Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2009
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 2,305

New_York     Earth

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

It's a fundamental question of whether the values are right or wrong.

Whether or not promoter is strong enough to live up to them is ultimately of consequence only to them.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2009
fishjoel's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,253

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

If you stand for nothing that have to live up to, right?
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
Angry American's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 2,570

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
First

I think it is better to have values that you fall short of living up to rather than not having values at all.

And to me it is only hypocrisy if you

A) Make no effort to live up to those values or never intended to.
B) Never really believed in those values in the first place.

Second

A point many people miss is that "family values" and "economics" are connected in many respects. Premarital sex for example. If you avoid premarital sex, you avoid teenage pregnancy and pregnancy out of wedlock. Both of which it is pretty well established have economic costs for both the people involved and the nation as a whole.

Third

There are limits to the influence a person can have within their own family. Values cannot be transferred to family members any more than athletic ability.

Children sometimes rebel against their parents beliefs. Brothers and sisters choose a radically different path. Even parents of someone expousing family values sometimes do things that are monumentally embarrassing.

Why should that reflect poorly on the person promoting those values?
Such a cop out. If you have values you live by them, period. And as a parent you do instill your values on your children, but they follow your example. So if you say one thing but do another, they're going to disregard what you say.

I have no problem with premarital sex, I had lots of it. Hell I wouldn't have found my wife if I hadn't had premarital sex.

And the word is espouse, not expouse.

Children rebel against parents, primarily for a couple of reasons. 1) The parents don't live up to rules they impose on their children (doing other than what they say. 2) The parents impose unrealistic limits on their growth and development.

Either you have values and you live by them, or you trumpet values for political gain. And if life throws you a curve ball that smacks your values upside the head, then you probably need to modify your values.

Why anyone would look to politicians to validate or champion their own values, is just naive, in my opinion. I don't want politicians who impose personal behavior.
__________________
"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,457

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

the problem with 'family values' candidates to me is not whether or not they espouse those values in their lives, it is typically for their lack of policy proposals to accompany their 'values' that turns me off. "Family values" is emotional and superficial political pandering if the candidate cannot provide a coherent policy platform to accompany these 'values.' (images they are trying to score points on) read sarah palin.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
Doctor Who's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Action Figure

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,193

United_States     North_Carolina

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry American View Post
Children rebel against parents, primarily for a couple of reasons. 1) The parents don't live up to rules they impose on their children (doing other than what they say. 2) The parents impose unrealistic limits on their growth and development.
I don't know AA. I'm not sure that it's all that black and white. I grew up with a sister. We are only a year and a half apart. I pretty much did everything my parents told me to do. I got in trouble every once in a while but my sister was outright deceitful. She would tell our dad that she was going to church just so she could have the car. He caught her when, after a few months, he noticed the checks he gave her for the church were never cashed. In know, right? Duh. And that is just one example. She used to sneak out at night also. So we had two kids with the same parents, treated the same...well, I was the favorite, still am ...but in our childhood, had very different views with respect to proper behavior.

Quote:
Why anyone would look to politicians to validate or champion their own values, is just naive, in my opinion. I don't want politicians who impose personal behavior.
Totally agreed. Unfortunately, they do it on both sides of the aisle.
__________________
"If you think about it, UPS and FedEx are doing just fine," he said. "It's the post office that's always having problems." Barack Obama on government run healthcare. 08/11/2009

American by birth.
Conservative by the grace of God.

Still sore about the war of northern aggression.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
fishjoel's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,253

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry American View Post
Such a cop out. If you have values you live by them, period. And as a parent you do instill your values on your children, but they follow your example. So if you say one thing but do another, they're going to disregard what you say.
False. No one lives up to even their own values. Everyone has done something they are ashamed of. Everyone has done many things they know to be wrong. There is not one person that has lived up to even their own values.
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,833

United_States     Virginia

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
Inspired by all the Gov. Sarah Palin, Gov. Sanford stuff of course.

Assume a politician male or female, Democrat or Republican believes the following:

1) Against abortion rights
2) Against any kind of premarital or extramarital sex.
3) Against any kind of marriage aside from one man, one woman.
4) Goes to church and is generally seen to be in favor of religion.

What does the background of a politician have to be in order for you to consider their personal lives of them or their family to be off limits to attack or insult?

