Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Political Parties, Campaigns & Elections A forum to discuss political parties and elections/campaigns in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009
BamaGuy's Avatar
County Executive

 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 328

   
Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Ok now Ted Kennedy wants it back the way it was....

Ok I know he has brain cancer so I'll cut him a little slack, but come on. You have a law passed so a Republican cannot be put in as an interim senator, and now you want to go back and repeal the law so a Democrat can be put in as an interim senator. Just change the laws at will to fit the current needs I guess.

Hot Air Blog Archive Kennedy wants law changed in Massachusetts … again


This is just typical MO I guess, Democrats protest and it's great to be an American, Republicans protest, and they are just so un-American.

On and On and On
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009
goober's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 13,886

   
Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Deal with it.
Laws can be changed by legislatures.
Back when we had a Republican Governor, the Great and General Court decided that it was in the best interest of the Commonwealth (and the nation for that matter) to hold a special election if a Senate seat became vacant, now that we have Democratic Governor, the danger is passed, and it would benefit the citizens of the Commonwealth to maintain continuity in representation in the Senate.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 24,861

   
Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

I really wish Teddy had been running in '68 instead of Bobby.

Ted Kennedy is a fucking buffoon, and I won't cut him slack for having brain cancer.

It kill him fast enough...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of State
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 4,590

New_York     Earth

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

What would you expect. Eddies integrity is still in Chappaquiddick.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009
fishjoel's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,057

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Deal with it.
Laws can be changed by legislatures.
Back when we had a Republican Governor, the Great and General Court decided that it was in the best interest of the Commonwealth (and the nation for that matter) to hold a special election if a Senate seat became vacant, now that we have Democratic Governor, the danger is passed, and it would benefit the citizens of the Commonwealth to maintain continuity in representation in the Senate.
But to change your very own law...come on....I know you're a partisan hack, but this is a little too much.

And who is it benefiting? The citizens or the Democratic party. Those two are not one in the same.
__________________
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.
- George Bernard Shaw
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2009
California Girl's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
My bite is worst than my bark

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Where there is trouble, I am there!
Posts: 3,336

United_States     California

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Ted Kennedy - living proof that only the good die young.
__________________


Great Quotes from Great Americans:

"With regard to the words 'general welfare', I have always regarded them as qualified by the details of the powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphisis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."James Madison, Father of the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
Disillusioned_1's Avatar
Secretary of State
Rocket Scientist

 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 4,569

United_States     Montana

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

He's not changing the law, he's creating a new law to fill in the seat in the interim. The law for his state says that a special election needs to be held to replace a vacant senate seat - and its not a great deal of time before the election must be held, but it is a couple of months, which makes sense from the viewpoint that if a senator dies suddenly it will take time to organize and campaign to get elected. That law would still be there. All he would like is that the governor be able to appoint a replacement to stand in until the election.

Personally I think Minnesotans got screwed for 6 months with only half their alotted representation simply because Coleman was dragging the election appeals out about 3 months longer than necessary simply to keep dems from the 60 seat majority. In my opinion the MN governor should have been able to appoint a temporary replacement for those 6 months.

We saw in IL what happens when state law says the governor may appoint a PERMANENT replacement. You get a Blagujovich scenario.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 3,415

   
Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

A special election should work just fine, they could be having it now if he had resigned already or better yet would never have had to deal with it at all if people would have stopped voting the drunken limousine liberal into office.

If there is an election odds are it's going to be a Democrat anyway, it's Massachusetts.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
WillRockwell's Avatar
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: US
Posts: 535

Guernsey     New

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishjoel View Post
But to change your very own law...come on....I know you're a partisan hack, but this is a little too much.

And who is it benefiting? The citizens or the Democratic party. Those two are not one in the same.
Why would you object to Kennedy's seat being filled quickly?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
MattInFla's Avatar
Administrator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 32,626

United_States     Florida

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Deal with it.
Laws can be changed by legislatures.
Back when we had a Republican Governor, the Great and General Court decided that it was in the best interest of the Commonwealth (and the nation for that matter) to hold a special election if a Senate seat became vacant, now that we have Democratic Governor, the danger is passed, and it would benefit the citizens of the Commonwealth to maintain continuity in representation in the Senate.
Partisan idiocy has reached a new peak.
__________________
"An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy; because there is a limit beyond which no institution and no property can bear taxation." - John Marshall
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 25,738

United_States    
Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Deal with it.
Laws can be changed by legislatures.
Back when we had a Republican Governor, the Great and General Court decided that it was in the best interest of the Commonwealth (and the nation for that matter) to hold a special election if a Senate seat became vacant, now that we have Democratic Governor, the danger is passed, and it would benefit the citizens of the Commonwealth to maintain continuity in representation in the Senate.
in other words he wants to vote from the grave, and the hypocrisy here is beyond belief, but then again, I never expected anything less. And the fact you don’t care speaks for itself. “Deal” with it, indeed.


the 'danger' has passed


and please, 'maintain continuity", inother words I can get it reversed now that it will benefit me so bumph off the rest of you.....


I gotta bookmark this too......you'll see it it again, bet on it.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
dblack's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 1,471

   
Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Deal with it.
Laws can be changed by legislatures.
Awesome. I think that's covered by the "in your face" clause of the Constitution.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 9,784

United_States     Virginia

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disillusioned_1 View Post
He's not changing the law, he's creating a new law to fill in the seat in the interim. The law for his state says that a special election needs to be held to replace a vacant senate seat - and its not a great deal of time before the election must be held, but it is a couple of months, which makes sense from the viewpoint that if a senator dies suddenly it will take time to organize and campaign to get elected. That law would still be there. All he would like is that the governor be able to appoint a replacement to stand in until the election.



goes to show te existing law was a shitty one
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
California Girl's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
My bite is worst than my bark

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Where there is trouble, I am there!
Posts: 3,336

United_States     California

Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dblack View Post
Awesome. I think that's covered by the "in your face" clause of the Constitution.
Since the DNC have forgotten that we actually have a Constitution, many of us are not suprised by their idiotic behavior. Disappointed, yes. Surprised, no.
__________________


Great Quotes from Great Americans:

"With regard to the words 'general welfare', I have always regarded them as qualified by the details of the powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphisis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."James Madison, Father of the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 25,738

United_States    
Re: Ted Kennedy wants to revoke a law he had passed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dblack View Post
Awesome. I think that's covered by the "in your face" clause of the Constitution.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Bis interimitur qui suis armis perit...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online