Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

View Poll Results: Who Do You Hate More?
George W. Bush 6 16.22%
Osama Bin Laden 9 24.32%
I Hate Neither Of Them 12 32.43%
I Hate Them Both Equally 10 27.03%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by erikvv View Post
Well this might strike you as strange but terrorists really watch their enemies closely.
That doesn't strike me as strange.

Quote:
Like today a French journalist was released by islamic terrorist because the French announced plans for a withdrawal timetable from Afghanistan. And the Madrid bombs were for retaliation of their troops in Iraq.

My guess is that they were offended by something, like Bush' strong words against arafat, or his general unilateral foreign politics (also before 911) or his bombing of iraq earlier in 2001. If a less nationalistic, less religious, less militaristic president who wasnt so outspoken against Palestine would have been president it might not have happened.
Uh... okee-dokey. But how does this explain that you would not have heard of OBL without Bush "being there"?

Quote:
from wikipedia:

"They hate ... a democratically elected government. ... They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other." (President George W. Bush) Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People.

Bin Laden says (appearantly in response to the above), "the White House is hiding the Truth ... the reality is that we are striking them because of their evil and injustice in the whole of the Islamic World, especially in Iraq and Palestine and their occupation of the Land of the Two Holy Sanctuaries (Arabian Peninsula)."

What these extremist islamics want is that the west leaves the middle east alone. If they really wanted to strike freedom they would have struck western Europe or Turkey which are much easier to reach and have much bigger muslim populations to hide among.
As much as I generally revere wikipedia as a clearinghouse for accurate information, what, exactly, is your point? How does this demonstrate that you only know who OBL is because of Bush?
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f View Post
Dr. Goodtrips I just wanted to say, in a public fashion, that you are my favorite poster on here. Keep up the good work.
Why thank you, my friend - I do my best
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
That's quite a mouthful of unsupported slander...
I think he's just playin with me.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I don't. I included the parenthetical "whatever" to indicate whatever nefarious deeds that you think Bush is up to. Halliburton profits was just a guess.



I don't think that your analogy holds water. The misadventure in Iraq has killed roughly as many US soldiers as 9/11 killed people,
US soldiers weren't the only ones killed in Iraq.
Quote:
and the havoc unleashed on the US economy probably outweighs the money wasted in Iraq. A better analogy is that Osama is a serial killer who killed 100 people (with a knife or something else, and the rustiness of that knife notwithstanding) and wound up costing the state a million dollars and Bush is a bungling CEO who took 100 people with thousands of dollars in their pockets ice fishing on a lake with only a quarter inch of ice covering it. OBL's intentions were malicious, and Bush's were ostensibly benevolent, but mind numbingly stupid.
First of all, many Iraqis have died as a result of the invasion and occupation. I think it's in the tens of thousands. Bush didn't lose the money accidentally, he knew it would be lost/expended. Or are you telling me he thought the invasion would somehow be free of charge? I've seen Bush standing and talking at the same time so even he could not have been THAT stupid. Furthermore, his intentions were not benevolent. The way I see it, he saw the effects that 9/11 had on his support and figured the Iraq invasion would provide a similar temporary boost, and it did and he won. So I do think the bank robber scenario can be applied. The bank robber saw an action that would cost people their lives and money would make him rich, just like Bush saw that the Iraq war (lives and money) would get him re-elected.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
tamperpr00f's Avatar
tamperpr00f tamperpr00f is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Home on the range
Posts: 1,246

United_States    
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by erikvv View Post
So picking a neutral stance in the Israel conflict, respecting international treaties, and not bombing Iraq in 2001 is 'unreasonable'?

Supporting one side in a conflict or making a direct agressive move will initiate a counter-reaction. Nobody directly threatened you ('held a gun to your head'). Its more like: You supplied the gun to a guy who killed another guy, and now a friend of that other guy is coming back at you.

Dont victimize the US: youre in the middle of it.

(Also make sure you read my post just above yours)
See that is the difference between you and me. Someone puts a gun to my head and thats the end of the story. And might I add the end of whoever is holding said gun.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
scarywoody scarywoody is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 549

United_States     Germany

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f View Post
See that is the difference between you and me. Someone puts a gun to my head and thats the end of the story. And might I add the end of whoever is holding said gun.

Wow I'm suprised you can deal with putting your ego on the intertnet. It must cost a fortune in bandwidth fees.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
Donkey_Left's Avatar
Donkey_Left Donkey_Left is offline
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 13,160

United_States     Colombia

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
Of course, the argument could be made (and I'm likely to make it) that Bin Laden is bent on destruction and mayhem, while GWB is doing what he thinks is right, but fucking it up in a fashion befitting such an incompetent boob. This discussion might just lead us back to the "Define good and evil" thread where we were debating whether bad intentions or bad outcomes are worse.
Well, I'd probably be inclined to agree. I'm of the opinion that everything is motivated by economics. If you read some of bin Laden's actual rhetoric (and I have), it has serious economic undertones, while all the religious stuff is just frosting for the great unwashed to rot their teeth on.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
tamperpr00f's Avatar
tamperpr00f tamperpr00f is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Home on the range
Posts: 1,246

United_States    
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by scarywoody View Post
Wow I'm suprised you can deal with putting your ego on the intertnet. It must cost a fortune in bandwidth fees.
Being unwilling to compromise with people bent on evil is not ego it is righteousness.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
noahath noahath is offline
Moderator
Passionate idealist

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,386

Australia    
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
Oh, I feel that I should explain why I haven't answered the poll question. In the first place, the thread was titled "a poll for liberals", and I'm not a liberal, and, in the second place, I don't really "do" hatred.
I didn't do the poll either. Even though I'm a liberal, the poll was clearly not designed to generate any legitimate discussion other than to troll for an attack on the left. I don't play those games.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
tamperpr00f's Avatar
tamperpr00f tamperpr00f is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Home on the range
Posts: 1,246

United_States    
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by noahath View Post
I didn't do the poll either. Even though I'm a liberal, the poll was clearly not designed to generate any legitimate discussion other than to troll for an attack on the left. I don't play those games.
While I don't necessarily disagree with you about the motivation of the poll there seem to be a distressing number of people (of varying political affiliations) who seriously show more disdain for our current President than they do our enemies.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f View Post
While I don't necessarily disagree with you about the motivation of the poll there seem to be a distressing number of people (of varying political affiliations) who seriously show more disdain for our current President than they do our enemies.
How do you describe an "enemy?" Someone who is technically "against" the US or someone who does far more damage to the US?
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
tamperpr00f's Avatar
tamperpr00f tamperpr00f is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Home on the range
Posts: 1,246

United_States    
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
How do you describe an "enemy?" Someone who is technically "against" the US or someone who does far more damage to the US?
Enemy - any entity that seeks to do harm to "me".
Me - used here to mean myself, my family, my friends, my country etc.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f View Post
Enemy - any entity that seeks to do harm to "me".
Me - used here to mean myself, my family, my friends, my country etc.
Then I guess:

Friend - any entity that does to harm to me, although indirectly.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
tamperpr00f's Avatar
tamperpr00f tamperpr00f is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Home on the range
Posts: 1,246

United_States    
Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Then I guess:

Friend - any entity that does to harm to me, although indirectly.
Friend - any entity that desires "my" betterment. Typically shows support by contributing to "my" causes.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: A Poll For Liberals...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamperpr00f View Post
Friend - any entity that desires "my" betterment. Typically shows support by contributing to "my" causes.
What do you call someone that does much more harm to you than your "enemy?"
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 AM.