But without Fox what cable news outlet wouldn't be in the tank for Obama?
Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net






As if FOX was already lacking credibility ... they are already on the campaign trail. How can anyone take them to be even a shadow of a news organization?
'Fox And Friends' Anti-Obama Video Could Double As GOP Ad [UPDATE: Fox News Issues Statement] (VIDEO)
Hot Air's Ed Morrisey said that it didn't seem like something a news organization should be producing:
I know the initial response will be that other news organizations offer biased perspectives and hagiographies of Obama that go well beyond a single video … and that response is entirely valid. However, we usually criticize that kind of behavior with other news organizations, too. If anyone wanted to look for evidence that the overall Fox News organization intends to campaign against Obama rather than cover the campaign, this video would be difficult to refute as evidence for that claim.
The Baltimore Sun's David Zurawik denounced it, calling it reminiscent of "1930s propaganda":
As the guy who challenged the Obama administration two years when it tried to deny Fox News access to interviews and other opportunities offered to the media on the grounds that Fox was not a legitimate news operation, I have to tell you even I am shocked by how blatantly Fox is throwing off any pretense of being a journalistic entity with videos like this. Don't be fooled by Bret Baier's Boy Scout smile or all the talk about how some shows are news and some are opinion on the channel. Any news organization that puts up this kind of video is rotten to the core.
“If we open up our borders … we could suppress wages of middle class jobs” – Alan GreenspanWe need to suppress the wage levels of the skilled. We need to suppress wages in comparison to the “lesser skilled ” - Alan Greenspan
But without Fox what cable news outlet wouldn't be in the tank for Obama?
Watch MSNBC and get back to us on that "pitiful" comment.
Take a good hard look, it's coming.
Definetly one of the more opinionated animations theyve done. Still doesnt change the fact that they also report news and facts. I feel the same way about MSNBC and CNN. They all blend fact and opinion, with varying degrees. Its infotainment, and youve shown shown nothing new here.




Fox news is an absolute joke and the people who defend it wouldn't know what impartiality is if someone slapped them round the face with a wet fish with the word impartial painted onto it. Fox news is not a news channel any more than cartoon network is.
- - - Updated - - -
If fox were in the least bit balanced they would have ads like this in support of Obama as well as against but all Fox does is act as the mouthpiece for the Republicans. That's not news.






What do we expect from big corporate owned media? ADVERTISING.
I have been watching the "fair and balanced" mouthpiece of the republican party for a long time. No one can watch a days programming from FOX and not be aware this is a republican media outlet. And that means a propaganda outlet, posing as news.
That's fine, but what irks me is that they lie about it, and deny. Which makes the entire network, dirty liars.
I watched ABC news last week, the evening news, and it reminded me of the old days of news,where you did not get a feeling they were cheerleading, or attacking. Could have been just that particular program, but I saw non of the venom of Fox. Or MSNBC.
MSNBC and FOX are both propaganda outlets, and it's obvious. MSNBC just does not lie about it.
I am a rare bird, I guess, because I don't think propaganda should be so accepted, and even applauded. Just another symptom of a broken political system.
"Like every other good thing in this world, leisure and culture have to be paid for. Fortunately, however, it is not the leisured and the cultured who have to pay." Aldous Huxley.
All TV news is God-awful. I assume we can agree on that. And your point about "infotainment" is very important, because once news organizations were expected to turn a profit, their mandate was no longer to inform, but to entertain... which is why news tends to be no more sophisticated or informative than The Real Housewives of Orange County.
That's not to say every news organization is exactly the same. They have all descended into stupidity, but there is a difference between Fox and CNN on a political level, which is that while CNN may be politically biased, Fox has a political agenda. And that is a very different thing. As Chris Wallace once said, "We're the counterweight. They have a liberal agenda, and we tell the other side of the story." If you are a news organization dedicated to only telling the conservative side of the story, you are not a news organization at all. You are a political organization.
So when Fox News produces and airs its own anti-Obama attack ad, it is simply being consistent with its mission statement, which is to promote the RNC agenda.
Some would call that a distinction without a difference.Originally Posted by AdamKadMon
But let’s go with it for the sake of argument. In my prior post I remarked [only partly in jest] that without Fox there’s no cable news outlet not in the tank for Obama. Indeed, one of the reasons Fox get’s the high ratings is precisely because their bias/agenda is distinct from the rest of them.
On one end of the spectrum you have Chris Matthews all but falling to his knees in worship of the anointed one and on the other end is Sean Hannity coining the term ‘anointed one’---in reference to Obama.
Without Fox it’s a one-ended spectrum and that can’t be healthy in a democratic society. In fact, when you only get one end of the spectrum you no longer have a democratic society.
So, I really don’t get the fuss. If people are unable to recognize bias when they see it---we have bigger problems than bias in the media.
If a man were behind four months on his mortgage and was talking to you about his plans to build an addition on his home you would think him daft and delusional. But in Washington, ignoring a current crisis to discuss grand dreams is called “boldness” and “vision.”

I don't really see what the issue is.
The segment covered the deficit, the unemployment rate, the costs of gas and food, and savings which are all pretty important issues to pretty much everyone.
I guess Michael feels a "credible" news agency should focus on nothing other then Sarah Palin being a cunt, how hysterical it is for Rick Santorum's son to have died shortly after birth, and the POTUS' evolving views on gay marriage. I guess those are the only issues of importance to liberal America.






It affects no one?? That is utter bullshit. My own brother believes Fox is not biased, but simply telling the truth. And I know several men who believe the same thing. If I know several people, is this an anomaly? No, it is a common thing.
Information, factual information is essential for our form of gov't. The news is the source of that info. If the news is corrupt by ideology, it is worthless, yet very dangerous.
The old pre fox media may have had a liberal bias, but it is nothing compared to the overt mouthpiece that Fox is. They blur the line between factual news and opinion, on a regular basis. The old news media did not do that. Fox opened the door, pandora's box, for this crap. This is another destructive thing coming from the right. Wonder who's book they read to do what they have done? What dictator are the emulating?
"Like every other good thing in this world, leisure and culture have to be paid for. Fortunately, however, it is not the leisured and the cultured who have to pay." Aldous Huxley.
Bookmarks