Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,152

United_States    
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
First you wrote: This is essentially an appeal to not use labels. You are upset that people like me are calling Obama a liberal, and you want us to stop, ostensibly, for our own good.


Then after I briefly outlined my political views you respond.
SO apparently labels are only OK to use when applied by you? But calling Obama, a liberal democrat, a liberal democrat(gasp) is divisive? You must suffer from political schizophrenia.
It was an appeal explain and justify the labels you threw out (not to forbid their use). I admittedly indulged the argument and labeled some things myself in the resulting discussion. If you'd like me to justify or explain any of the labels I've cast, just let me know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
As for you question - I did like Ron Paul on domestic issues, but he is too far out in left field with regards to foreign policy. We've allowed ourselves to get entangled in a lot of thorny situations in the world that will require delicate actions rather than the hasty withdrawal that Paul suggests. So I am left with John McCain. McCain is far from perfect, he is simply the lesser of two evils.
That's good enough for me.

My approach is that I think Obama is what's best for our country in our current state. We need to be smarter about how we wage the war on terrorism and he's the one that actually seems to match my perspective on this.

Obama doesn't match me on the all the issues though. I think, like all other presidents, much of his platform is campaign filler and he won't actually get around to implementing the peripheral issues in full. But I do see that he does seem to listen, discuss, weigh, and compromise in his approach to all issues. His administration might actually pass some productive legislation. To me, he seems the most rational and balanced of all the remaining candidates.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,152

United_States    
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post

Here's one more for your list....
4)- a man who severely lacks judgment and is easily misled by demagogues.
Your number 4 is #2 plus the being misled part. I think that one is just another fear (like #1) that has no demonstratable basis.

In essence, that perspective amounts to doubt. And I would say it's not reasonable doubt.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
wagner81 wagner81 is offline
Concerned Citizen

 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 37

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Soul View Post
YOU said IN this country.....dont blame me because YOU worded YOUR question wrong...

BTW, you been fighting in the war? Or are you just sitting at home reading some article written by someone else who hasn't been there?

Those who have been fighting in it know better. We have seen it first hand and can say for sure you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

So Wagner, since you aren't serving in the military and like most liberals hate the military guts, why you so worried about us? You and your type use us in uniform as a tool to attack this the war and President. Your use for us after that is limited to calling us names....a freedom that I provide you with. Maybe it time for the sorry ass libs start fighting for your own rights. We who protect this country for those who are to damn chicken, cowardly or just to damn lazy, we might just sit the next one out. Let the libs pick up a weapon.....lol
First off you provided me with no freedom. That war was fought long ago. I don't talk down on who for the war dispite what you think. You didn't decide to go to war and you didn't want to go. The only reason you inlisted was for the money but oops now there is a war you never thought would happen. Don't come at me because you take my statements the wrong way.

What do you know better than me because you fight the war? You know my point better than I do. You see it first hand. We are not welcome. You cannot despute that. Bombings everyday against US troops kind of makes it obvious. Remember you say you fight for me and all that nonsence you speak. You fight for the government and what they want. Don't blame me because you didn't get the easy money you thought the army was.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is online now
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 12,131

United_States    
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
Well, I was just getting a little smarmy and sarcastic.. sorry for that.

I think the thing about Obama's pastor is that he's just a citizen..... yes, he has a long-term close relationship with Obama, but Obama hasn't demonstrated that he believes in any of the whacked out views that Wright expressed in the video clips.

One can characterize Obama's relationship with his pastor as:

1)- Something to fear... ie. Obama secretly embraces the wacko ideals and might impugn the government and our country (or maybe just "Whitey") from within.
2)- A political miscalculation that questions his ability to obfuscate things from the American public.
3)- An honest relationship that Obama never intended to deny or run away from just for the sake of political expediency.


I, personally am not afraid of any of those characterizations as I don't see the first as realistic, and the second 2 I actually view as assets to character and honesty.

