the corporate media is pro war and silences every other opinon--that much has been documented

I'm a po fellow, partofme. I couldn't pay you if I lose. But if you're willing to take my cyber space bet, let's make it a cool million, OK ??

Unfortunately it is often the case that they are. I seem to remember on some other forum that a similar issue came up with a Democrat. If Ron Paul’s interest is getting elected he should probably decline the money, rather then risk having the label stick. Then again perhaps the publicity might work to his benefit.

Usually candidates like him, Gravel, and Kucinich don't worry so much about this sort of thing because they really have nothing to lose. That does free them up to say whatever pops into their heads which at least keeps them entertaining although not viable.

yea its hard to figure out what strategy would work best

well maybe these fringe candidates are running to do something the mainstream candidates arent allowed to do---like tell the truth more?

I don't mind these guys adding different points of view to the debates but none of them have really gone anywhere. Ron Paul probably has gotten further than the other two simply because he has several people that are willing to hijack online polls and such and spam his message. No serious voter respects that sort of behavior.

You're a rare fellow, mkultra. 99% of white men are scared to death when they even hear another white man say "WHITE MAN" in public, much less visit a white man's website. They cringe in fear of being attacked by the nearest mob of black folks, who'll hear the words, or learn they made the website visit. It's the damn truth.

well we all need to do something to take our electoral process back out of the hands of the anti-american corporations

Watching the third party debates on C-Span is even better. You always have a libertarian, a green, a socialist, and a very far right religious candidate from the reform party or constitution party. They are great.

I see no shame in anyone taking pride in their heritage--why is it only bad when white people do it?

yea they always make all the debates much more entertaining and relevant--they say things youd hear real americans say

I was saying they are entertaining because of the crazy conspiracy theory stuff they say. O well.

But Dr Paul's a patriot, mkultra. He believes honor and principle outweighs political "strategy". And that's why so many patriotic Americans support him.

He's not like the bought and paid for whores in Washington, who'd sell their mother's into slavery for an endoresment by the NAACP and/or the American Jewish Congress or La Raza (which means: The Race), the largest Hispanic "civil rights" group in the country.

I'll tell you why, mkkultra. It's because those who control our government and those who control the national media, hate us because we are white, and they forbid us from having White leaders and White organizations that'll work for the interests of our white people.

And it's been this way for way over half a century.

The media and government demonizes and hates every single White civil rights leader and group in our country, and they have for the past 50 years.

Have you ever heard anything good about any white civil rights group or leader on TV, or by any politician, in your entire life ?? See what I mean ?? The government and media hates them all, and therefore they also hate all white people. Simple logic.