Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
Well he took care of a minority constituency pretty well....

All the taxpayers of Arizona were helping pay for all kinds of programs for the local indian tribes. Seems like someone of your demonstrated ideology might have a problem with that.

I'm not sure what you mean when you speak of Hillary above. The phrase "I bet you're on Hillary's" makes no sense to me.

The '90s excuse works less well for McCain thana it does for Obama entering during the Bush Administration. Obama's first stint as a senator was during a time of much more gridlock. the 109th congress was much more of a "do nothing" congress than the 101st.
yes agreed, re: the expense etc. for Indian tribes etc. ( that would be federal money would it not) BUT I have a soft spot for them, and thats my problem and fully admit I have a hypocritical bent when discussing remuneration to them etc. My bad.

my remarks were flip LBS, yes his record is skimpy, and my remark; “you're on hillarys too” meant to guess that you were checking her record as well....which in fact might provide a handy comparative view.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #332 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
Yes, in 25 years that's what you or I would have done. However according to the knowledge or lack thereof displayed by McCain I assert that he wasn't doing those things.

In fact given McCain's incredible ignorance regarding even mundane issues I'd say that he probably was too busy cheating on his wife to do anything important. After all it took him nearly 13 years to get a campaign finance reform bill passed. Of course McCain never would have been able to get off the ground without the help of disgraced publisher Duke Tully, who was found to be creating fictitious military records.

McCain's opposition to the M.L.K. holiday is a saga all on its own. A tale of bigotry and hypocrisy on McCain's part.

In 1998 he proposed legislation that would increase taxes on the tobacco industry in addition to creating more federal beauracracy.

McCain has spent 25 years in politics doing things like trying to limit free speech, opposing federal holidays dedicated to M.L.K. jr. and affiliating himself with criminals. However he has not spent any of that time actually familiarizing himself with anything involving geopolitics.

uh yeah okay...CLOSE UP SHOP everyone.........hes a dolt....ajax reads minds and knows exactly what mccain has done, and what he thought, so we're pulling up stakes.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #333 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,488

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
uh yeah okay...CLOSE UP SHOP everyone.........hes a dolt....ajax reads minds and knows exactly what mccain has done, and what he thought, so we're pulling up stakes.
Wow thanks for not actually addressing what was brought up.

Maybe you can explain why Obama correctly identified the leader of Germany as Chancellor Angela Merkel but McCain went off about "President Putin of Germany". In order for McCain to make this kind of gaffe he had to have several facts wrong. This isn't just a slip of tongue. After only 3 years on the national scene I have to give Obama credit for being more knowledgeable in foriegn affairs than some people who have 25 years of experience.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #334 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

frankly your rant of an answer didn't appear to warrant much more than that as your mind is made up and there really wasn't anything to address that was worth it........just as the above, a gross overestimation and underestimation in one breath, well done. If a week abroad and 2 years as a senator and a complete and autter lack of attention regards his own european nato affairs comm.. didn't move his ass, I guess sleeping at a Holiday is is next on the list, then we can can make him god.....sayanora.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #335 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is online now
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,527

United_States    
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
yes agreed, re: the expense etc. for Indian tribes etc. ( that would be federal money would it not) BUT I have a soft spot for them, and thats my problem and fully admit I have a hypocritical bent when discussing remuneration to them etc. My bad.
Well, I was more or less making an argument for argument's sake on that one.

Sorry if it looked like I was going beyond attacking your argument there. That wasn't my intent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
my remarks were flip LBS, yes his record is skimpy, and my remark; “you're on hillarys too” meant to guess that you were checking her record as well....which in fact might provide a handy comparative view.
I'll let you make that comparison if you want. My agenda was to demonstrate that McCain's first years were not all that impressive when put aside Obama's.
__________________

Congratulations President-Elect Obama
Reply With Quote
  #336 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
andy764383's Avatar
andy764383 andy764383 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: The U.S.
Posts: 1,281

