Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Military Debriefing A forum devoted to discussion on military technology, strategy & tactics, international rivalries, and history. |
| View Poll Results: Who would win between the USA and the rest of the world | |||
| The USA |
|
23 | 15.23% |
| The rest of the world |
|
53 | 35.10% |
| Stalemate |
|
7 | 4.64% |
| Mutually Assured Destruction |
|
68 | 45.03% |
| Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Shit, I'm sorry for even mentioning the raffle......Dang but people get upset over silly stuff..
For those who don't understand....There were 4000 tickets sold for $10...The ticket allowed you to eat all you want and drink all of the beer that you wanted..There were 6-guns and 20- $200 prizes....The money left over went to benefit of the local fire and emergency rescue center.
__________________
Anyone who thinks freedom comes cheap, please put the blindfold on and stand against the wall. IT IS TIME for Americans to take back the country and start a new government. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
Well, every Finn used to carry Puukko (every trooper still do), and even today most `violent´ fights/crimes include use of one. ..but nice pointer. You use Bowies? |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
Does this work?http://www.iisakkijarvenpaa.fi/images2005/05_leuku.jpg ..and: http://www.iisakkijarvenpaa.fi/image...09_perinne.jpg Edit: Oh, and if we feel that any normal citizen has no need for gun, then our laws fit quite nicely. Hunters and woodsmen, marksmen, soldiers and such do have a reson for owning a gun, thus they havee it easily. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
__________________
Anyone who thinks freedom comes cheap, please put the blindfold on and stand against the wall. IT IS TIME for Americans to take back the country and start a new government. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Thank you.
As you take pride on your guns, we feel the same about our Puukko-knives. You can quite easily tell number of things about induviduals knife. More decorations, bronze and silver in the handles and sheats, the more wealthy household. If intrested, this sums up information quite nicely. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puukko My puukko being rather plain:http://www.lahjamaailma.fi/WebRoot/L...kipuukko_m.jpg |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
because it is illegal here to carry anything in a public place that can be used to hurt another person. even a laser pointer is illegal and mentioned specifically in the law. (järjestyslaki 10§) But you can carry a knife if it has some historical significance (12§) or if you are going to sell it or if you are going to put it on display. But of course it is legal to own one. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
Although illegal to carry, don't ask how many walk about with their own blade.. Carpenters, soldiers, construction workers, hunters and farmers can carry one around in sight without anyone paying any heed. Edit: Where's your Kurssipuukko then? |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
I'm just a plain old foot solider, they didn't give me such a thing as puukko, cutbacks in the military you see. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
Waddya think about the topic in hand? Come on, I think we could use Finnish political view on the matter aswell. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
On the matter of having weapons.. I haven't yet needed one, ever. Unless you count the times I needed knife and matches to make a fire.. one or two and even that was in the army, where I carried that useless piece of metal (thats what it felt like during the marches) some people call an assault rifle around anyway. For what would an honest person need a weapon, unless one is put to a finnish court where they turn the victim into a criminal... so maybe it would be useful to get a gun after all. Using a knife against foreign invaders with smart bombs? Uh.. well there must be some people around that would do just that.. in case the invader would come from Russia that is. Old saying "I'll defend my country no matter what part of east the enemy attacks from". |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Seeing as how you are one of only 3 or 4 countries that have defeated a global superpower
yes please lets here your ideas![]() Also remember we have our own version. It may not be a stylish as yours, but it has a certain lethality to it
__________________
![]() The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu Last edited by Gort; 11-19-2006 at 03:48 PM. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Quote:
Well Russia was kind of a superpower in 1939. So the american marketplace of ideas really does mean the AMERICAN marketplace of ideas. |
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
No no, just the U.S. against the world. I do know that M.A.D. would occur in that scenario -in real life.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: USA vs the world, who would win
Actually Dr. I find this thread to be assenine so I am just having fun. No insult intended. I actually do think that while the USSR at the time wasn't a superpower, that part was in jest, that it was still amazing what your country was able to do.
__________________
![]() The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|