I go with 2 and 3, I said so several pages ago. In one sense I give him props for not disowning him, but then that’s a calculated risk he is willing to take it appears. Fine I never said he was stupid, so I assume he has decided to take a stand. Maybe he really feels put upon and this is all just dreck. That’s cool too. He has made his case we'll see where it takes him.

But the afore mentioned being said, this top me at elast, speaks to a lack of judgment.....old saying first you gotta make money then you can become a pillar and do good things. So, First you gotta get elected, then you can do good things.

Your post got me to thinking on another plane. So I’ll say straight up, if he had said;

“hey, I have known this man for 20 years. When I was a fresh kid Illinois state nominee, I needed him, we became went on to become deep friends, he was there for me whenever I needed him and I aint throwing him under the bus, I love this guy, and though he’s off the wall, I cannot just drop my feelings for him.”


I would have quit this topic the minute he said it. That I can respect despite the obvious differences I have with Wrights message and whatever guerilla tendencies Obama may hold of such. He would not have gotten my vote because as alex said, I am diametrically opposed to his platform, but I would have stf up. But he was only uhm, somewhat honest, his meanderings trying to draw some tenuous link between wrights views and his grandmothers on race etc...made me think he was trying, not to well to slide one by me.

To put this in another context, I find Obama judgment deeply flawed. One of my biggest issues with Clinton was he was “stupid”. No, not dumb, he was intelligent, no doubt about it, and a guy I am sure I’d enjoy playing cards with or having a beer or 2. BUT when it comes to being the C in C, give me the smart guy, the clever guy, the guy who knows when its time to cut cards with the devil, or fold’em instead of holding them. He didn’t have that. And niether does it appear, Obama.
__________________
Obama-e fungis nati homines....
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
solletica's Avatar
solletica solletica is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,087

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oreo View Post
The character of a President is very important to me.
Well, if character were the dominant factor, then I say Jeremiah Wright for US Pres!.

One definitive measure of a person's character is the extent to which he/she can publicly espouse an extremely unpopular view which he/she genuninely believes is accurate. Dunno 'bout you, but shouting "God damn America!" to a large congregation has got to be the a shining example of that.

Time to get real--when Wright said that, he wasn't being racist, or hateful toward all Americans.

Clearly, Wright is not racist since he's invited White, Black, and Asian members to his church.

What Wright meant to say in those explosive sermons was not that America needs to die, but that the blatant hypocrisy evident in the discrepancy between the ideals of the Constitution and Free Enterprise and the reality of uncompensated forced relocation, slavery and segregation,

coupled with the US govt's ongoing habit of invading sovereign countries and sponsoring terrorism in the "name of democracy" is something that needs to be damned to hell. The USA is the world's biggest hypocrite when it comes to democracy--hands down--all educated folk know that.

(What other nation could claim that terrorists are the enemy of democracy, then claim that the democratically elected Palestinian govt. are terrorists?)

Obama, being an educated man--also knows that, and clearly knew what Wright meant in those speeches. Consequently, he correctly denounced the literal meaning of Wright's statement in his "A More Perfect Union" speech.
__________________
Life only becomes meaningful at its extremes

-- S
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
Alex Alex is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles Ca
Posts: 7,138

United_States    
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
I go with 2 and 3, I said so several pages ago. In one sense I give him props for not disowning him, but then that’s a calculated risk he is willing to take it appears. Fine I never said he was stupid, so I assume he has decided to take a stand. Maybe he really feels put upon and this is all just dreck. That’s cool too. He has made his case we'll see where it takes him.

But the afore mentioned being said, this top me at elast, speaks to a lack of judgment.....old saying first you gotta make money then you can become a pillar and do good things. So, First you gotta get elected, then you can do good things.

Your post got me to thinking on another plane. So I’ll say straight up, if he had said;

“hey, I have known this man for 20 years. When I was a fresh kid Illinois state nominee, I needed him, we became went on to become deep friends, he was there for me whenever I needed him and I aint throwing him under the bus, I love this guy, and though he’s off the wall, I cannot just drop my feelings for him.”


I would have quit this topic the minute he said it. That I can respect despite the obvious differences I have with Wrights message and whatever guerilla tendencies Obama may hold of such. He would not have gotten my vote because as alex said, I am diametrically opposed to his platform, but I would have stf up. But he was only uhm, somewhat honest, his meanderings trying to draw some tenuous link between wrights views and his grandmothers on race etc...made me think he was trying, not to well to slide one by me.

To put this in another context, I find Obama judgment deeply flawed. One of my biggest issues with Clinton was he was “stupid”. No, not dumb, he was intelligent, no doubt about it, and a guy I am sure I’d enjoy playing cards with or having a beer or 2. BUT when it comes to being the C in C, give me the smart guy, the clever guy, the guy who knows when its time to cut cards with the devil, or fold’em instead of holding them. He didn’t have that. And niether does it appear, Obama.
I think the point is that Obama is untried, untested, unvetted, unqualified- all of the things Hillary was saying. I actually agree with Hillary!! OMG!!!

Plenty of people are excited about Obama, and he has the MSM fully behind him. I still do not think that will be enough to overcome the damage.
__________________
"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to
change it." -- Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
Frank Frank is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: North of Hell, South of heaven.
Posts: 8,287

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
The amount of race baiting on Obama, IMO, out there that I've seen has been horrendous.

What I am about to say below is not intended to put any words in your mouth. They are my own. But, I hope they provide food for thought.

For example, he's now a black nationalist due to Wright.
He is a perceived black nationalist because he belongs to a black nationalist institution in addition to accepting the institutions leader as a moral guide. If I belonged to "Aryan Nations" and accepted Mr. Butler as my spiritual advisor I can guarantee you that the average American would say that I am a "Christian Identity" adherent.
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
Lost Soul's Avatar
Lost Soul Lost Soul is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,470

United_States     South_Carolina

Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank View Post
He is a perceived black nationalist because he belongs to a black nationalist institution in addition to accepting the institutions leader as a moral guide. If I belonged to "Aryan Nations" and accepted Mr. Butler as my spiritual advisor I can guarantee you that the average American would say that I am a "Christian Identity" adherent.

Damn I don't believe it, but I have to agree with Frank on this one.....

Wright is no different than the people over at Aryan Nation....both preach distrust and hate based on race.
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
Oreo Oreo is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,243

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
So because of a couple snippets over a 20 year period--longer in Wright's case--this is the conclusion. I'm just trying to get an exchange over why. I am glad you don't see yourself as racist. I don't believe you are in the way most use the term (bigot), but there are subtle things we all see or miss by our experiences that lead to bias. I've even caught them in me too. It's generally fallacious for anyone, myself included, to claim they are absolutely free of biases, noticed or unnoticed.

Explain to me why, then, are you not equally bashing and applying the same strict policy towards the large number of evangelicals who say such highly controversial things, including blaming Americans' behaviours as bringing on 9.11, Katrina, etc, as God's wrathful response, attacking gays, liberals and all sorts of Americans and blaming them for American tragedies through heaven's wrath, etc:

YouTube - The Religious Reaction to the 9/11 Attacks

YouTube - John Hagee says God sent Katrina

McCain and/or other GOPers have long expressly courted the very people or kinds of people in these videos. You'll be running out of people to vote for, or even neighbours, if such a view is applied to everyone equally as Obama.

I'm not anti-homosexual for example. I don't believe it should be outlawed and punished. Churches may differ on their views, but the Catholic one certainly condemns it. Yet, by going to the Mass (I was raised in the Quaker and Catholic churches), I don't believe all Catholics are strongly anti-homosexual or even any kind of anti-homosexual on a personal level. Opinions will range across the map on it. I know plenty of Baptists. I'd be hard pressed to assume most agree with leaders like those in the video who find homosexuals to be abominations and that they are actually a reason God made 9.11 happen to the US.

