Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2008
liberty1776 liberty1776 is offline
Secretary of Defense
A libertarian first, a Libertarian second

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Liberty
Posts: 2,518

   
Kucinich to endorse Paul

My "sources" tell me that Kucinich will endorse Paul.

Will this help, hurt, or not matter?
__________________
"Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question."
-Thomas Jefferson in his first inauguration address
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2008
Bunz's Avatar
Bunz Bunz is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Independant Idealist

 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Unalaska
Posts: 1,176

Alaska    
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

One nut without a shot at winning, endorses another nut without a shot at winning.

Id call it a push.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2008
Slon Slon is online now
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,951

United_States     Russian

Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunz View Post
One nut without a shot at winning, endorses another nut without a shot at winning.

Id call it a push.
Why are they "nuts?" Because Paul happens to differentiate from the retarded liberal and stupidly belligerent neocon positions?
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2008
Bunz's Avatar
Bunz Bunz is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Independant Idealist

 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Unalaska
Posts: 1,176

Alaska    
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Why are they "nuts?" Because Paul happens to differentiate from the retarded liberal and stupidly belligerent neocon positions?
Hey Pal,
It was a joke, simply playing on the pre-existing portrayal of both.
Now your notion of Paul is a matter of perception. Personally, Im all for streamlining the Federal Government, but going to the levels he has described go past anything I could support.

Either way, both are fringe or niche candidates and Paul has made a decent run for himself and shaken things up a bit. He still doesnt have a shot in hell at winning, and the Kuninich endorsement wont help him, actually it may hurt him.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
Donkey_Left's Avatar
Donkey_Left Donkey_Left is online now
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 12,623

United_States     Colombia

Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

I would say a bit load of "not matter."

Assuming it's true. Last I heard he was endorsing no one.
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."
Matthew 5:9
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
liberty1776 liberty1776 is offline
Secretary of Defense
A libertarian first, a Libertarian second

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Liberty
Posts: 2,518

   
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
I would say a bit load of "not matter."

Assuming it's true. Last I heard he was endorsing no one.
I have only heard that he was endorsing no democrat. But, my sources may be wrong; I guess we'll have to wait and see. If he does endorse Paul, this should add some support from the dedicated Kucinich crowd.
__________________
"Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question."
-Thomas Jefferson in his first inauguration address
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
partofme's Avatar
partofme partofme is offline
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Murray Kentucky
Posts: 14,080

Earth     United_States

Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

I just do not get it. When it comes to fiscal issues and size of government they are polar opposites. They do seem to agree on Iraq and social issues but that's about it.

Anyway, I do not think it matters. Kucinich did even worse than Paul is doing afterall.
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12,734

   
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

I can just hear Ron Paul now:

"Dennis Kucinich is going to endorse me? Holy fuck."

If I were runnng for President, I don't think I'd want the endorsement of Kucinich...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
Fidei Defensor's Avatar
Fidei Defensor Fidei Defensor is offline
Secretary of Defense
Advocatus Diaboli

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: in partibus infidelium
Posts: 2,740

United_States     Vatican

Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by liberty1776 View Post
My "sources" tell me that Kucinich will endorse Paul.

Will this help, hurt, or not matter?
Sure. Two more votes for Ron Paul.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
Brett Golden Brett Golden is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 1,022

   
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunz View Post
Hey Pal,
It was a joke, simply playing on the pre-existing portrayal of both.
Now your notion of Paul is a matter of perception. Personally, Im all for streamlining the Federal Government, but going to the levels he has described go past anything I could support.

Either way, both are fringe or niche candidates and Paul has made a decent run for himself and shaken things up a bit. He still doesnt have a shot in hell at winning, and the Kuninich endorsement wont help him, actually it may hurt him.
Yeah, but what if Paul had been, and was now, given equal coverage by the main stream media ?? Would you still say "he doesn't have a shot in hell of winning" ??

Frankly, if he had been, I believe he'd now be the front-runner.

The jewsmedia only allows kosher, politically correct candidates to get elected president. The jews decide and almost all jews dispise Ron Paul.

For confirmation that jews control the MSM, just google "who rules America" and "jews run Hollywood so what". And to: Professor Kevin MacDonald, CSULB, Department of Psychology (MacDonald is a CA university professor and an expert on the subject of jews)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
Brett Golden Brett Golden is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 1,022

   
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I just do not get it.
I know. I know. So spend some time at The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD and you will.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
Brett Golden Brett Golden is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 1,022

   
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunz View Post
Hey Pal,
It was a joke, simply playing on the pre-existing portrayal of both.
Now your notion of Paul is a matter of perception. Personally, Im all for streamlining the Federal Government, but going to the levels he has described go past anything I could support.
Well then, since you don't want to streamline the federal government at the Ron Paul level, and since we're in debt $48 trillion dollars (That's $161,287,000.00 for every American man, woman, and child), who do you expect to pay for it all ?? Our great-great-great grandchildren ??

We're broke, man. Get it ??

Actually, Ron Paul's proposals are extremely modest in view of the freakin debt.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
partofme's Avatar
partofme partofme is offline
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Murray Kentucky
Posts: 14,080

Earth     United_States

Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brett Golden View Post
I know. I know. So spend some time at The Official Website of Representative David Duke, PhD and you will.
And what does he have to do with Kucinich exactly?
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Non-wussy liberal

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 12,906

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
And what does he have to do with Kucinich exactly?
They're both complete lunatics?
__________________
So many cowards.

You know who you are.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
liberty1776 liberty1776 is offline
Secretary of Defense
A libertarian first, a Libertarian second

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Liberty
Posts: 2,518

   
Re: Kucinich to endorse Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I just do not get it. When it comes to fiscal issues and size of government they are polar opposites. They do seem to agree on Iraq and social issues but that's about it.

Anyway, I do not think it matters. Kucinich did even worse than Paul is doing afterall.
I know, if it is true, it is very odd, isn't it?
__________________
"Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question."
-Thomas Jefferson in his first inauguration address
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online