Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,645

United_States    
Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_inKarlate View Post
Why should corporations be allowed to help elect politicians? Perhaps for the same reason that they're allowed to be taxed?

As others have said, the problem isn't corporate money, or even money, it's corruption. Corruption follows power, so the real solution is to remove (or more accurately, severely reduce) the power of the politicians that are elected. The shortest path (that I know of) to that true solution is to elect Libertarians.
You only say that cause Libertarians have no power, and thus have not been corrupted. No doubt theyd follow the same pattern.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
BlackAsCoal's Avatar
BlackAsCoal BlackAsCoal is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,299

United_States    
Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Up until about 1886, corporate donations to politicians was against the law. That was a good idea.

America has morphed into a plutocracy where the richest 1% not only control 95% of the wealthy, they also control 95% of the political agenda and 99% of the people.

We stand by and watch the travesty like deer caught in the headlights at our own peril.

Last edited by BlackAsCoal; 06-18-2007 at 02:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
BlackAsCoal's Avatar
BlackAsCoal BlackAsCoal is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,299

United_States    
Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_inKarlate View Post
Why should corporations be allowed to help elect politicians? Perhaps for the same reason that they're allowed to be taxed?

As others have said, the problem isn't corporate money, or even money, it's corruption. Corruption follows power, so the real solution is to remove (or more accurately, severely reduce) the power of the politicians that are elected. The shortest path (that I know of) to that true solution is to elect Libertarians.
Libertarians would make the problem even worse. They believe in turning the entire country over to "the market" without any restrictions whatsoever.

Ron Paul doesn't believe in any limits on campaign contributions so corporation could freely buy any politician they choose.

There are so many variations of small "l" and large "L" libertarians I'm not sure they know who they are. But the one commonality is they believe that individuals are more important than their country.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
metalted's Avatar
metalted metalted is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: HollyWood Cali.
Posts: 4,659

United_States     Israel

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Who selects the candidates will be allowed on the debates?
pram jockey does.
__________________
Quote:
"Prepare for war, wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near."---Joel 3:9


www.myspace.com/crusade7
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,172

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalted View Post
pram jockey does.
Dear God, man. Have you gone completely sideways? That'd be a horrible solution!
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
metalted's Avatar
metalted metalted is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: HollyWood Cali.
Posts: 4,659

United_States     Israel

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Dear God, man. Have you gone completely sideways? That'd be a horrible solution!
__________________
Quote:
"Prepare for war, wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near."---Joel 3:9


www.myspace.com/crusade7
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
metalted's Avatar
metalted metalted is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: HollyWood Cali.
Posts: 4,659

United_States     Israel

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

i dunno i always thought everyone should be given equal airtime. granted there would be alot of canidates to debate.. maybe we can skim them down over time and have people vote with cell phones who to continue debating. just like american idol.!
__________________
Quote:
"Prepare for war, wake up the mighty men, let all the men of war draw near."---Joel 3:9


www.myspace.com/crusade7
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,172

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Hmm.

I think that the spirit behind what you're saying is good, and I'm not sure that we disagree.

Imagine a country where the people who are in government are there not becuase they crave power, but because they actually want to serve.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackAsCoal View Post
Up until about 1886, corporate donations to politicians was against the law. That was a good idea.

America has morphed into a plutocracy where the richest 1% not only control 95% of the wealthy, they also control 95% of the political agenda and 99% of the people.

We stand by and watch the travesty like deer caught in the headlights at our own peril.
Like I said, the problem is corrupt politicians, not the donations. It's like banning guns instead of jailing criminals.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
BlackAsCoal's Avatar
BlackAsCoal BlackAsCoal is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,299

United_States    
Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Like I said, the problem is corrupt politicians, not the donations. It's like banning guns instead of jailing criminals.
I disagree on both points.

Money MAKES politicians corrupt because you can't compete for office without it. Once they take it, they are beholden to those who gave it to them. What is required is a system that frees politicians of the need to beg the Godfather for money.

On the question of jailing criminals .. the US already encarcerates more of its population than any nation on earth. At what point does intelligence and reason step in to find another way?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,762

United_States     New_York

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Or you can just stop electing corrupt politicians. I'd say a step in the right direction would be to elect a reasonably honest libertarian, or libertarians, and go from there. A government too small to give subsidies to corporations wouldn't be able to do it no matter how corrupt it becomes at any point. I suggest getting rid of Presidents who support wars of aggression, huge military, any welfare (including corporate welfare), and just leave the basics, like a defensive army, federal police force, government official salaries, judicial salaries and upkeep, etc...
There is no such thing a non-corrupt national or state level politician. Anyone who is willing to do what it takes to be elected to those offices has already "sold out".
Any government which provides for the defense of the country will already have enough money to attract the vultures. So there is no such thing a national government "too small to give subsidies".
__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackAsCoal View Post
I disagree on both points.

Money MAKES politicians corrupt because you can't compete for office without it.
If you mean because it's impossible to advertise yourself without money, then I would say it is the fault of shallow American voters who vote based on advertisements that they saw and which guy has the better suit. Again, you are looking in the wrong place for the problem.
Quote:
Once they take it, they are beholden to those who gave it to them.
So don't vote for those whom you think will have loyalties located specifically with big corporations. Again, a problem with the voters who elect those people.
Quote:
What is required is a system that frees politicians of the need to beg the Godfather for money.
You mean a system where many American voters aren't completely retarded pieces of shit who vote based solely on party associations and "for the lesser evil?"
Quote:
On the question of jailing criminals .. the US already encarcerates more of its population than any nation on earth. At what point does intelligence and reason step in to find another way?
At the point where you decide to take a broad, heavy-handed and unjust approach to try and quell a symptom of the bigger problem: stupid voters.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,733

United_States     Russian

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219 View Post
There is no such thing a non-corrupt national or state level politician. Anyone who is willing to do what it takes to be elected to those offices has already "sold out".
Then that is because voters are interested in electing said sellouts. I guess you'll just have to vote on candidates based on merit rather than party affiliations and "lesser evil" mentality.
Quote:

Any government which provides for the defense of the country will already have enough money to attract the vultures. So there is no such thing a national government "too small to give subsidies".
Maybe they won't stop right away, but corruptibility will be reduced due to the simple fact that there is less to corrupt. The rest of the subsidies will need to be done away with by electing good politicians, rather than sellouts.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,762

United_States     New_York

Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Then that is because voters are interested in electing said sellouts. I guess you'll just have to vote on candidates based on merit rather than party affiliations and "lesser evil" mentality.
It is because the huge cost of getting elected precludes the candidacy of any but the corrupt. When all the candidates with the wherewithal to mount an effective campaign are bought and paid for, voters are left with little to choose between them. Over time voters come to believe they cannot affect the process and lose interest which exacerbates the problem.
Quote:
Maybe they won't stop right away, but corruptibility will be reduced due to the simple fact that there is less to corrupt. The rest of the subsidies will need to be done away with by electing good politicians, rather than sellouts.
Maybe they won't stop it ever since even the most pie in the sky scenario still leaves government with vast quantities of money.
__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2007
Si modo's Avatar
Si modo Si modo is offline
In a Garden of Eden
Buckeye by birth; Boilermaker by choice

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,216
Blog Entries: 1

United_States    
Re: Should companies be allowed to give money to campaigns?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pramjockey View Post
Proof?

Oh, and don't forget how much money is going to Republicans so we can compare.
Lawyers/Law Firms:
Long-Term Contribution Trends
Opensecrets.org--Money in politics data (Lots of donor info by industry - I highly recommend it.)
__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them; speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition

Last edited by Si modo; 08-19-2007 at 12:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online