Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
__________________
I think at this point there needs to be a focus on an immediate increase in spending and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat . . . I believe later on there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of the money." -- Barney Frank, October 20, 2008 |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view. So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount. Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated. The Road to Serfdom FA Hayek (interpretation) Mortgage Backed Security survivor |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Never mind that at least 80% entrepreneurial businesses fail.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon Staun ma groon al nae be afraid Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
hey and how many folks actually graduate and work in their fiield? 60% ?
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view. So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount. Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated. The Road to Serfdom FA Hayek (interpretation) Mortgage Backed Security survivor |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
60% > 20%
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon Staun ma groon al nae be afraid Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears |
|
|||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
The biggest failures are those that are so afraid of failure that they never try anything. In America you have a choice- You can choose to be an employee, take little or no risk, and earn a commensurate (lower) income. OR you can become an entrepreneur, employ people, serve your community, and become wealthy . Yeah, you might fail. So what? You try again. And again and again and again if necessary. Personally, I'd never be a wage slave. I could lose every penny I've earned tomorrow and within a few years I'd make it all back and more. That is what entrepreneurs do, they create wealth. They don't teach that in college.
__________________
I think at this point there needs to be a focus on an immediate increase in spending and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat . . . I believe later on there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of the money." -- Barney Frank, October 20, 2008 |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
Managing finances is a major part of our lives and yet there are so many young people out there who have no clue how to balance a checkbook, properly build credit, or even fill out tax forms. We just assume that parents will teach their kids, but a lot of times it doesn't happen. Heck, my parents never taught me a thing about finances, I had to learn it all the hard way. While I may have lucked out, there are a lot of people out there who are not so fortunate. |
|
|||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
It's amazing though. This ideology seems to substitute for "free market" when it's not. It's actually a really limited market where people only sell things and no one makes things or manufactures things or installs things. All of which are really important market forces, but ones that you undervalue and underestimate. It's sad and it's why the economy is where it is. Yes YOU made a success as a business owner. And congratulations, but everyone owning a business is not the model for the economy. At all. And you should be able to be comfortable (not rich) for being a contributor to the economic cycle and "just" a wage earner. It's how all our parents did it.
__________________
Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he’s president he’ll take on, and I quote, 'the old boys’ network in Washington.' I’m not making this up. This is somebody been in Congress for 26 years, who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign. And now he tells us that he’s the one who’s gonna take on the old boys' network,” he said. “In the McCain campaign that’s called a staff meeting!- Obama, 9/17/2008 |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
__________________
President Josiah Bartlet: Sweden has a 100% literacy rate. 100%! How do they do that? Leo McGarry: Maybe they don't and they can't add. |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
This is true. I think there is an overwhelming cockiness stemming from the Democrats. I'd even go so far as to say that many Democrats feel they can't lose the election. I think this is a terrible mentality.
__________________
"The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised.” - George Will |
|
||||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
I wonder if part of it is that McCain has been around. He's done this a few times. Yeah, he's the front-runner for the first time, but he's not anything new. He's just another tired old establishment guy running for the Republicans. There's not a whole lot to be excited/hyped up about.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon Staun ma groon al nae be afraid Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears |
|
|||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
Let's also examine another statement you've made ; Quote:
Only a communist expects a guarantee - the are guaranteed a lifetime of mediocrity.Your entire post only bolsters my argument for business training - If we trained young people in the basics of entrepreneurship we'd have far less failures, far more successes and far more people creating wealth.
__________________
I think at this point there needs to be a focus on an immediate increase in spending and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat . . . I believe later on there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of the money." -- Barney Frank, October 20, 2008 Last edited by Alex; 02-29-2008 at 04:42 PM. |
|
|||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
![]() You list a bunch of business ventures but I'm going to focus on Quote:
Farm size and ownership ranged from individual family farms with one indentured servant/slave to ginormous plantations. However, the founding fathers were the largest farm owners, with huge expanses of land and hundreds of laborers/slaves. In both examples however, farm owners were in a dependent relationship with their workers. The founding fathers, as the owners of larger land were even more reliant on their laborers. Without workers to plant, tend and eventually harvest their huge land ownerships, founding fathers like George Washington would have acres and acres of wasted land or crops. No profit. No economic independence that allows for people to sever ties with the mother country. If there's no domestic wealth, we don't break free from England. Period. So when we think about the "founding fathers" there is no revolutoin without what would call "menial labor." Now I think there are a million reasons why today is different than the way it was in the 17 and 18th centuries. But if we're talking about the founding principles of the American economic structure and political system, there's nothing without talking about thousands-millions of people who worked in agricultural plantations. The last thing I'll say about this. If you look at the percentage of the population of colonial America, business owners made up the vast minority of the population. Most everyone else is a laborer. This isn't a new trend by the way. Through the middle of the 20th century, most (white) Americans had access to wage labor and economic comort. he thing that bothers me (and trying not to make this personal) but you seem to think that the only way people can live their dreams is if their life is this high stakes gamble, living life on the blackjack table of business entrepeneurship. That's a new cultural phenomenon and it doesn't erase the actual history of the American economies dependent relationship on American labor.
__________________
Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he’s president he’ll take on, and I quote, 'the old boys’ network in Washington.' I’m not making this up. This is somebody been in Congress for 26 years, who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign. And now he tells us that he’s the one who’s gonna take on the old boys' network,” he said. “In the McCain campaign that’s called a staff meeting!- Obama, 9/17/2008 |
|
|||
|
Re: Obama v. McCain: No Labels
Quote:
They come from people with vision, determination and goals. I'll tell you one thing - I never took on reckless risks, I was always betting on a sure thing - myself. I was raised with good values. I learned discipline in the military. I attended some college - majored in business. Then I became a journeyman in my field. Only then, after working for another succesful person did I go and start a business. There was never a doubt that I was going to be successful. Too many people are living lives of "quiet desperation" in some cubicle, because they are afraid. If they were taught basic business skills they would not have this irrational fear. At any rate, I agree that we need lots of laborers. That is why we shouldn't waste time sending some people to colleges. Sending a person of lower "book" intelligence to college doesn't do anything to help them, it only lowers the bell curve. Those people should be taught vocational skills. They often have high intelligence in other areas like mechanics, Art or music etc..There is no shame in hard manual labor. No shame at all. Anyway, I am not suggesting that everyone become and entrepreneur. I am suggesting we need more emphasis on financial literacy and basic entrepreneurship.
__________________
I think at this point there needs to be a focus on an immediate increase in spending and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second seat . . . I believe later on there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of very rich people out there whom we can tax at a point down the road and recover some of the money." -- Barney Frank, October 20, 2008 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|