The fact, I believe, is that people attend churches and do alot of discriminating about the things they hear. Had Obama endorsed those controversial comments of Wright, that would be a much different story. I couldn't vote for a person who endorsed them. He's also repudiated Farrakhan's endorsement when called to do so, and that's even better than watching McCain seek and then reaffirm, over objections in the public, the endorsements of anti-Catholic bigot Hagee and other firebrands. But, McCain when, in courting the religious right, to state his own mind that he does not agree with many controversial things they have said too. I accept that. John McCain, like Obama, are allowed to speak their own minds on matter of faith as well as social policy. Nobody speaks for another by a proxy. Everyone speaks for themselves. That is the kind of fairness I am speaking about.

I can only speak from my own personal experience. Again, during my 50+ years I have been to many churches.

Politics is not a topic, when I am in church. Primarily because, the churches I attend are multi-cultural, (black, white, asian, etc.) including the poor, middle & upper class people. For the Pastor to get political with his personal opinions, would only offend our congregation. It would bring divisiveness, to a congregation that is very content with one another, at least, while they are in church.

I am responsible for choosing the churches I have attended during my lifetime. I don't go there to get a political opinion from the Pastor. I get those on my own.

I was just fine with Barack Obama's rejection of Luis Faragon. Understandably, he does not personally know this man, & stated that he did not share his views. This I believed, & still do.

However, when his 20 year Pastor Wright came out on video. A man that Barack Obama, tried at first to claim as a big-loud mouthed uncle. Yet as stated repeatedly was the inspiration of his book. Obviously, this is a man that Barack Obama respects & admires.

Obama, like myself has choices in the churches we choose to attend. Barack Obama made his choice. He went to this church for 20 years, & had a very close relationship with Pastor Wright. This in itself, is more than enough to question the judgement of Barack Obama.
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2008
Frank Frank is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: North of Hell, South of heaven.
Posts: 8,287

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Soul View Post
Damn I don't believe it, but I have to agree with Frank on this one.....

Wright is no different than the people over at Aryan Nation....both preach distrust and hate based on race.
But lets be clear on this; my concerns about Obama do not translate into an endorsement for that Zionist madman McCain; I would support Ralph Nader myself.
Reply With Quote
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008
Oreo Oreo is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,243

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorpMediaSux View Post
There is NOTHING that can help Obama more than people buying his books, he is open, honest and incredibly thoughtful. We know that our last two preidents used at least marijuana, and in the later case, cocaine in their youth. Would they ever admit to such in a book? Never. Obama however is unashamed of the mistakes he's made in the past. Americans who were foolish in youth and matured and found Christ and then changed their life will really respond. I guess the minority of Americans who have lived perfect lives would be turned off by his books.
All the books Obama has written, still does not excuse him for currently being a member of a racist church.

If he would have left this church, I would have nothing to say. But he didn't. He had choices & he made a very bad one to stay in this church. Let alone be a 20 year member of it, & financially support it too. Which brings the issue of Obama's judgement & character to the forefront.

Here was a man that was sailing into the White House. No obstacles to confront him, except Hillary Clinton, who is behind.

Barack Obama had rock star status, until we all got to hear Pastor Wright. Now, it's critical for the democrats to figure out between Hillary & Obama who is electable in the general election. Who can face John McCain, not only on issues, but character & judgement to win the White House.

Most of the states Obama has won, are typically red states. The southern states, considered the bible belt of this country, are critical to win. This we have witnessed over the last 2 election cycles.

Pastor Wright has incensed Americans from these parts of the country. It's in the polls. Right now he is still ahead of Hillary regarding a strickly democrat poll, but today in a general election he would lose to McCain. He has lost independents, especially. Independents make up 60% of the electorate, stating they are less likely to vote for him. Closet republicans, hmm. Will they still support him?

The million dollar question is: Are these voters going to remember Pastor Wright in November? If they do, Obama will lose the election.

Last edited by Oreo; 03-25-2008 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
mudwhistle mudwhistle is online now
Secretary of State
Not A Poser

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 3,516
Blog Entries: 15

United_States     Montana

Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex View Post
I think the point is that Obama is untried, untested, unvetted, unqualified- all of the things Hillary was saying. I actually agree with Hillary!! OMG!!!