I'm betting I know the answer from many.


a "D" after their name
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
Angry American's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 2,570

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishjoel View Post
False. No one lives up to even their own values. Everyone has done something they are ashamed of. Everyone has done many things they know to be wrong. There is not one person that has lived up to even their own values.
Speak for yourself. You're just making excuses for the false prophets, and hypocrites the sheeple worship as moral champions.
__________________
"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009
Angry American's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 2,570

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Who View Post
I don't know AA. I'm not sure that it's all that black and white. I grew up with a sister. We are only a year and a half apart. I pretty much did everything my parents told me to do. I got in trouble every once in a while but my sister was outright deceitful. She would tell our dad that she was going to church just so she could have the car. He caught her when, after a few months, he noticed the checks he gave her for the church were never cashed. In know, right? Duh. And that is just one example. She used to sneak out at night also. So we had two kids with the same parents, treated the same...well, I was the favorite, still am ...but in our childhood, had very different views with respect to proper behavior.
Nothing is ever black & white. I take it you're a man? Right there that makes a difference. I have 2 daughters, 3 & 5, the 3 year old is a better artist already, then I recently found out my 5 year old was almost blind in 1 eye, after she told me she couldn't see out of "this" eye. I just wish we were able to catch her condition earlier. I only sited 2 very general causes, I'm sure there are as many reasons why we rebel, as there are people. When I rebelled it wasn't as much against my parents, as it was against society.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor Who View Post
Totally agreed. Unfortunately, they do it on both sides of the aisle.
And how do liberals impose personal behavior?
__________________
"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."

-Thomas Jefferson

Last edited by Angry American; 07-08-2009 at 02:20 PM. Reason: fix code
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Active Citizen

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 89

United_States     Arkansas

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Politicians and for that matter everyone else try to impose their moral values on the people around them.

They might do this deliberately or not, but if nothing else but example, people influence the moral values of those around them.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,014

   
Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
Inspired by all the Gov. Sarah Palin, Gov. Sanford stuff of course.

Assume a politician male or female, Democrat or Republican believes the following:

1) Against abortion rights
2) Against any kind of premarital or extramarital sex.
3) Against any kind of marriage aside from one man, one woman.
4) Goes to church and is generally seen to be in favor of religion.

What does the background of a politician have to be in order for you to consider their personal lives of them or their family to be off limits to attack or insult?

I'm betting I know the answer from many.

One can believe in whatever they want for themselves, but deserve attack when they try to impose their values on others when not necessary.

Abortion and sex are areas where is it wrong to impose on others, and attack is deserved.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,014

   
Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
Politicians and for that matter everyone else try to impose their moral values on the people around them.

They might do this deliberately or not, but if nothing else but example, people influence the moral values of those around them.

WRONG!

In a democratic republic, it is essential to only legislate defense of individual rights, to be as free as possible.
Influencing others by example is not the same as legislating by force.
It is wrong to ever impose your values on other.
You are only justified if they are imposing on you, and you are acting in defense.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Active Citizen

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 89

United_States     Arkansas

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Some would say that legislating against abortion IS NOT legislating morality any more than legislating against murder is.

Or that legislating against homosexual marriage is no more legislating morality than bans on necrophilia, pedophilia, or prostitution.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 15,984

United_States     Colombia

Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
So the argument is going to be by many

"if you can't live up PERFECTLY to the values you advocate you have no business advocating them?"

Isn't it very unreasonable to apply this idea ONLY to family values?

1) Can a politician who never served in the military be allowed to have credible beliefs on military and foreign policy?

2) Can a politician who never set foot on a farm be allowed to have credible beliefs on agriculture policy?

3) Can a politician who received a private school education be allowed to have credible beliefs on public schools.

4) Can a politician who never ran a business of any kind be allowed to have credible beliefs on government economic policies?

5) Can a politician with no legal or judicial background of any kind be allowed to have credible beliefs on the constitution or the role of judgements?

You can go on endlessly. Politicians in general have influence on EVERYTHING at some point but have actual experience in very little.

Finally, one could argue that only a person who has suffered through a terrible divorce or had serious problems with their kids as they grew up can really understand such matters and truly advocate "family values".
Can a politician who has never had an abortion have any credible beliefs on the issue?

