You've still never answered my question - what do I do with the feds calling me about your message? I'm really worried about how much they call, and I don't know what to do.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Because you work for them. And this is only a tactic of harassment. That's the answer.

----------

Fake democracy

It looks like a system of democracy, it is only a covert totalitarian under the cover of "freedom".

Both parties work for one master: the Inside group. When people get angry with one party then the Inside Group let the other party go to perform on the stage so people thought there is a change and relaxed then.

But when the issue relates to the interest of the Inside group, whichever the party is, they would vote for the interest of the Inside Group not for the people. Iraq war is an unjust war, Demo joined GOP passed the Iraq war Authorization Bill. Now though Demo knew it's against people's will, they still released the funds too for another war - Iran war.

We saw in May, the House suddenly ended a confrontation with Bush administration, released the Iraq military fund. Bush got what he needed for Iran war. The expense for Iraq operation is about 56 billion each year. This time Bush got more than 100 billion, almost double than ordinary expense. What is extra money for? It's for Iran war.

You see, Demo not only released military fund, they also covertly approved for another war. The only person who doesn't know is the public.

Of course, they always have an excuse. This time it is: support our troops.
You can oppose Bush's policy. It is democracy. But you must support our troops. It is patriot. Anyway the troops are under Bush's command. So support our troops is actually support Bush. It is tricky.

Who played as a dummy in this game?

__________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

But, I don't work for the feds. I did work for the state government once, as a teacher, but I have not worked in any other government capacity since.

Please, help me. How do I stop them? The phone calls and emails are bad enough, but then the circling black helicopters started appearing...

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Are you implying that, with current US foreign policy, it can be pretty hard to convince the rest of the world that we are really trying to simply export our shinning beacon of democracy, whenever we deny and disparage their sovereign state's rights?

I think the PCIG should allocate more time to committee meetings and less time to micro-managing the US political economy. Maybe they can convince the party of massive deficits to take some time off next election cycle to better formulate their supply side economic theories.

What do you think of a hypothetical scenario, where the UN is given a mandate to provide for the domestic tranquility of any states experiencing anarchy (e.g. Iraq)? From this perspective, the US could simply request the UN be authorized to fulfill any obligations for ensuring the domestic tranquility of that state.

No informant will admit he works to speak of others.

8. Cho Seung Hui was under surveillance. (Virginia Tech. shooting)

Re: "Cho went to bed early by college standards, about 9p.m. He often rose early, but in recent weeks he had been rising even earlier, frequently before dawn, Aust said. Such was the case Monday.

Cho awoke before 5 a.m., then sat down to work on his computer and awakened his roommate in the process. Grewal, who shares a room in the same suite, saw Cho in the bathroom shortly after 5 a.m.

As usual, Cho did not say anything to Grewal. No good morning, no hello, Grewal said. Cho stood in the bathroom, brushing his teeth, wetting his contact lenses and applying a moisturizer.

He also took a prescription medicine, though neither Aust nor Grewal knew what the medication was for." (Mercury News "Shooter/ classmates feared he would kill", 4/18/07)

To get up early before dawn is not popular, especially for those who do not habituate to. Did Cho's suitemate follow up Cho's routine? The description was so detailed that it seems like Cho was under surveillance.

(to be continued)

487. Informants troop (6) (5/28/07)

8. Cho was under surveillance

If you used to get up at 7:am, when your family member get up before 5.a.m. would you follow up him(her)? Generally, people would go on with their sleep. Do you have habit to follow up your family member to the bathroom? Generally people don't bother others in bathroom unless there is emergency.

Re: " "Caught in the backlash", (ACLU reported on 11/13/01),

Charlotte Wu, a 20 years old student of UC Berkley, was visited by 3 policemen of camps about one month after 911 last year. It's about 30 minutes after she finished a phone call. In phone call, she instructed her friends how to play an internet game. It's a spy game. Player must put bomb at the foot of wall to break it. Policemen questioned her why she talked about spy and bomb on the phone. At last, she had to go to her friend's place with police to clarify it. Lucky enough, her friend was still playing that spy and bomb game.

Charlotte Wu never talked to policemen for all her 19 years experience. (She was 19 then) She was very scare and wonder how could police know what she said in phone call. Policemen didn't explain.

She may never know her phone is under surveillance if she hadn't talked about spy and bomb.

ACLU of Northern California :

http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aber...on/4519596.htm

(I learned this from "World Journal" of 11/14/2002 in which it said Ms. Wu still didn't know how police could know her phone call one year later. Several days later a message told me it was reported by her suite-mate. I am surprised at that for the whole year Ms. Wu hadn't got an explanation from police, now when it became a news, they said it was from an informer. Some response said it was Echelon or Carnivore. So despite of the surveillance system on communication, there maybe a surveillance net of informant? No wonder Ashcroft proposed TIPS programme of one million informants.)

There were other cases indicated informant are everywhere.

