Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Marcel View Post
You don't make any sense.

Under Bill Clinton, America increased the number of cops in America. Drastically.

I've never heard anyone ever say that if we build more roads, it will make traffic worse. Complete crap. Who'se ever said that?

Getting rid of Homeland Security should be done immediately. Could never have imagined that under a conservative president that they would expand the federal gov't to such a ridiculous degree that there is now a whole entire part of the gov't that is in business to help co-ordinate the CIA, the FBI, and FEMA and other huge federal agencies. Billions of additional dollars of taxpayers money being wasted on a venture that still isn't up and running and leaves people to wonder what it is they actually do.

Homeland Security before 9/11 would not have prevented it from happening. Good police and investigative work would have. It's that simple.

You can't call yourself a conservative any longer and be for huge gov't overreaching and expansion that is unnecessary and wasteful.

So you can say whatever you want Paleo, you're obviously a big gov't neo-liberal fascist who thinks that America ought to control every other nation instead of working with them. That's not a conservative ideal, and what this new generation of conservatives is doing is actually along the liberal-fascist lines.

Don't the neo-cons even know that they aren't new or conservative in any way?
Notice how Libertarians and Democrats have similar counter-intuitive talking points. And notice how they defend each other:

Democrats, "If you build more roads, then more cars will just clog up the roads, divert infrastructure funds to build more light rail instead."

Democrats and Libertarians, "Homeland security makes America less safe from terrorism."
Reply With Quote
  #212 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
So what you're saying is we need to dump our beliefs? Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of getting into office?
Your beliefs are wrong, I have no problem with dumping Libertarians from the Republican Party.
Reply With Quote
  #213 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,675

United_States     Russian

Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleoRepublican View Post
Your beliefs are wrong, I have no problem with dumping Libertarians from the Republican Party.
It's right to hold a gun to employers' heads in order to force them to hire the most incompetent person for the job?
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #214 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is online now
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,749

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
It's right to hold a gun to employers' heads in order to force them to hire the most incompetent person for the job?
Every so often, amongst the rest of his posts which make no sense, Slon raises the art of the nonsensical post to its' apex...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #215 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,801

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleoRepublican View Post
I have no problem with dumping Libertarians from the Republican Party.
Actually, that makes sense all around. GWB and big-government social conservatives have made the current platform of the GOP an odd hybrid between liberal fiscal/foreign policy and conservative social policy. Some realignment may be in order - the values of the Christian "right" are more conducive to the Democrat platform anyway.

There doesn't seem to be much ideological difference between Republicans and Democrats anymore. It'll be interesting to see what sort of ideological realignment occurs. "Neoconservatives" could probably find themselves pretty comfortable with the far left if they could see fit not to squabble over inane issues like abortion and gay marriage.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #216 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,801

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleoRepublican View Post
Libertarians and Democrats are both counter-intuitive through and through, "Well if we just get rid of the cops, it will make us safer."
I've seen hardcore, self-described Libertarians espouse this point of view (it might make people with enough money to hire private security forces safer, but not the public at large). I think you'd be hard pressed to find a democrat say this - Democrats generally seem to support as many people receiving government paychecks as possible, and unions to boot.

The Libertarian and Democrat philosophy on government scope and size is diametrically opposed. As a non-libertarian Republican (I'm assuming, given what I've read of your posts here - correct me if I'm wrong), you're a lot more ideologically aligned with the Democrats than the libertarians are.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #217 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,675

United_States     Russian

Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Every so often, amongst the rest of his posts which make no sense, Slon raises the art of the nonsensical post to its' apex...
What is nonsensical?
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #218 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
hairballxavier's Avatar
hairballxavier hairballxavier is offline
Vice President
Covert leader of the ... conspiracy

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: The Crossroads ...
Posts: 6,929

    Ohio

Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I've seen hardcore, self-described Libertarians espouse this point of view (it might make people with enough money to hire private security forces safer, but not the public at large). I think you'd be hard pressed to find a democrat say this - Democrats generally seem to support as many people receiving government paychecks as possible, and unions to boot.

