Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

View Poll Results: Should voters care more about Wright or Penn?
Penn 4 40.00%
Wright 6 60.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
CorpMediaSux CorpMediaSux is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,331

   
Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

Well Karma is a funny thing isn't it? Weeks after Clinton "went there" by claiming that Jeremiah Wright "wouldnt be her pastor." She is forced to kick Mark Penn, one of the most powerful strategists in the Clinton campaign out of her inner circle.

Why?

Because recently held talks with the Colombian government as CEO of a lobbying firm paid 300,000 by the Colombian government to assist the passage of a "free trade" deal with the U.S. Federal government. The problem? Clinton is on record opposing the deal. Whether she actually thinks the deal is a bad idea in this election she has been forced to take this position in her attempt to appeal to working class voters in rust belt states like Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania.

Now over the last month there has been a debate on this board about the role of Rev. Wright and "guilt by association." But what do you think voters in states directly effected by these kinds of trade deals should consider more. The offensive words of Barack Obama's former spiritual advisor? Or the long standing paid relationship between Mark Penn and Clinton?

Clearly people know what I think, but I'm curious as to the strongest anti-Wright folks which they think is worse. And how would you make a decision if these were the only two criteria you'd use.

Usual disclaimers about staying on topic and not being jerks
__________________
Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he’s president he’ll take on, and I quote, 'the old boys’ network in Washington.' I’m not making this up. This is somebody been in Congress for 26 years, who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign. And now he tells us that he’s the one who’s gonna take on the old boys' network,” he said. “In the McCain campaign that’s called a staff meeting!- Obama, 9/17/2008
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
Oreo Oreo is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,243

   
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorpMediaSux View Post
Well Karma is a funny thing isn't it? Weeks after Clinton "went there" by claiming that Jeremiah Wright "wouldnt be her pastor." She is forced to kick Mark Penn, one of the most powerful strategists in the Clinton campaign out of her inner circle.

Why?

Because recently held talks with the Colombian government as CEO of a lobbying firm paid 300,000 by the Colombian government to assist the passage of a "free trade" deal with the U.S. Federal government. The problem? Clinton is on record opposing the deal. Whether she actually thinks the deal is a bad idea in this election she has been forced to take this position in her attempt to appeal to working class voters in rust belt states like Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania.

Now over the last month there has been a debate on this board about the role of Rev. Wright and "guilt by association." But what do you think voters in states directly effected by these kinds of trade deals should consider more. The offensive words of Barack Obama's former spiritual advisor? Or the long standing paid relationship between Mark Penn and Clinton?

Clearly people know what I think, but I'm curious as to the strongest anti-Wright folks which they think is worse. And how would you make a decision if these were the only two criteria you'd use.

Usual disclaimers about staying on topic and not being jerks
There has been lots of mistakes made by both Hillary & Obama. But the pastor disaster tops all. I doubt Pastor Wright has hurt Obama in the primary, & it looks like the Clintons are to be a thing of the past.

The general election though, Obama is going to get hurt by Pastor Wright, & this weatherman underground, whom we don't know much about yet. Bombing the Pentagon, & a police station. Who the Obama campaign said that Obama had a friendly relationship with.

Hopefully, we don't get another speech from Obama regarding home grown terrorism, ha.ha.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 13,396

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

There needs to be a "neither" option...

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
CorpMediaSux CorpMediaSux is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,331

   
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

oh oops, sorry
__________________
Yesterday, John McCain actually said that if he’s president he’ll take on, and I quote, 'the old boys’ network in Washington.' I’m not making this up. This is somebody been in Congress for 26 years, who put seven of the most powerful Washington lobbyists in charge of his campaign. And now he tells us that he’s the one who’s gonna take on the old boys' network,” he said. “In the McCain campaign that’s called a staff meeting!- Obama, 9/17/2008
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 13,396

Scotland     Colorado

Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright



It's an understandable oversight. For me, neither is a major issue; McCain's got his share of assholes that have associated with him, as well. I think that in the grand scheme of things neither of these guys will be important.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
soot's Avatar
soot soot is offline
U.S. Senator

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: N.J.
Posts: 772

United_States     New_Jersey

Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

I think the Penn deal is a simple conflict of interests between two employers (Clinton on the one hand and Burson-Marstellar on the other) and a shared employee (Penn).