   
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

Quote:
If you watch Obama closely, his body language, his voice tone, the way he reacts to unexpected tough questions, you'll quickly notice that this man has nothing to hide.
On Meet the Press, Brokaw, citing a recent USA Today editorial, asked Obama why he cannot bring himself to acknowledge the surge worked better than he and other skeptics thought it would and then asked, "What does that stubbornness say about the kind of president that he would be?", Obama replied

"Well, listen. I, I actually think that there's no doubt that the violence has gone down more than any of us anticipated, including President Bush and John McCain. If you, if you would--if you had talked to them and, and said, "You know what? We're going to bring down violence to the levels that we have," I think--I, I, I suspect USA Today's own editorial board wouldn't have anticipated that. That's not a, that's not a hard thing to acknowledge, that the situations have improved more rapidly than we had anticipated. That doesn't change the broader strategic questions that we've got to deal with."


I think I see what you mean when you say he has nothing to hide. Other than his bad judgment on the most important political issue of the last two years. And his attempts to hide his bad judgment. And his attempts to change the debate.

OK, this is where you say "but he was against the war from the beginning."

But lets talk about his speech in Berlin.

I'm sure the terrorists are sitting around the camp fire having a kumbaya love fest, talking about how we should all "stand as one," and "tear down the walls," etc., etc.

OK, this is where you say "but Bush hasn't caught Osama yet."

Sheep.

I'll stick with sending lots of metal downrange.
__________________
Andy
Cynical Optimist
Reply With Quote
  #337 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

yes I saw that too, he was floundering.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #338 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,667

United_States    
Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
If that's the spin that makes you feel good.....

But, Like I said...Obama had already planned to go before McCain brought it up. It wasn't the McCain camp's idea, but they decided that it would be advantageous to press Obama on it... and they were wrong.
Youre blaming Obamas actions on McCain. Why not just judge him on his own merit?
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #339 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
Well, it sounds to me like the McCain camp made their own bed on this one.

Obama had planned to go to Iraq/Afganistan anyway...prior to McCain and his campaign calling on Obama to take the trip. But with the clammoring, it almost looked as if Obama was caving to McCain's demands and the McCain campaign could make political hay out of it. Now, of course, the trip ended up getting huge coverage and positive attention, so it looks to have worked out in Obama's favor.

This is a classic case of "Be careful watch you wish for".

A huge backfire for McCain and his strategists.

Me thinks you are ahead of the game. The trip overall for the prty faithful was manna, he doesn’t need to feed manna to the converted, he needs to feed it to the middle, and they are ambivalent I think.
So, I don't think it backfired at all. I think it was a wash t an extent BUT it does highlight Obama meanderings and slips and slides regard how to craft an answer to McCain re: the war...


the old I was against it from the start means diddley squat at this point, because Obama cannot just say he was wrong on the surge, obscuring his larger point. And add to that, that IF the surge and its success continues, people are not going to feel the "war" was a failure and their memories of it being wrong from day one will fade.
No not among the lefty faithful, but among the middle, were the battle is being fought, they might say yea, we really may not have had to go, bit THIS success is fresher in their minds and the US has done what though he may not have articulated well, what Bush was after all along. Alls well that ends well.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #340 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is online now
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,527

United_States    
Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Youre blaming Obamas actions on McCain.
That's not what I'm doing... What I was doing was pointing out the impotency of the move by the McCain camp to publicly flog Obama for not having made a trip to the warzones and then whine like school girls once Obama did.

I guess you can think whatever you want. You're either not reading my words or they're getting lost on you. Not my problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Why not just judge him on his own merit?
I think, on the whole, Obama's trip can be judged as quite a success. 1) he got great photos and footage. 2) Many Foreign leaders he met had favorable things to say about him. 3) He garnered a huge amount of media coverage (at the media's choice) which culminated in a speech in front of 200,000 people. 4) He committed zero gaffes.
__________________

Congratulations President-Elect Obama
Reply With Quote
  #341 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is online now
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,083

   
Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
4) He committed zero gaffes.
Except for him blowing off our injured troops because he couldn't take cameras.