The Libertarian and Democrat philosophy on government scope and size is diametrically opposed. As a non-libertarian Republican (I'm assuming, given what I've read of your posts here - correct me if I'm wrong), you're a lot more ideologically aligned with the Democrats than the libertarians are.
Are you implying that he's a neo-con?
__________________
... ..................
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Reply With Quote
  #219 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,675

United_States     Russian

Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I've seen hardcore, self-described Libertarians espouse this point of view (it might make people with enough money to hire private security forces safer, but not the public at large). I think you'd be hard pressed to find a democrat say this - Democrats generally seem to support as many people receiving government paychecks as possible, and unions to boot.

The Libertarian and Democrat philosophy on government scope and size is diametrically opposed. As a non-libertarian Republican (I'm assuming, given what I've read of your posts here - correct me if I'm wrong), you're a lot more ideologically aligned with the Democrats than the libertarians are.
Thing is, cops are not a replacement for private security. Cops don't have to protect you, legally. Traditionally and practically, their job is to enforce government-supporting laws and victimless crime legislation (such as speeding). In essence, it is to help the government and give you a hard time, not protect you. In other words, YOU are personally responsible for your protection (which can involve things like carrying a gun or personally paying for a guard), while police are legally responsible for busting you for bullshit offenses, giving you a hard time in general, and investigating your murder in the most incompetent manner possible hours/days/months/years after it happens.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #220 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
It's right to hold a gun to employers' heads in order to force them to hire the most incompetent person for the job?
There you go again, accusing Americans of being incompetent because Americans earn more then 50 cents an hour.
Reply With Quote
  #221 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
Actually, that makes sense all around. GWB and big-government social conservatives have made the current platform of the GOP an odd hybrid between liberal fiscal/foreign policy and conservative social policy. Some realignment may be in order - the values of the Christian "right" are more conducive to the Democrat platform anyway.

There doesn't seem to be much ideological difference between Republicans and Democrats anymore. It'll be interesting to see what sort of ideological realignment occurs. "Neoconservatives" could probably find themselves pretty comfortable with the far left if they could see fit not to squabble over inane issues like abortion and gay marriage.
You are absolutely wrong. Everytime Republicans try to cut spending, Democats obstruct. You anarcho-capitalist Libertarian free-traitors are also wrong on your sub-standard goals of destroying the economy of the United States by importing cheap labor and exporting American labor.
Reply With Quote
  #222 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I've seen hardcore, self-described Libertarians espouse this point of view (it might make people with enough money to hire private security forces safer, but not the public at large). I think you'd be hard pressed to find a democrat say this - Democrats generally seem to support as many people receiving government paychecks as possible, and unions to boot.

The Libertarian and Democrat philosophy on government scope and size is diametrically opposed. As a non-libertarian Republican (I'm assuming, given what I've read of your posts here - correct me if I'm wrong), you're a lot more ideologically aligned with the Democrats than the libertarians are.

Wrong. Libertarians and Democrats split in the 1970's. It was the Democratic Party which was the party of free-trade, it is the Republican party which was the party of protectionism.
Reply With Quote
  #223 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Thing is, cops are not a replacement for private security. Cops don't have to protect you, legally. Traditionally and practically, their job is to enforce government-supporting laws and victimless crime legislation (such as speeding). In essence, it is to help the government and give you a hard time, not protect you. In other words, YOU are personally responsible for your protection (which can involve things like carrying a gun or personally paying for a guard), while police are legally responsible for busting you for bullshit offenses, giving you a hard time in general, and investigating your murder in the most incompetent manner possible hours/days/months/years after it happens.
^^^Like I said, Democrats and Libertarians think alike, and argue alike, and are just as radical.^^^
Reply With Quote
  #224 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,675

United_States     Russian

Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleoRepublican View Post
There you go again, accusing Americans of being incompetent because Americans earn more then 50 cents an hour.
First of all, I accused SOME Americans of being incompetent. Second, answer the question and stop dodging.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #225 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2007
PaleoRepublican PaleoRepublican is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 122

   
Re: What is wrong with Ron Paul?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
First of all, I accused SOME Americans of being incompetent. Second, answer the question and stop dodging.
Wrong, you call American employees incompetent, American business inefficient, simply because Americans earn more then 50 cents an hour.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online