Originally Posted by Brett Golden

Dr Paul has already accepted Don Black's $500 donation, folks. And he ain't grovelling before the jewish Anti-Defamation League who's demanding he give it back.

So get over it.

Originally Posted by Steve

You don't seem to understand. We really don't care who gives him money, or who demands he give it back. He'll never be elected President...

Originally Posted by Meridious

"The gambling public"

/chuckle

You mean the wackjobs and the 911 Tr00thers...oh wait....they are one and the same....

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

What cha think of dem "apples" ?? Gotcha. . . he he

Originally Posted by Meridious

He "ain't" gonna be president, either...which is the important thing, of course.

I TOLD YOU! I TOLD YOU ALL!

Ron Paul has 3 types of voters, 911 Tr00thers, K0npisracy wackos, and CRAZIES...I've said it 6 times at least.

This new crazy, racist, forum-nutball is helping prove it.

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

Ron Paul Odds Have Been Slashed to 6 to 1: Now Favored Over Romney
Public pushes Ron Paul odds down even further this week

Forget those political polls. Throughout time (at least the last decade), oddsmakers have had an uncanny knack for predicting political races. It's not so much that they have a crystal ball, rather the lines adjust based on public action. When it comes to political betting, the public action is presumed to represent votes. The theory being that someone who is likely to vote on Mitt Romney probably won't bet on Ron Paul winning.

The gambling public seems to believe that 2008 Presidential candidate Ron Paul stands a very good chance of winning, so much so that this past week odds on Dr. Paul have been slashed further from 8 to 1 down to 6 to 1, with the potential payout of $600 for every $100 bet. (see betting odds at Sportsbook.com).

This gives Ron Paul shorter odds than Mitt Romney. He's only slightly trailing behind John McCain (5 to 1 odds) and Rudy Giuliani (5 to 1 odds). Fred Thompson is the favorite among Republicans with odds of 4 to 1.

What cha think of dem "apples" ?? Gotcha. . . he he

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

Well now N.S., that's mighty cavalier of you to apologize for another man's words, but in Martin Luther's case, doing so makes you contradictory. You cannot admire a man for his words, while apologizing for his words at the same time, and expect to be taken seriously. As you well know, Martin Luther hated jews, and urged Christians to drive them out of their country because jews hated Christ, as they still do, and because jew money changers were robbing Christian people.

Now you'll say you admire some of Martin Luther's words, but not all. Right ??

Do you also apologize for some of God's words too ?? Such as for example, St John 8:44 wherein God, thru his son, told the jews: "Ye are of your father, the devil."

How about after Pontius Pilot told the jews "I can find no fault with this man". And the jews cried: "Crucify him, crucify him, and let his blood be upon us and our children."

And, 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 says: "...for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they did from THE JEWS, WHO KILLED BOTH THE LORD JESUS and the prophets, and drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men."

Do you apologize for all that, too ??? And do you apologize for me quoting God, for you ??

Originally Posted by Steve

I don't particularly care what the odds makers say. Ron Paul won't win, regardless of how much money he raises.

If money was the deciding factor, President Perot would've served two terms...

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

You really do have an honest and open mind, mkultra. I admire AND respect that.

Btw, there's an excellent discussion forum where lots of white folks go to discuss things that interest them at: Stormfront - Discussion Board for Activists. You can listen to what awakened white people are saying and doing these days. They've even got white talk radio, and lots and lots of white pride videos, and music too. It'll blow your young mind.

(I'm outa here. Gotta get off this computer before my wife hits me with something. See yaw'll tomorrow)

Originally Posted by drgoodtrips

Actually, to be honest, I'd vote for Ron Paul over any candidate in the field right now...

And, I don't believe that 911 was a konspiracy, and I don't think that I'm a racist, and I don't really think that I'm crazy.

Perhaps I'm a statistical outlier

Originally Posted by Meridious

Well, there IS always ONE.

Originally Posted by mkultra

no candidate should be attacked for who supports them

Originally Posted by Steve

It doesn't matter who he takes money from, he'll never be President...