There really isn't anything immoral, unethical, or dirty involved.

One boss supports one policy, the other boss represents an opposing policy, and Penn found himself in the middle and in a postion where by serving two masters he was making one of them (Clinton) look a little hypocritical at a point in time where the cost of hipocracy was greater than whatever value Penn brought to her campaign.

When you compare that to Obama's 20 year long stint worshiping at the knee of a blatant and militant racist I think the comparison becomes fairly elementary for any thinking man.

Wright will eventually prove to be an albatross. If he doesn't bring the whole campaign down he's definately going to come back and hurt it, at least to a small degree, once the Republican spin machine starts in with a concerted effort against Obama rather than the cat-and-mouse toying they're currently up to as they attempt to keep the blood flowing in what ammounts to a knife fight between Barack and Hillary.

Mark Penn will be yesterday's news by tomorrow at the latest.
__________________
...Old Europe, a once-dominant region now reduced to sucking at the geopolitical teat of America... they spent the better part of the last millennium conquering the world and taking the good stuff home with them... And what do they get for their troubles? Ungrateful colonies demanding their independence. And after you taught them how to play cricket!...

-Jon Stewart
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
Alex Alex is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles Ca
Posts: 7,138

United_States    
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

Penn and Teller, oops I mean Penn and Hillary, disagree on a specific policy. BFD. Pastor Wright hates America. How are these related? They aren't. Your application is rejected. Next time you see Mr Penn screaming from the pulpit "GOD DAMN AMERICA!!" you can reapply.
__________________
"My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to
change it." -- Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008
goober's Avatar
goober goober is online now
Vice President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 9,940

   
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

Make a note of those names, they'll make great trivia questions in a couple of years..................
Along with "Who ran against President Obama in 2008?"
__________________
“The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine.”

Senator Thad Cochran, Mississippi (R)
on McCain

“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico (R)
on McCain

“My anger did not help my campaign ... People don’t like angry candidates very much.”

McCain on McCain
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008
Bunz's Avatar
Bunz Bunz is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Independant Idealist

 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Unalaska
Posts: 1,176

Alaska    
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

I dont think it will make much of a difference as either democrat is going to skate into the WH. I did vote for Penn for a few reasons, Hillary yelled and stomped about Obama when he said he was against NAFTA but may or maynot have told the Canadians something else secretly.

When it comes to Penn and Hillary Id like to know when they became aware of this conflict, did they do something about it at that moment or wait until someone called them out on it? We are talking about her top political strategist and he was paid to work in something she is adamantly against or so she says.

Plus dont we already have a free trade deal set up with the Colombians? I thought it was cash and guns for ahhh...soft drinks in powder form
__________________
Abstinence Education at its finest:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
I wonder how your governor got pregnant....
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008
Sheriff Sheriff is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,114

United_States     United_States

Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

I have chosen Penn; because I don't believe majority of Americans are all unaware of the things going on in Black churchs and Rev. Wright issue gave us a chace to settle the past conflicts by talking openly about them.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is online now
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 12,126

United_States    
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

not voting......this has zero to do with one another....alex has it right imho...
__________________
Obama-e fungis nati homines....
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008
TSGracchus TSGracchus is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 2,242

   
Re: Guilt By Association: Penn vs. Wright

Penn. I was originally not going to vote because of the way the question was worded, with that "should" in there, and strictly speaking, I think voters shouldn't give a fart in their undies about either one. But Clinton's association with Penn does resonate with Bill Clinton's support for "free trade" agreements while in office. Let's not forget that NAFTA was not a Republican initiative.

I also think, without any equivocation, that the voters these candidates need to woo, and have a prayer of wooing, WILL care more about Penn, or at any rate about the issues Penn represents.

There seem to be a number of people on this forum who have a real problem with Wright, and toss words like "hate America" and "blatant racist" around. I would imagine that there are quite a substantial minority of American voters who will feel the same way. What I do not believe, though, is that any significant fraction of those would be Obama voters were there no such person as Rev. Wright. The people here who are so concerned about Wright and what he represents also have political views that tell me they'd have to be crazy to vote for Obama.

It isn't going to hurt him, in short.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online