In July, 2006, news reported the Miami terror cell case. In which FBI sent an informant, disguised as Al Qaida messenger, to direct the group to attack FBI office throughout the country.

In May, 2007, news reported the extremists group plotted to attack Fort Dix. In which FBI sent an informant to offer the group the assault rifles.

Remember, FBI doesn't have a crystal ball which can tell it where there is a terror cell. There must be a surveillance net gave it the information. So before Feds could send out a directive informant to set up the case, there was an informer there already.

From above samples, we know how densely and thickly the informant are used. Each dorm of the university or about average six people there is one informer. This is a spy country.

In July 2002, former Attorney General Ashcroft announced Operation TIPS in which government will recruit one million mail carriers, utility readers..... to be informants to report suspicious event. . I at first wondered how could the Feds recruit one million people in a short period. How big is US Army? One million and something. It's almost another Pentagon to recruit one million informants. Then as I get familiar with Feds, I knew they have that informant troops already. Operation TIPS is only an attempt to turn one million of that troops from the underground to formal establishment.

Cho Seung Hui's behave in bathroom at about 5 a.m. on 4/16/07 was recorded either by a needle point camera or some people's mind. It means he was under close surveillance that particular day. Because he would play an important role in the coming tragedy - a scapegoat of the massacre. Feds didn't want their plan go wrong.

(to be continued)

__________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

You really are a nutcase if you think I work for the government.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Pssst. RedHawk! Shutup! We discontinued Operation Obfuscate last week!

__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas

You two are encouraging him/her. For the love of God, stop it .

__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them; speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

What do you think of a world class federal government? Consider current US foreign policy. A UN, empowered to provide for the domestic tranquility of any state, could have simply sent in the UN ATF to Baghdad and solved a minor problem.

From another perspective, the UN should have had sufficient authority to ensure weights and measures standards (e.g. a commercial reactor licensed for commercial purposes only).

Join peace march or criticize Bush will land you on "no-fly" list

Quote, "Professor who criticized Bush was told he was added to terrorist 'no-fly' list

Michael Roston

Published: Monday April 9, 2007


A top Constitutional scholar from Princeton who gave a televised speech that slammed President George W. Bush's executive overreach was recently told that he had been added to the Transportation Security Administration's terrorist watch list. He shared his experience this weekend at the law blog Balkinization.

(Walter F. Murphy*|* Faculty Associate)

Walter F. Murphy | Faculty Associate

Walter F. Murphy, the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Emeritus, at Princeton University, attempted to check his luggage at the curbside in Albuquerque before boarding a plane to Newark, New Jersey. Murphy was told he could not use the service. [Can you all believe this crap! What happened to freedom of speech! This garbage has got to stop and stop now! We the people cannot just sit back and say well, it's not happening to me so I'll do something when it gets worse, etc. Send/write letters of protest to officials, form groups to fight this crap! Protest/march against this from happening! ETC.....]

"I was denied a boarding pass because I was on the Terrorist Watch list," he said.

When inquiring with a clerk why he was on the list, Murphy was asked if he had participated in any peace marches.

"We ban a lot of people from flying because of that," a clerk said.

Murphy then explained that he had not marched, but had "in September, 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the Web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the Constitution."

The clerk responded, "That'll do it."

Murphy was allowed to board the plane, but was warned that his luggage would be "ransacked." On his return trip, his luggage was lost. [This is beyond total harassment, this is outright criminal!!!!]

Murphy is a decorated Marine who served in the Korean War and was a reservist for 19 years. Mark Graber, who presented the blog post, adds that there were other reasons that Murphy was an unlikely terror suspect.

"While he holds some opinions, most notably on welfare, similar to opinions held on the political left, he is a sharp critic of ROE V. WADE, and supported the Alito nomination," he wrote.

[I (IAM1) spoke with Mr. Murphy on April 11th 2007 and told him I supported him. He was very appreciative. He is a professional and an expert on/in our Constitution and we all need to support people like him who stand up for our Constitution!]

The blog post on Murphy's experience can be accessed at this link.

(Balkinization)

__________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

What do you think of a hypothetical case based on constitutional law, where injunctive relief (in the form of a 9A individual power to request it) from the public sector and to deny and disparage any actions of the executive branch of the public sector that may interfere with the free exercise of the 1A right (and power) to redress of government?

In my opinion, this type scenario illustrates the concept of the theory of nullification of the powers of the federal interstate, from an individual perspective, but that can be applied at the state level; as a form of states' rights.

The theory of nullification could be used as a basis for enforcement of the 1st, 9th and 10th Amendments in the US, at the individual and state levels.

Mind control by feeding selective news.

Quote, "Things Your Media Momma Didn't Tell You
Friday, June 15, 2007

The fact that most Americans oppose the war in Iraq, and want the president impeached, is testimony to the native intelligence and common sense of the citizens of this nation.

