Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219
It is because the huge cost of getting elected precludes the candidacy of any but the corrupt.
|
Are you reading what I'm writing? I already told you:
this is because voters keep voting for the guy with the best suits and the most advertisements!
I don't believe there is a law on the books that says you have to have a few million dollars to get elected.
Quote:
When all the candidates with the wherewithal to mount an effective campaign are bought and paid for, voters are left with little to choose between them.
|
Voters can vote for ANYONE! I believe the requirements are a certain age and natural-born citizenship. Nowhere does it say you have to have good advertising campaigns and lots of money!
That is a symptom of a retarded voting population! It's in the hands of the voters.
Quote:
|
Over time voters come to believe they cannot affect the process and lose interest which exacerbates the problem.
|
Actually, that IS the problem: voters who think there are only two possible candidates and that voting for someone who isn't one of the two retards is "throwing your vote away."
Quote:
|
Maybe they won't stop it ever since even the most pie in the sky scenario still leaves government with vast quantities of money.
|
And you get rid of the rest, or most of the rest, by electing semi-honest officials.