Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Military Debriefing
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Military Debriefing A forum devoted to discussion on military technology, strategy & tactics, international rivalries, and history.

View Poll Results: How you think we should attack IRAN?
Air Force air assult 4 13.33%
Air Force and Navy Missle Strikes 17 56.67%
Navy Missle Strikes 0 0%
All out war and hell with ground forces 9 30.00%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,461

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Radio attempts can be made, but they should not be relied upon. If a hostile aircraft is raised on a radio call, and is asked if they're friend or foe, it would be pretty stupid to assume they'll respond honestly.
don't you military fools have your long extensive system of codes and passwords and secret ID's. ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post

Having no knowledge of anything "military", though, I can understand why you would think those two things should be viable options...
i was merely brainstorming alternative ideas. never did i assert they are absolutely viable.

the principle still stands that assuming a plane is an enemy because its little box didn't say the right thing is a little off.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #242 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
i was merely brainstorming alternative ideas. never did i assert they are absolutely viable.
"Brainstorm"?

Man, that was barely a squall...

Quote:
the principle still stands that assuming a plane is an enemy because its little box didn't say the right thing is a little off.
For someone who''s never served his country, I can see how you would reach that conclusion.

It's not "off" at all. One of the reasons IFF was developed was because waiting until you can actually see the plane is a stupid idea...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
  #243 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,461

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
.
For someone who''s never served his country, I can see how you would reach that conclusion.
I have served my country in a way far more meaningful than the military sheep have.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #244 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
don't you military fools have your long extensive system of codes and passwords and secret ID's. ?
Yes, and when we get done with basic training, we're all issued a super-secret decoder ring, too.

Your "military fools" name calling is not appreciated, although it does illustrate your disdain for people braver than you...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
  #245 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
I have served my country in a way far more meaningful than the military sheep have.
Bullshit. You're a lib. Accordingly, the only one you wish to serve is yourself...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
  #246 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,461

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Bullshit. You're a lib. Accordingly, the only one you wish to serve is yourself...
then i shall make a fine american.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #247 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,461

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Yes, and when we get done with basic training, we're all issued a super-secret decoder ring, too.

Your "military fools" name calling is not appreciated, although it does illustrate your disdain for people braver than you...
what the hell does doing whatever your told have to do with bravery?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #248 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
what the hell does doing whatever your told have to do with bravery?
You're in the pathetic position of never being able to understand anything about bravery...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
  #249 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Mushroom's Avatar
Governor

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Al-Audib, Qatar
Posts: 545
Blog Entries: 1

United_States     Qatar

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
and this is the only method used to determine if a plane is friendly?? no radio attempts, etc, visual contact of the plane...

Remember, you have also been tracking it.

But if an aircraft is comming at you ar Mach 2, without IFF identification, you assume it is hostile. Because for one, friendly aircraft will not be comming in that fast. They will also have IFF active.

We are talking about an engagement that happens so fast you probably can't fully understand. If Iran was to launch one of their SCUD variants, we have roughly 2 minutes from acquisition to engagement. On an aircraft going at Mach 2, you have about the same amount of time.

And it should be obvious, if it is going that fast, it is a military aircraft. And the friendlies should not be comming that fast anywhere near your own assets. Because there are designated "air lanes" above an engagement space. Friendly craft know the correct cooridor to use. And if they are violating it, they had better be calling down to us, telling us why they are in restricted airspace. With IFF off.

As for calling them, there is no time. And visual verification? That thing is comming in at you balls to the wall, at 15,000 feet. The Hellfire and related missiles can shoot you from 5-25 miles. And that missle is also a Mach 1.3-2.3 missile. Before you can see it, you are dead if it is hostile. Before you can get his attention and call 3 or 4 times to verify it is not friendly, call down to the Battalion and Battery, he has already launched his missile and is going the other way.

This is no longer World War II, where Air Defense was machine guns and 40mm cannons going against 300 mph prop driven planes that can only fire machine guns or drop bombs. In most modern engagements, the pilot never actually gets "eyes on" with the target. They use radar and long range targeting like FLIR and TV cameras to verify and launch attacks.
Reply With Quote
  #250 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mushroom View Post
Remember, you have also been tracking it.

But if an aircraft is comming at you ar Mach 2, without IFF identification, you assume it is hostile. Because for one, friendly aircraft will not be comming in that fast. They will also have IFF active.

We are talking about an engagement that happens so fast you probably can't fully understand. If Iran was to launch one of their SCUD variants, we have roughly 2 minutes from acquisition to engagement. On an aircraft going at Mach 2, you have about the same amount of time.

And it should be obvious, if it is going that fast, it is a military aircraft. And the friendlies should not be comming that fast anywhere near your own assets. Because there are designated "air lanes" above an engagement space. Friendly craft know the correct cooridor to use. And if they are violating it, they had better be calling down to us, telling us why they are in restricted airspace. With IFF off.

As for calling them, there is no time. And visual verification? That thing is comming in at you balls to the wall, at 15,000 feet. The Hellfire and related missiles can shoot you from 5-25 miles. And that missle is also a Mach 1.3-2.3 missile. Before you can see it, you are dead if it is hostile. Before you can get his attention and call 3 or 4 times to verify it is not friendly, call down to the Battalion and Battery, he has already launched his missile and is going the other way.

This is no longer World War II, where Air Defense was machine guns and 40mm cannons going against 300 mph prop driven planes that can only fire machine guns or drop bombs. In most modern engagements, the pilot never actually gets "eyes on" with the target. They use radar and long range targeting like FLIR and TV cameras to verify and launch attacks.
Shhhhhhh... He's just trying to cover all the bases...

__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
  #251 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Mushroom's Avatar
Governor

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Al-Audib, Qatar
Posts: 545
Blog Entries: 1

United_States     Qatar

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
I have served my country in a way far more meaningful than the military sheep have.
Uhhh, yea... right.

Tell me, when was the last time you spent months or years away from your family, in a hellhole. And I do not mean Cleavland.

I am on my 4th deployment. In a place where the day temperature is often 120+. I have served my country for over 11 years directly.

Oh, but I have had other jobs too. Boeing, Hughes, even Disney. But I returned to the one I love best. Where one minute I can be at work doing paperwork, then the next I may be in Louisianna or Mississippi, cleaning up after a Hurricane. Or in California, helping recover from an Earthquake or putting out a wildfire.

Or in Malaysia, helping recover from a tsunami.

So please excuse me, as this "Military Sheep" kindly and respectfully suggests that you "Know Yourself", in the Biblical way.
Reply With Quote
  #252 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Mushroom's Avatar
Governor

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Al-Audib, Qatar
Posts: 545
Blog Entries: 1

United_States     Qatar

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
don't you military fools have your long extensive system of codes and passwords and secret ID's. ?
Yes, actually we do.

One of them is this nifty little box. It is a radio transponder, that only reacts when the correct code reaches it. Then and only then, it sends out another little code, identifying itself to the other unit.

It is very sophisticated, relying on complex cryptography, with a key that changes on a daily basis. And every box has it's own special code and ID.

It is called an "IFF Unit".

Reply With Quote
  #253 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mushroom View Post
Yes, actually we do.

One of them is this nifty little box. It is a radio transponder, that only reacts when the correct code reaches it. Then and only then, it sends out another little code, identifying itself to the other unit.

It is very sophisticated, relying on complex cryptography, with a key that changes on a daily basis. And every box has it's own special code and ID.

It is called an "IFF Unit".



Well played, Sir. Well played, indeed...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
  #254 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,461

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mushroom View Post
Yes, actually we do.

One of them is this nifty little box. It is a radio transponder, that only reacts when the correct code reaches it. Then and only then, it sends out another little code, identifying itself to the other unit.

It is very sophisticated, relying on complex cryptography, with a key that changes on a daily basis. And every box has it's own special code and ID.

It is called an "IFF Unit".

yes but wouldn't you want to rely on several different layers of codes and security, and not one little unit to define reality for you?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #255 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2009
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,328

   
Re: How you think we should attack IRAN?

Quote:
Originally Posted by htperr6565 View Post
yes but wouldn't you want to rely on several different layers of codes and security, and not one little unit to define reality for you?
If you had even the slightest clue about what you're talking about, you would know that other factors; many of which have already been discussed, are definitely considered.

You wouldn't know that, though...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online