Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
||||
|
Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
YouTube - Hillary & Edwards' Secret to 86 Other Dems in Pres. Debates
Busted Mother@*%^&#($s!. Hopefully this can allow more "2nd tier" candidates a better shot. I'm tired of these so called front-runners getting all the attention. From what I've seen the top three Dem and Rep contenders aren't even the best people running in their parties.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004 |
|
||||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
Quote:
It's time the better candidates get our votes, instead of the bigger candidates. There are "2nd" tier candidates in both parties, which could earn my vote, if both parties would just put the best candidate forward, instead of the usual dog and pony show. Gawd, it's so frustrating, we're probably going to be sold down the river again, with nothing but a bunch of wind-bags to choose from. ![]()
__________________
"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." "An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens." -Thomas Jefferson |
|
|||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
Quote:
The $$ want their candidates- the ones they control- to be the only choices on ther menu. Remember Tammany Hall's philosophy? |
|
||||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
Quote:
you saw leadership there? My god, I saw self serving greed and if a rep makes the same statements I would say same.... maybe what’s to be seen is 2 candidates who don't want any limelight shared...one is struggling and the other has a viable candidate on her heels....so just shut the rest out of the process....and as far as the party 'keeping it eyes on the ball' I find that a remarkable statement.......maybe clinton should have faded in 92, being deemed inconsequential after the first primary? Or his run up to such.....eh? That’s why we have primaries(?), maybe you’d like to skip that part because that’s what it appears you advocate.... So, lets just come up with another version of the old Dem fairness doctrine...only in this version here, if someone doesn’t have say 30 mill, they are out...inconsequential...”not serious”..nice to see Hill revert to form in the public arena......wow....so I don’t expect to see or hear any rant if the reps wind up with more money than the dems.... etc..it all goes hand in hand.... apparently you 'like the fringe' guys, butnot enough to give them their shot.....that was a real look into your thought process' thx. it appears you live up to your avatar....screw the law, lets pack the supreme court.
__________________
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile.... |
|
||||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
yes agreed.
__________________
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile.... |
|
||||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
Quote:
From what I've seen the candidates who most want to reform our corrupt government are the ones who get the "no chance in hell" stigma. I'm not saying goober is an authoritarian, I'm just saying he'd do everything in his power to support an authoritarian government ![]()
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004 |
|
|||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
You know, if you really want one of the vanity candidates to win, then vote for them in the primaries; this really isn't rocket science. Whether anyone likes it or not, primary victors represent the collective manifestation of the beliefs of millions of voters on who can actually win the election. Since the people who come out and vote in primaries are traditionally the hardcore members of their respective bases, it stands to reason that they'd vote for one of the second tier candidates if they thought they had a hope in hell of actually winning. The American political center of gravity is decidedly centrist, however much some folks might wish otherwise.
Last edited by Strider; 07-14-2007 at 05:14 PM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
wow - politicians being political....what a shock.
I will once again vote - then shower - and not waste my vote on someone who can't prevent a moron from being in the oval for 8 years. Not sure if I'll vote dem or repub - but much as I hate it, they have the game, the refs, and the stadium.
__________________
And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, Jan. 29, 2007 |
|
||||
|
Re: Dems Conjuring Up Villanous Plots
Like them or hate them, these " fringe " candidates are the only means to hold the " annointed ones " feet to the fire.
The more uncomfortable and inconvenient, the better in my book. There sure as Hell is no reason whatsoever to exclude anyone before the first round of primaries/caucuses. With this, I say Fuck Clinton ( repeated sentiment ) and now Fuck Edwards as well! Barack is looking stronger and stronger.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks | |||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|