Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||
|
Re: Ferraro Offended By Comparison to Pastor Wright
Quote:
I really do not see any difference between Pastor Wright and Ferraro's comments. |
|
||||
|
Re: Ferraro Offended By Comparison to Pastor Wright
Look, we all saw this coming.....the inoculation article we pointed out 6-7 weeks ago from the NY times etc........Ferraro , here to for a darling of the dems, speaks up and makes some valid points, perhaps clumsily but none the less valid, and bam. Obama has become the third rail, touch him and die.
The larger problem is, that having to a large extent, inured the populace regards their “journalistic balance”, when an important story does come down the pike, only few listen, as they have seen and heard this all before- Cons bad, dems not so bad ( or ignored), libs or close too, not really opined upon. I thought the media could sink no lower than the run up to the last election, the ammo dumps, the bogus letter etc.....this is an entirely different dimension. And on the3 subject of Ferraro and eating their own, when a lib falls in the forest does no one hear? David Mamet recently changed sides so to speak...you won’t see that anywhere but the village voice {David Mamet: Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal'}? Nope. ( I posted his humorous road to Damascus moment below). village voice > news > David Mamet: Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal' by David Mamet oh and hudson, pastor wright, made comments that don't even come into the usual political by play. Please. Do we need to spell them out again? Ferraro=bad Wright= not quite so bad with extenuating circumstances- as believing so, would ipso facto call into question the character and judgment of the medias anointed one.
__________________
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me Shall be my brother; be he ne'er so vile.... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks | |||
Digg
|
del.icio.us
|
StumbleUpon
|
Google
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|