Thread: "The Revolution Would Like to Apologize for Shitting all Over Your Apathy!"

Originally Posted by Blue Doggy

Republicans represent the rich, the elites, big business, banking. They represent the very people who are aiding communists. They represent the people who moved to a communist state in order to take advantage of cheap communist labor.. And that is all that I need to know about the Republicans. Yet you guys have the nerve to accuse dems of being socialists, communists. The fact is, there is a love affair with communists, and the actions of the repubs proves it. If you hated communism so damn much, you would desert the party that loves them, the party that first came up with free trade. The only trouble is, the conservative mind is incapable of seeing what your own people have done. America is enriching a natural enemy, helping them by our dollars to build up their military, their blue water navy. Those communists want to surpass our military, our economy, and you guys are allowing this to happen, in order so the people that party represents can max out their wealth in communist china, by utilizing that dirt cheap commie labor, which is the perfect work force because they are NOT free. You do not have a leg to stand on, and you represent treason to this nation and her majority. What nerve you guys have. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for the treason you embrace. The arrogance from you guys is hard to bear, given what you are guilty of.

Bla Bla Bla socialism rules bla bla rich people evil bla bla government will save us bla bla republicans hate babies bal bla bla racist pig! bla bla bla Che all the way baby!!!bla bla bla......That about cover it?

Originally Posted by thanatos144

What they fail to understand is that most of us adults grew up with the Soviet union and have seen what their revolution leads to.

Then you must remember all-too-well how the actual threat was over-hyped by the usual imperialistic warmongers so they could engage in "corporate welfare" by promoting the military-industrial complex, which Eisenhower warned us all when it was becoming mainstream hysteria back in the 50s. How an idiot b-movie Hollywood actor who actually believed all that propaganda became president, and he almost started a nuclear war long after the peril had ceased to even be a real problem anymore. How the Soviet Union was already doomed to fail due to economic problems even before he took office, but he was still given credit for that failure by so many dishonest hypocrites.

Originally Posted by thanatos144

Bla Bla Bla socialism rules bla bla rich people evil bla bla government will save us bla bla republicans hate babies bal bla bla racist pig! bla bla bla Che all the way baby!!!bla bla bla......That about cover it?

Learn to say that in Mandarin. You will need it.

I thought it was common knowledge that the Republicans have more empathy with the rich than the poor. Whether that's a bad thing is debatable but I think they would get less flack from the other side if they just stopped hiding the fact (rather badly) and admitted that they do more for the rich than the poor.

Originally Posted by tsquare

Indeed...

If I had a dollar for every generation of loopy leftists sitting around awaiting the American people to rise up and throw off their chains of capitalism, I'd be someplace sunny and warm, with a cool drink and a hot woman.

Hot women are very nice ... you should try one sometime. And if you've never had one, then welcome to the revolution, comrade.

Originally Posted by thanatos144

What they fail to understand is that most of us adults grew up with the Soviet union and have seen what their revolution leads to.

If you read anything about the October Revolution, you'd understand that their revolution turned quite reactionary, despite the protests of actual socialists and communists. I know you're adverse to reading, but it really does help sometime when forming an opinion.

Originally Posted by Blue Doggy

Republicans represent the rich, the elites, big business, banking. They represent the very people who are aiding communists.

That's not really true. Republicans represent all Americans no matter what arbitrary class Dumocrats try to pigeonhole them into. Everyone from the common working folks to even the most vulerable people such as unborn American babies that Democrats are constantly fighting tooth and nail to slaughter en masse. The Republicans are vigilantly protecting them from those corrupt just plain evil piece of shit lying anti-American assholes known as the Democrats whose goal is the destruction of American wealth and prosperity in order to bring on communist revolution.

The Democrat party was hijacked by communists a long time ago. Hell, they even used the communist Red Army symbol as the main decorative theme at their 2008 convention at the Pepsi Center. There was gigantic red army stars affixed over the main entrance. Then as a backdrop for the event they used a gigantic animated video screen that showed white stars rising from the bottom of the screen that transformed into red stars by the time they got to the top of the screen and loomed over their brainwashed audience.

The OWS people also display communist symbols like the raised fist and the red army star and burn the American flag. The propaganda machine MSNBC which promotes OWS also uses the red army star as a backdrop.

Originally Posted by Blue Doggy

Republicans represent the rich, the elites, big business, banking.

Just who do you imagine Obama,Reid, and Pelosi actually represent? Hmm....which one of them isn't a millionaire? Keep falling for the Republican and Democrat "us vs them" game and you are little more than a puppet dancing on strings for those in power.

Originally Posted by Formaldehyde

How an idiot b-movie Hollywood actor who actually believed all that propaganda became president, and he almost started a nuclear war long after the peril had ceased to even be a real problem anymore.

At least he didn't go as far as to commit piracy on the high seas in provoking a nuclear war like one of the Kennedy boys did. Too bad he didn't wait for economics to have impact before pushing things right?

So a real threat is far less important than an imaginary one perceived by a senile old man who took a nap every afternoon, because he had to be so vigilant to an impending Soviet nuclear attack where he would only have a few minutes to respond?

And aren't you advocating attacking Iran for possibly developing a nuclear weapon halfway around the world, instead of having numerous ones already in place and aimed at the US only 90 miles away?

Originally Posted by Rude Boy

If you read anything about the October Revolution, you'd understand that their revolution turned quite reactionary, despite the protests of actual socialists and communists. I know you're adverse to reading, but it really does help sometime when forming an opinion.

and thus one more thread will devolve into 'how many communists can dance on the head of a pin'

Originally Posted by tsquare

Irrelevant?

Let's talk about the number of threads in which it was discussed who was of what type of communist/socialist/Marxist/Maoist/Leninist/Trotsky-ite someone is or is not, and just which one of those is the 'real' one...

Now THAT is irrelevant...

I happen to think it's important to understand political philosophy, and to separate who were charlatans, and who actually adhered to the principles of said philosophy. It's quite understandable that you like your politics quite simple, black and white with no nuance or detail. I, however, do.

Originally Posted by Formaldehyde

So a real threat is far less important than an imaginary one perceived by a senile old man who took a nap every afternoon, because he had to be so vigilant to an impending Soviet nuclear attack where he would only have a few minutes to respond?

Nations don't have a right to defend themselves? Only we do? Do you propose for one minute you'd have supported either Bush or the senile B-actor if they committed piracy by stopping traffic on the high seas in violation of international law i.e.: piracy?

And aren't you advocating attacking Iran for possibly developing a nuclear weapon halfway around the world, instead of having numerous ones already in place and aimed at the US only 90 miles away?

What gives you the idea I advocate attacking Iran for possibly developing a nuclear weapon?