Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 1,876

   
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
No, it's not. That only exists in the anti-choice community. (There, now YOU can take issue with MY unfair and misleading labeling. Just to keep it fair.)
Actually, I am pro-choice. I'm just not pro-killing the unborn for convenience. A woman has the right to choose to have sex or not. If she chooses not to have sex (i.e. she was raped), then her rights certainly outweigh those of her unborn child. If she chose to have sex, then she took the chance of creating life in her body. At that point, the child's right to life outweighs her right to ... "convenience"? Of course, there is no right to convenience. The argument that the unborn child violates her right to privacy is fallacious. She willingly put herself into a situation where a possible outcome is pregnancy - the beginning of the life of another human.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
When a woman is pregnant, except in the late stages of pregnancy, we refer to the human organism growing in her womb, in the present tense, as an embryo or a fetus. When we refer to "her baby," we are speaking in the future tense, in that she is "going to have a baby." There is only one exception, and that is a spontaneous abortion, which we sometimes call "losing the baby." Despite the grammatical construction, I regard this as future-tense also; what is lost is the hope or possibility of a baby, not an actual baby -- as anyone can see by observing what is aborted.
I don't know who you are referring to as "we", but except in the cases when pro-abortion people such as yourself are advocating the killing of the unborn child, I have never heard an unborn baby referred to as a "fetus". In my world, and I would guess in the worlds of all but the most militant Planned Parenthood crowd, that which is in the womb is referred to as a baby.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
This stops being true in the late stages of pregnancy. There is very little difference between a baby right after birth and right before birth. But to call an embryo in the early stages of pregnancy s "baby," when it bears a closer biological resemblance to a primitive colony organism, is sheer misleading propaganda. It causes images to arise in the minds of the ill-informed of newborns hacked to pieces by chain-saws -- and that is of course the reason why the term is deliberately chosen.
So am I correct to believe that you are vehemently opposed to all abortions after the first trimester? After all, that "primitive colony organism" already has a heart beat at roughly three weeks after conception. So by ninety days, it surely is human enough that only the most barbaric of those amongst us would consider destroying it, right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
That's one bit of medical terminology that has become common parlance among the well-educated, especially those who are expecting children. In any case, medical terminology can be quite informative. Even more so, medical KNOWLEDGE -- which in this case tells us that an embryo at conception has no brain or nervous system and therefore no feelings or human thoughts -- can be quite informative. I recommend it highly.
Well gollllly, Mr. edumacated, I ain't nearly as "well-educated" as you is, so that must be why me and the missus never called any of our younguns "fetuses" when she was 'spectin'.

That, or in real life, hardly anyone in this country (save the staunch pro-abortion crowd) refer to their unborn children as fetuses.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
There are no pro-abortion people.
Right, "anti-baby" people. I keep forgetting.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
Personally, I find myself respecting people less when they lie than when they tell the truth, but to each his own.
I don't necessarily think that you are lying, I just think that you are deluded as to how most people really are. As far as I know, you truly do hang out with that fraction of a percent of the population that refers to their unborn children as fetuses.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
I feel fine about myself. No worries there.
Bully for you; and trust me, I wasn't worried.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
The proper term, though, is "pro-choice." If you find that too broad, implying that those who want abortion made illegal are generalized authoritarians with no respect for freedom, you may specify "pro-choice on abortion," which is about as accurate as one can get. (This allows you to truthfully claim to be pro-choice on some things, which I assume you are, while still differentiating yourself from those who are pro-choice specifically on abortion. It has the further advantage over "pro-abortion" or any of the other terms you have used, that it is not a falsehood.)
Yes, "proper" terminology. Defining the terms of the debate is half the battle, right? As I said earlier, I am "pro-choice". You, however, are not anything like me. If you don't like the term "pro-abortion", maybe you could go for something like, "pro-killing the unborn when it's convenient"? Too wordy?



Quote:
Originally Posted by TSGracchus View Post
If it's kicking, it's at least well on the way to babyhood. But of course, an embryo in the first three months after conception, which is when the overwhelming majority of abortions are performed, never kicks.
Again I will ask, do you vehemently oppose all abortions after the first trimester, when that unborn child is "well on the way to babyhood"?
Reply With Quote
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2009
phungus's Avatar
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 925

Oregon     United_States

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

There is a thread for this you know:

http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/abor...-abortion.html

I fail to see how this well hashed abortion debate you all seem to want to derail this thread into pertains to the issues of the thread.

Also smurf, unless you're against the Pill, and oral contraceptives in general, you yourself are "pro-abortion".
Reply With Quote
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 1,876

   
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by phungus View Post
There is a thread for this you know:

http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/abor...-abortion.html

I fail to see how this well hashed abortion debate you all seem to want to derail this thread into pertains to the issues of the thread.

Also smurf, unless you're against the Pill, and oral contraceptives in general, you yourself are "pro-abortion".
Technically, the thread has to do with "GOP Favorability". In the ensuing discussion, one of the many differences between the Republican and Democrat platforms (abortion), has crept into the thread. I'm not sure that constitutes "derailing this thread".

Not if ovulation has not occurred, phungus.
Reply With Quote
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,343

United_States    
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by smurf View Post
Technically, the thread has to do with "GOP Favorability". In the ensuing discussion, one of the many differences between the Republican and Democrat platforms (abortion), has crept into the thread. I'm not sure that constitutes "derailing this thread".