Plenty of people are excited about Obama, and he has the MSM fully behind him. I still do not think that will be enough to overcome the damage.
Why isn't it wrong for the MSM to back a candidate?

This is a very important question.

We rely on the MSM for our news and information. Don't you think it is wrong, perhaps criminal, for them to back any single candidate? By supporting one side or one candidate aren't they using censorship and propaganda to conduct voter suppression? If they're gonna do that shouldn't they lose their right to be called fair and unbiased. Shouldn't they have to wear the label they deserve as the official voice of the DNC? Shouldn't we take the debates away from CNN, ABC, or MSNBC and put it in the hands of someone who isn't stumping for one particular candidate or one particular party?

For that matter if they support only one party or one candidate can't they be sued for false advertising when they claim in their ads they are being unbiased and accurate?

Doesn't anybody who is the beneficiary of this one-sided support from the MSM feel this arrangement thwarts Democracy in this country?

What's the difference between what the MSM is doing and talk-radio? Which one is being more honest?
__________________


"These two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis,"

"The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies,

the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."
- Rep. Barney Frank (D)

Last edited by mudwhistle; 03-26-2008 at 04:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,090

United_States     United

Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorpMediaSux View Post
I didnt say that Obama didnt lose ground. He did, but it hasnt hurt him and, most importantly the tide has already begun to turn back towads his favor. Rememer, we're choosing a president and most Americans are not like Oreo, they are not making all of their decisions on Obama based on Rev. Wright. It wouldve been impossible not to have any scandal.
The tide has turned towards him again among Democrats.

His appeal to moderate conservatives has vanished. He may win with the support of the left alone, but it will be very difficult.

Remember that the media has stopped showing those speeches by Wright. They are carefully protecting Obama in a cocoon, and praising him for every move he makes and every word he says. I don't enjoy watching the media make fools of themselves over a candidate.

The hypocrisy regarding this issue in the media is more than usually absurd. Imagine the scenario; a leading Republican candidate has been listening to white supremacist sermons for twenty years from a "pastor/mentor/advisor" who makes paranoid and hate-filled statements at the top of his lungs and denounces the United Sates. Yet the candidate dedicates his book to him. He takes a line from a "sermon" and uses it as his book title. He puts him on his campaign team. He refuses to separate from him.

What would happen to this Republican candidate? His campaign would end. You know it and I know it.

But the media is so infatuated with Obama that even this is disregarded. The left will put up with absolutely anything when they are obsesses with a candidate - anything.
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008
TSGracchus TSGracchus is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 2,242

   
Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Alex:

To call Bush a "moderate" because he has increased federal spending and entitlements is, I believe, to misunderstand the essence of what conservatism is about. Conservatism is not necessarily about shrinking government nor about increasing it. It is about protecting privilege and the opportunity to become wealthy and enjoy the fruits of that wealth. Liberalism, in contrast, is about expanding rights and curtailing the power of the privileged. Everything else is simply a means to one or the other end. Everything Bush has done in office has served conservative ends by that meaning of the word. Bush is certainly no moderate.

Oreo:

You've said several times now that you were an Obama supporter and a contributor to his campaign, yet you have also expressed views on the Iraq war and other issues that are completely contrary to where Obama stands. My question, and this is pure curiosity, is this: WHY were you an Obama supporter? I can't see any reason at all, unless the name you've chosen indicates you're a black person and you were supporting Obama because he too is black. You seem to disagree with him just about across the board, so other than that your former support makes no sense to me whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,090

United_States     United

Re: Americans Believe Obama on Race and Wright.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
Liberalism, in contrast, is about expanding rights and curtailing the power of the privileged..

.
Liberalism once meant that. It was once an honorable word. Now it means defining people by what, rather than who, they are, and dealing with people based on group identity. This means the destruction of the individual.

I no longer use the term "liberal" - only "left".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks