Kucinich to endorse Paul - Page 4 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

liberty1776 · #46 (**permalink**) 01-28-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Traveler

Yeah that's what i meant, like the liar rule which is set by the forum moderators.

I know, I have admitted I was wrong, what else do I need to do?

Quote:

So you, as Paul does too, believe that AZ has the right to allow and therefore wed a man and his goat?

Well, I am hesitant to speak about states having "rights." Although I do it, I try not to. So, it is not that AZ has a right to do this, but, under the Constitution, it is not forbidden.

CYDdharta · #47 (**permalink**) 01-28-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by liberty1776

Oh geez. Please, no. I couldn't take this. This would be worse than when Badnarik (LP candidate) decided to march in the gay pride parade.

No need to stress who Badnarik is/was. If it was up to USPOL members, he would have won the last election.

liberty1776 · #48 (**permalink**) 01-28-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by CYDdharta

No need to stress who Badnarik is/was. If it was up to USPOL members, he would have won the last election.

Really? Or is this just some joke? I actualy started posting here after the 2004 LP convnetion. It was Badnarik's empassioned speeches that got me onto this site.

Traveler · #49 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by liberty1776

Well, I am hesitant to speak about states having "rights." Although I do it, I try not to. So, it is not that AZ has a right to do this, but, under the Constitution, it is not forbidden.

Well basically where i'm going with this is, do you think that we can just dump Paul of in AZ and marry him off and that way stop him from returning to TX by saying he has to fullfill his obligations to his goat or donkey or whatever?

Steve · #50 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by liberty1776

Now this is funny. I am being lectured by STEVE for not having class. Steve, who has a difficult time finishing a train of thought with out using the F-Word. Steve, who has some vile quote in his signature. Steve, who has a very difficult time finishing a post with out personally attacking someone. Take your stupid self-righteous garbage elsewhere Steve.

Oh, by the way, since you are completly unaware of why I I called Oreo a liar, let me explain. He launched into some tirade against Ron Paul. He said that he watched all of the last debate and that Paul answered only two questions. I proved him wrong, and he has been silent ever since.

But this is funny, Steve. YOU lecture me on class, then less then 2 inches below that line, you have some vile quote about doing rude things to a goat. How dare you lecuture on class. Why don't you just admit it, Steve? You have no clue about politics. You are on this forum because you think it shows that you are politically active and aware. You have no idea what you think or why you think it. So, you roam around these boards and act as some sort of self-appointed moderator. Well, go on and report me. I think I can dig up about 40 quotes of you personally attacking someone.

At least I'm able to comprehend the rules.

'Tis clear that presents a challenge to you.

Godspeed...

Steve · #51 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by liberty1776

And, if I am going to be lectured, I prefer it not come from someone like Steve, who probably breaks some forum rule on a great number of his posts.

Well, now that I know you don't like it, expect it.

Because, frankly, I don't give a FUCK what you "prefer"...

Quote:

As for the signature, it is not that I mind the signature. Low class people are going to behave like low class people. I just find it humorous that he dares to assult my "class," and then sign off with something that is even more classless than what I said, which is, by the way, true.

It is difficult to "assault" something which is non-existent.

The quote is not mine; it was made by someone else. If it offends you, ask me to remove it, and I just might. But that quote violates no rules...

Steve · #52 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by liberty1776

Everyone will be happy to know, I have changed the post. Now we are all free to judge for ourselves.

If you spit on someone, and then wipe it off, didn't you still spit on them?

Donkey_Left · #53 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve

Well, now that I know you don't like it, expect it.

Because, frankly, I don't give a FUCK what you "prefer"...

It is difficult to "assault" something which is non-existent.

The quote is not mine; it was made by someone else. If it offends you, ask me to remove it, and I just might. But that quote violates no rules...

What's the difference between "fuck" and "FUCK "?

Steve · #54 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donkey_Left

What's the difference between "fuck" and "FUCK "?

Emphasis, my good man, emphasis...

liberty1776 · #55 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Traveler

Well basically where i'm going with this is, do you think that we can just dump Paul of in AZ and marry him off and that way stop him from returning to TX by saying he has to fullfill his obligations to his goat or donkey or whatever?

Wow! I'm slow on the uptake! As I look back at this string of posts I see what you were hinting at. Geez, I really missed that! I mean, it was waaaaaaaay over my head.

Anyway, haha, funny joke.

liberty1776 · #56 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve

At least I'm able to comprehend the rules.

'Tis clear that presents a challenge to you.

Godspeed...

Yep, I agree. But, as you will see, I changed my post.

liberty1776 · #57 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve

If you spit on someone, and then wipe it off, didn't you still spit on them?

Of course, His Highness, the Self-Appointed Moral Authority of USPOL, seems not to care that I changed the post. You know, most people wouldn't still be whining about something like this, especially someone who wasn't even involved.

Oh, by the way, I have not recieve a message from a mod., you know the guys who are actually in charge here, instead of just pretending. So, perhaps you should just drop this whol thing.

Slon · #58 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve

At least I'm able to comprehend the rules.

'Tis clear that presents a challenge to you.

Godspeed...

What's sad is that comprehending the rules (or perhaps only this rule in particular) is the only thing you have going for you, and you are proud of it.

CYDdharta · #59 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by liberty1776

Really? Or is this just some joke? I actualy started posting here after the 2004 LP convnetion. It was Badnarik's empassioned speeches that got me onto this site.

Nope, no joke. I think he got something like 40% of the USPOL vote.

That's something good to keep in mind when when judging an issue by it's reaction here; this site doesn't exactly mirror the general public's view.

liberty1776 · #60 (**permalink**) 01-29-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by CYDdharta

Nope, no joke. I think he got something like 40% of the USPOL vote.

That's something good to keep in mind when when judging an issue by it's reaction here; this site doesn't exactly mirror the general public's view.

That's riiiiight, I forgot about that.

Bookmarks
Digg	del.icio.us	StumbleUpon	Google

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode