Originally Posted by partofme

Usually candidates like him, Gravel, and Kucinich don't worry so much about this sort of thing because they really have nothing to lose. That does free them up to say whatever pops into their heads which at least keeps them entertaining although not viable.

Originally Posted by lostinacause

The "if" was a big if. It is clear that his main object is something different.

I agree with you that they make politics interesting and entertaining. It is refreshing to see what politicians stand for.

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

But Dr Paul's a patriot, mkultra. He believes honor and principle outweighs political "strategy". And that's why so many patriotic Americans support him.

He's not like the bought and paid for whores in Washington, who'd sell their mother's into slavery for an endoresment by the NAACP and/or the American Jewish Congress or La Raza (which means: The Race), the largest Hispanic "civil rights" group in the country.

Originally Posted by lostinacause

The "if" was a big if. It is clear that his main object is something different.

I agree with you that they make politics interesting and entertaining. It is refreshing to see what politicians stand for.

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

I'll tell you why, mkkultra. It's because those who control our government and those who control the national media, hate us because we are white, and they forbid us from having White leaders and White organizations that'll work for the interests of our white people.

And it's been this way for way over half a century.

The media and government demonizes and hates every single White civil rights leader and group in our country, and they have for the past 50 years.

Have you ever heard anything good about any white civil rights group or leader on TV, or by any politician, in your entire life ?? See what I mean ?? The government and media hates them all, and therefore they also hate all white people. Simple logic.

Originally Posted by mkultra

I never saw things in these terms before but its pretty hard to refute if you look at the facts objectively--it seems that white people have less speech rights and are increasingly demonized

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

You wanna hear "hate messages"? Google your signature: "Martin Luther jews". Your hero, Martin Luther, was one of the biggest racist and anti-semites in all of recorded history. You're a bit of a contradiction, wouldn't you say ??

Originally Posted by partofme

What if? I didn't use the word if in that post. ???

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

In that case, lostinacause, you might consider checking out Ron Paul. Lots of his videos there, too. Just click on Ron Paul 2008 — Hope for America. He'll blow your mind with his honesty, and patroitism.

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

You really do have an honest and open mind, mkultra. I admire AND respect that.

Btw, there's an excellent discussion forum where lots of white folks go to discuss things that interest them at: Stormfront - Discussion Board for Activists. You can listen to what awakened white people are saying and doing these days. They've even got white talk radio, and lots and lots of white pride videos, and music too. It'll blow your young mind.

(I'm outa here. Gotta get off this computer before my wife hits me with something. See yaw'll tomorrow)

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

But if Paul returns the money, he'll be violating his own stated principles of freedom for all, special rights for none, thus greatly disappoint many of his local supporters, who strongly believe in the US Constitution.

To deny financial contributions from any person, in effect, disinfranchises them, and prevents their equal participation in the election process.

I mean, if it's proper to refuse money from one group, then it should also be proper to refuse money from any group. Where will it end ??

Originally Posted by mkultra

so how is it Ron Pauls fault that these people want to contribute to him? Im not taking a position on whether he should keep or return the money but I dont like the whole guilt by association mentality that people are somehow to blame if some controversial group supports them

Originally Posted by mkultra

I agree he should give the money back or it appears like hes endorsing them

Originally Posted by Brett Golden

Sloan, I think maybe you didn't digest all that I said. You're right of course, that refusing the money won't ban anyone from voting, but it will prevent them from fully participating in the election process equally. How can I support Ron Paul equally to say John Blow whose money is accepted by Rudy Giuliani, if Ron Paul doesn't accept my money ??

Originally Posted by Si modo

Post No. 2 [Emphasis mine]

Post No. 6Flip-flop much?