Not if ovulation has not occurred, phungus.
Then argue about abortion in the other thread. Just say that you differ on that particular issue here and maybe get back to the big picture. We're just saying....
Reply With Quote
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 23,724

United_States    
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

yes, the topic is the gop and its irreversible spin into oblivion.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 1,876

   
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
yes, the topic is the gop and its irreversible spin into oblivion.
Fair enough.

Will the Democrats come and hunt us down like wild animals once the party disintegrates, or will they be merciful and just send us to reeducation camps so that we may learn to follow the messiah, in all his perfectness?
Reply With Quote
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 1,876

   
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
Then argue about abortion in the other thread. Just say that you differ on that particular issue here and maybe get back to the big picture. We're just saying....
My apologies. Back to the topic.
Reply With Quote
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,901

Earth     United_States

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Here's a set of polls that look totally one sided, and guess what, they were taken before Obama defeated the pirates and saved the Captain.


yes he courageously answered the phone and said "okay do your job" and thus he was able to single-handedly subdue the pirate menace with his heavenly obama-aura.
__________________
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
John Drake's Avatar
Secretary of State
The Last Eisenhower Republican

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 5,268

   
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by redrover View Post
The GOP Needs some fresh ideas not just My taxes are too high Poor Me!
Oh, "Stop killling alll the unborn"

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
how about 'stop bankrupting America !'
Iraq did that already

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
yes, the topic is the gop and its irreversible spin into oblivion.
Which it will, the happiest political prospect of my life.

The ONLY way the GOP can save even a vestige of itself now is if Obama's policies tank immediately and big time and basically even THAT won't help them at this point since they've come right out and SAID they wanted it to happen, they have also set themselves up to be blamed for it, if it does.

It the Dems policies succeed they look like traitors who wanted bad things for everybody.

If the Dems policies fail they look like traitors who CAUSED bad things for everybody.

They're nude, blued, rude and tattooed, no way out.

Anybody see any way around this?

And Matt, I don't want to strangle or exile anybody. I just want the GOP ended as a viable political party. Seen something as we see the Prohibition party, or the Communists. They've always struck me as profoundly UnAmerican, a coalition of Royalists, Religious fanatics, oligarchs of several stripes, and Plutocrats, all the old crap this country was founded to get away from coupled with the most evil philosophy that was nearly totally home grown.
__________________
Alizee Jacotay, the reason god invented hips

Last edited by John Drake; 04-16-2009 at 08:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Hohenwald
Posts: 2,187

United_States     Tennessee

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

So long as the Republican Party is led by such as McConnell, Boehner, and Cantor, there can be no comeback. So long as political contributions mean more to them than the well-being of the average citizen, the people will not follow them. Until they can figure out how we can, as a nation and a people, get things done, and until they quit being "the party of NO," there is no chance that they can regain the respect and allegiance of the average citizen.
Reply With Quote
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 1,876

   
Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
Which it will, the happiest political prospect of my life.
When it doesn't, you won't become self destructive, will you? I worry that you are setting yourself up for a terrible disappointment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
The ONLY way the GOP can save even a vestige of itself now is if Obama's policies tank immediately and big time and basically even THAT won't help them at this point since they've come right out and SAID they wanted it to happen, they have also set themselves up to be blamed for it, if it does.
You are confusing, "I told you so", with "wanting it to happen". No one (in the GOP, anyway) "wants" the nation rocketing towards a socialist pit of oblivion where the government controls even more aspects of our lives.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
It the Dems policies succeed they look like traitors who wanted bad things for everybody.
Those policies can't "succeed". Unless by "succeed", you mean a socialist utopia where nobody works, and the government showers the citizenry with all that they desire. Of course, with no Americans left working, do you think that the rest of the world will keep admiring our green paper and sending us real goods forever, so that we may all sit on our asses in government housing eating Cheetos watching Jerry Springer all day?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
If the Dems policies fail they look like traitors who CAUSED bad things for everybody.
Again, see above about "I told you so", vs. "wanting it to happen", or in this case, "CAUSING" it to happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
They're nude, blued, rude and tattooed, no way out.

Anybody see any way around this?
The foundations for the recovery will start to be laid around November, 2010. Full recovery will take much longer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
And Matt, I don't want to strangle or exile anybody. I just want the GOP ended as a viable political party. Seen something as we see the Prohibition party, or the Communists. They've always struck me as profoundly UnAmerican, a coalition of Royalists, Religious fanatics, oligarchs of several stripes, and Plutocrats, all the old crap this country was founded to get away from coupled with the most evil philosophy that was nearly totally home grown.
Good God, man! Democrats running amok with no one to oppose their insanity? We would be completely ruined within a decade.
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,901

Earth     United_States

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by lineman View Post
Obama will have this nation so screwed up in four years that the GOP will cruise into power in 2010.
so in four years, everyone's going to travel back two years in time and vote in the 2010 elections?
__________________
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Hohenwald
Posts: 2,187

United_States     Tennessee

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by bg85 View Post
so in four years, everyone's going to travel back two years in time and vote in the 2010 elections?
Lay off, willya?

That's the kind of creative math that's going to solve all our problems.
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Speakeasy's Avatar
Administrator
Sauté my dollar bills.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 25,542

United_States     Virginia

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by bg85 View Post
so in four years, everyone's going to travel back two years in time and vote in the 2010 elections?
That's just how screwed up it will be. The space time continuum is doomed!
__________________
“For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.” - Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,901

Earth     United_States

Re: GOP Favorability - hits record low

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy View Post
That's just how screwed up it will be. The space time continuum is doomed!
i think from now on whenever you post i'm going to imagine you speaking in the good doctor carl sagan's voice.


"the space time conTINuummm is dOOmed."
__________________
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online