Obama's a fucking scumbag...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #342 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is online now
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,527

United_States    
Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
Me thinks you are ahead of the game. The trip overall for the prty faithful was manna, he doesn’t need to feed manna to the converted, he needs to feed it to the middle, and they are ambivalent I think.
So, I don't think it backfired at all. I think it was a wash t an extent BUT it does highlight Obama meanderings and slips and slides regard how to craft an answer to McCain re: the war...
I consider myself part of the middle.... I'm neither a right or a left idealogue.

I'm conservative personally and my outlook on politics is pragmatic and not a game to me.

I don't think very many people are ambivalent about this election or about Obama's trip. Certainly everyone recognizes that domestic issues are top priority for the electorate, and many people recognize that our foreign policy has a direct affect on us at home.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
the old I was against it from the start means diddley squat at this point, because Obama cannot just say he was wrong on the surge, obscuring his larger point. And add to that, that IF the surge and its success continues, people are not going to feel the "war" was a failure and their memories of it being wrong from day one will fade.
No not among the lefty faithful, but among the middle, were the battle is being fought, they might say yea, we really may not have had to go, bit THIS success is fresher in their minds and the US has done what though he may not have articulated well, what Bush was after all along. Alls well that ends well.

Obama has conceded that violence is down and that the extra troops quelled the violence multiple times in multiple interviews.

I'm not sure what admission you're looking for? He's done everything but say "The Surge Worked". I have no problem with what he's said because that statement is an oversimplification and perhaps not even a complete truism.

"The Surge" has been turned into a vague marketing gimmick... A silver bullet that singlehandedly explains and accounts for strides of progress in Iraq. Certainly Obama needs to defuse it a bit better. Perhaps the politically expedient thing to do would just be to admit that he was wrong in assuming that additional troops would not quell the violence....

This whole issue is meant to change the focus. Likely, the McCain campaign is hoping that if they pound on "The Surge"..."The Surge!".. the voters will lose sight of the forest for the trees.
__________________

Congratulations President-Elect Obama
Reply With Quote
  #343 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is online now
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 4,527

United_States    
Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Except for him blowing off our injured troops because he couldn't take cameras.

Obama's a fucking scumbag...
Yeah, Obama only saw thousands of troops in person while on his trip... and visited other wounded troops in Iraq without cameras or reporters present.

The whole notion that Obama doesn't care about the troops is bullshit and a complete political ruse from the McCain campaign.

The electorate is not comprised of retards that can be convinced that Obama hates America and our Troops.... well, at least I hope I can give the electorate that much credit.
__________________

Congratulations President-Elect Obama
Reply With Quote
  #344 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,735

United_States     Russian

Re: Citizen Obama Speaks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Except for him blowing off our injured troops because he couldn't take cameras.

Obama's a fucking scumbag...
Why should he visit them, anyway? I'm not voting for Obama, but it has nothing to do with his not visiting me personally. Likewise, if he did visit me, it would not change my mind about him. I simply don't vote for people based on "did he personally visit me or not." I also realize that the responsibilities of the POTUS do not include personal visits to arbitrarily-selected people/organizations for no better reason than to supposedly show that "he cares." It's to influence national policy.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #345 (permalink)  
Old 07-28-2008
Soaring Soaring is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 326

   
Re: Obama's speech in Berlin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Which is complete bullshit, as I doubt there are too many American citizens that Germany would treat in this manner. If the Germans know they have a potential President in their midst, why doesn't he simply acknowledge that?

Instead, he comes across with some patronizing "not as a Presidential candidate" bullshit. If he wasn't a Presidential candidate, he wouldn't have been there.

What's funny is watching retarded libs lap this shit up as if it's their last meal...
Exactly. He was there as a presidential candidate, and spent a ton of his campain money on the trip for that very reason. He also made the mistake of lying again, just like he did in his speech in Selma. I'm not quite sure if Obama even knows the difference between truth and fantasy.
>>>>To top it off, right-wing bloggers actually fact-checked his speech. In a direct assault on Obama’s self-anointed right to fashion reality according to his own whim, a London paper found several ‘misstatements’ (that’s liberalspeak for lies) in his historic speech. The audacity! <<<< CFP: All Obama, All The Time
Reply With Quote
Reply