Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net






Why thank you. I hadn't realized there even was a 1798 law justifying Obamacare. I'll have to look that up. As to my appeal on Health Insurance, which is about as far away from what I thought we were discussing as you can get, my appeal there has always been to economics and common sense. You may be healthy NOW but sooner or later the GREATEST possibility is that (God Forbid, but it almost certainly will happen sometime) you will get very sick. If and when that happens, and if you have been unwise or unlucky enough to be without health insurance at the time you WILL, go into an ER and proceed to cost me and the American Public tens of thousands of dollars. Millions do this annually and it is the major reason why our Health Insurance Costs exceed those of every other developed nation on Earth by a substantial margin while giving us only 17th place in overall services, (sorry, no link now, and really unimportant to the discussion, so look it up yourself if you're interested. I've seen it before with some degree of confidence) so I profess the government has an overriding public interest in making sure we all have Health Care Insurance, whether it limits our Freedom or not..
As we've pretty much agreed, NO ONE can be entirely free, so, from the freedoms offered, you pays your money, and you takes your pick. I think mine make more sense than yours but that's the main difference between American Conservatives and American Liberals










Unwise? This problem exists because of government. Rather than appeal to common sense of getting government out of it, you make the illogical argument of more government is needed. Not only that but the federal government at that! The federal government NEVER had constitutional authority to dictate health care! Never!
When I am sick I want a doctor not a man with a gun in a far off capital.
"No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles."
-- Patrick Henry












True, true and true. Republicans were founded as the liberal party. And the formal name for the politics I ascribe to is Social Democracy, in Europe I'd be a leftist moderate.
So do I. So what?
At the risk of going way off topic HOW would you get government out of it?
I'm much better looking.
Last edited by John Drake; 04-30-2012 at 10:33 AM.

















By emphasizing that character matters. A Conservative who recently retired after many years in service said that although he knew his guiding principles he admitted he often felt and sometimes gave in to the pressure of his constituents "to do something." Putting the passion of the moment aside, upon somber reflection a seasoned statesman might acknowledge that sometimes the best thing to do is let things play out - exercise the virtue of patience and restraint.
"No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles."
-- Patrick Henry






You should always have an informed opinion, so after I inform you, please feel free to express my opinion...USCitizen











Sometimes I wonder just how knee-jerk legislation really is.
For example, I don't believe for a second that no one saw the crash coming in 2008 and I believe GW's bail-out was planned well in advance.
I'm not saying people sit back for years in a dark basement and burn candles.
I simply don't think legislation is as random as it might seem.
In fact, the more damaging, the less off-the-cuff.
You should always have an informed opinion, so after I inform you, please feel free to express my opinion...USCitizen
Most of it. And most of it is in response to reacting to the unintended consequences of previous knee jerk reaction. I mention Obamacare as an example. You cite the crash, which was politically driven inaction because the narrative was to turn mortgage qualification into class-warfare, which I see that (ideology driven) being very different than psychologically drive impulse to react to problems where in the long run the reaction causes more problems than doing nothing.
Said differently, many times there are social ills - economic (unemployment), moral (unwed mothers), natural disasters (Mt St Helens explosion) - that the coercive force of government makes worse in the long run.
"No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles."
-- Patrick Henry






You should always have an informed opinion, so after I inform you, please feel free to express my opinion...USCitizen
Bookmarks