Sorry to mention the Inconvenient Truth of what you keep saying about Rakkasan, even though discussing your words is not the same thing as "Sam bashing".

As for Mean Jean, the two of you seem to have something in common - you both denigrate veterans when it serves your purpose.

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

Bush has 31% approval rating. In my opinion those 31% are loyalists because they sure as hell don't care about our constitution.

Are you one of them? Is that why you're so touchy about the loyalist v patriot debate?

You bring it up in just about every goddamn thread I'm in. If you want to discuss it so bad Matt, stop hijacking all these threads and start one on the subject.

No, I long ago stopped worrying about what names you call me, Sam.

And as for the idea that anyone who does not fit your views does not care about the Constitution, well, that's just bullshit.

I think you know, from prior discussions, where I stand on the Constitution versus the actions of the administration. But I see you conveniently ignore that when it fits your agenda.

Why are you asking if I am a "loyalist", Sam - you've already publicly declared that I am one.

Sorry if my pointing our your veteran bashing conflicts with your "everyone who bashes veterans is bad" motif. I've brought it up in two threads - threads where you've lambasted someone else for bashing veterans.

If you are going to state that bashing veterans is bad, maybe you should stop bashing veterans as well?

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

so if we dont agree with sam we are against the constituition ....


31% are loyalists because they sure as hell don't care about our constitution.


wow so opposing points of view makes people against the constitution thats not demeaning at all.

__________________
Hardcore Conservative !

I said Conservative not necessarly Republican or Democrat. Liberals are in both of those parties.