It sure isn't thanks to the quality of the news we're getting here in America.!
Here are some of the things you don't know if you just depend on the corporate media for your information:

Most Americans would like to see this president and vice president impeached and removed from office. Newsweek magazine published a scientific poll last October showing that 51 percent of us favor impeachment (including 29 percent of Republicans!), but the corporate media, which normally hasn't met a poll it won't publish, didn't publicize this one. And now, when the numbers supporting impeachment are surely even higher, you can't even pay a polling outfit to ask the question. No wonder most people who favor impeachment still think they're odd ducks.

There is a bill, filed in the House of Representatives on April 24 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the impeachment of Vice President Cheney. Since it was filed, it has gained six co-sponsors, including a member of the House Democratic leadership, Rep. Janice Shakowsky (D-IL). Most major media have ignored this important story completely. Most Americans also don't know that the Vermont State Senate voted overwhelmingly this spring to call on Congress to impeach the president.

The president has been declared a felon in federal court. Yet even after Federal District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled last August that President Bush and the National Security Agency were committing serial Class A felonies and were violating both the First and Fourth Amendments by spying on Americans' communications without first obtaining warrants, Bush continued ordering the NSA to continue the patently illegal program for at least half a year. In reports on the spying program, the corporate media never mention that it has been declared a felonious activity by the federal court.

Fifteen Democratic Party state organizations have passed impeachment resolutions calling on Democrats in Congress to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president and vice president. The most recent of these, the Democratic Party of Oklahoma, passed its resolution at the party's annual convention on May 19. Other Democratic Party conventions, in states from Nevada and California to Massachusetts and North Carolina, have passed similar resolutions. Most have been ignored by the corporate media even in their own states.

Bush's so-called "coalition of the willing" is not so willing and is not really much of a coalition either. When's the last time you've heard how many countries are on board with the US in the war and occupation of Iraq? The reality? Britain, the only significant contributor of combat troops besides the U.S., is pulling out, as did Italy and Spain, and many other countries, like Denmark, Lithuania and others, plan to be out of Iraq by August or at the latest December. One indication of the seriousness of situation: The Pentagon no longer lists the countries that are members of the "coalition."

The only mainstream report I've seen laying this out this collapse in international support for Bush's war was in USA Today last February.

The Homeland Security Department last year awarded Halliburton $385 million in a no-bid contract to construct prison camps designed to hold tens of thousands of unspecified prisoners in the event of domestic unrest.

Meanwhile, President Bush has signed a bill altering the insurrection act so that he can declare martial rule and order active duty troops to take charge anywhere in the domestic US in the event of "public disorder." No one in the corporate media has reported on these developments or asked the White House to explain what it's all about.

There is evidence that Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, was a patron of the Washington Madam whose client book of high-class call-girls is causing many in Washington political circles-mostly Republicans it appears, who apparently need to pay for their sex-to sweat. So far no mention of the Cheney angle in the corporate media, though they've been having fun with the broader story of a political sex scandal. No mention either of how a brave West Point cadet refused to shake Cheney's hand on stage when the vice president was handing out this year's diplomas at the Army's premiere academy.

Among the "worst of the worst" of the "evildoers" captured and held as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo were children, some of them preteens and kids who were under 15 when captured and brought to Cuba-so many in fact that the military had to set up a special facility, called Camp Iguana, just for adolescent and pre-pubescent "fighters." The corporate media have barely reported on this atrocity (the New York Times ran only one article mentioning child captives, in June 2005). The only wider coverage of this outrage came recently when the government tried to prosecute one such alleged child "terrorist"-Omar Khadr-only to have the military judge in charge toss his case out because the government had misclassified him. Khadr, we learned, was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan at the ripe age of 15, making him one of the older child captives brought to and interrogated at Guantanamo. Under international law, the U.S. was supposed to treat this and other child soldiers as victims, not as war criminals. Khadr, a Canadian by birth, instead has spent five years doing hard time in US captivity.

Well-researched reports on the rampant theft of both the 2000 and 2004 elections, and on Republican plans for theft of the 2008 election, such as Mark Crispin Miller's Fooled Again, have gone unmentioned in the corporate media. Books on the subject, like Miller's and like Greg Palast's best selling Armed Madhouse, have never been reviewed.

(Things Your Media Momma Didn't Tell You - Free Market News Network)

__________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

Psychological Operation

When Bush needed war in Mid-east, he activated 911 attack, in the name of Al Qaida. We saw the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

When Bush needs more troops for war on Iran, he did it by surge, in the name to fight Al Qaida in Iraq. This is why Al Qaida bombed Shiite shrine in Sammara and bombing Iraqi civilians in the market: to provoke a civil war in Iraq so Bush can have an excuse to surge.

The troop is ready, but he still needs an excuse to start the war. Beware of another super 911. This time it is likely a nuclear bombing, he'll take the advantage of "shock and awe" to start another war.

That's why you have Chertoff's gut feeling, double reward of Bin Laden's head, new Bin Laden's tape, London's bomb case, all are psychological operation for the coming false flag terror attack. It's that simple.

__________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

You and analyst should write a book.

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum