no credible standing its this one. But hey lets not let reality get in the way.


Quote:
alienate the hispanic community

don't make me laugh goober ever hear of Miguel Estrada?
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Last edited by Imperator; 05-26-2009 at 12:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,829

United_States     Virginia

re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiggidy View Post
I'm tired of these picks that cause controversy over race/gender.

I would much rather the news report her history on how she rules according to the constitution.

Is she an activist?

Does she follow the written laws (or try to interpret the law in the ways she wants?)


unabashadly so. 3 of her 4 cases ultimately reviewed by the SCOTUS were found to be lacking in simple interpretation of law.

compelling story but she's a shitty judge.
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009
RFK1968's Avatar
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 906

United_States     Missouri

re: Sotomayor chosen as SC nominee (academic discussion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
I would be interested in her backstory as an example of how someone can be poor and yet end up a Supreme Court justice. We keep being told by the liberals how everyone succesful is born into it, yet we now have a President and Supreme Court nominee who were born poor. Did they succeed because the govt gave it to them, or because they earned it?
Oh, really?

Please provide absolutely any kind of evidence that any liberal has ever said that everyone successful is born into it.
__________________
"The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised.”
- George Will
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online