Can a politician who has never had extra marital sex have any credible beliefs on adultery?

Can a politician who has not raped and sacrificed a small herd of goats have any...

Well, you probably get my point...
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,341

   
Re: What Background Does A "Family Values" Politician Have To Have To Not Be Attacked

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
So the argument is going to be by many

"if you can't live up PERFECTLY to the values you advocate you have no business advocating them?"

Isn't it very unreasonable to apply this idea ONLY to family values?

1) Can a politician who never served in the military be allowed to have credible beliefs on military and foreign policy?

2) Can a politician who never set foot on a farm be allowed to have credible beliefs on agriculture policy?

3) Can a politician who received a private school education be allowed to have credible beliefs on public schools.

4) Can a politician who never ran a business of any kind be allowed to have credible beliefs on government economic policies?

5) Can a politician with no legal or judicial background of any kind be allowed to have credible beliefs on the constitution or the role of judgements?

You can go on endlessly. Politicians in general have influence on EVERYTHING at some point but have actual experience in very little.

Finally, one could argue that only a person who has suffered through a terrible divorce or had serious problems with their kids as they grew up can really understand such matters and truly advocate "family values".
Right-Wingers really are adept at tap-dancing around an issue eh? I see you put your own parameters, read spin, on the issue...setting it up in a way that makes it seem folks are requiring perfection. Who said this? Noone.

Clearly this is an attempt to spin the Republicans into some innocent saints who are only human and are prone to fail at times inspite of their noble attempts. Nice try, but it just does not wash.

1.) The GOP is chuck full of members who have not served a single hour in service for the country in the military, in fact many who have went out of their way to escape doing that. I have posted links to websites detailing a host of them in the past.

2.) How many farmers are in the GOP?

3.) WTF.com?!?? Education is education? I believe the average person is at least vaguely familiar with the public school system.

4.) GWB, before he took office succesfully ran every. single. busines he was allowed to get his greasy hands on to the ground. That's a fact. How credible was he (in the beginning?)

5.) If a candidate has demonstrated a knowledge on the subject and is intellectually curious I don't see how they could have any problems there. Unlike Sarah Palin who could not cite ONE Supreme Court ruling that she found influential or interesting when asked about it, and this was after SHE HERSELF brought it up in one of her infamous platitudes.

I agree with your final statements, but I'm not sure how that supports your point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commodore View Post
Its the values that are under attack. It could be a Leaping Lesbian Latino of Color, and they would still be mocked. Probably more so, because more "protected" your status, the more you are attacked for "treasonous" behaviors.

That is why Palin is attacked so viciously. She has become influential without singing the feminazi tune.
Its not family values thats under attack Einstein. W As you can see, Barack Obama is THE BEST thing to happen to family values. He's the manifestation of a a great husband, father and friend. Loyal, caring , loving and faithful to his wife and children...clean as a whistle. So much so he kinda harkens back to 'Leave It To Beaver' What a guy! And as you can see America LOVES him for it, including the Democrats who you are FALSELY claiming have some gripe with family values. hen will you grow up and cut out the emotional pre-packaged outbursts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
If someone claimes to be against abortion rights, then has an abortion, they deserve the flack.

If they are against premarital sex, and prefer abstinance education, then their daughter gets knocked up, you deserve the flack for it.

Simple as that.
Its really that simple.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
It seems to me that Dayton doesn't want hypocrites to be called out on their bullshit. Hey Dayton how about this: don't be a hypocrite, don't get attacked. Simple as that.
Basically.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayton3 View Post
First

I think it is better to have values that you fall short of living up to rather than not having values at all.

And to me it is only hypocrisy if you

A) Make no effort to live up to those values or never intended to.
B) Never really believed in those values in the first place.

Second

A point many people miss is that "family values" and "economics" are connected in many respects. Premarital sex for example. If you avoid premarital sex, you avoid teenage pregnancy and pregnancy out of wedlock. Both of which it is pretty well established have economic costs for both the people involved and the nation as a whole.

Third

There are limits to the influence a person can have within their own family. Values cannot be transferred to family members any more than athletic ability.

Children sometimes rebel against their parents beliefs. Brothers and sisters choose a radically different path. Even parents of someone expousing family values sometimes do things that are monumentally embarrassing.

Why should that reflect poorly on the person promoting those values?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online