Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net
Reading without reflecting is like eating without digesting.
Edmund Burke
Eisenhower's infrastructure spending was classical Keynesian, which served as the economic model during the later part of the Great Depression, World War II, and the post-war economic expansion.
Don't think Eisenhower and his advisers bought into Keynes?
Life Magazine article from 1954 where President Eisenhower’s top economists discussed their plans for a slowing economy. Here’s how they were thinking about dealing with it:
Anti-depression planning by the Administration includes plenty of stop-gap measures just in case the experts prove wrong and the expected moderate decline turns into full-scale recession. On the shelf are $15 billion of public-works projects [that’s about $100bn today] already blueprinted and approved by Congress, which can quickly be set in motion. Plans have been made to speed up state and local public-works projects, if need be by buying up their bond issues. The “tight money” policy, which has already been liberalized, would quickly be switched to fast expansion of credit by decreasing Federal Reserve margins, resuming the price-pegging of government bonds, and stimulating installment buying. Taxes would be cut still more, the building industry would get special inducements to expand. The republicans say they will spend money faster than the New Deal if they have to.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith







That's badly wrong. It's true that the Republican Party is more ideologically narrow than it was, but the tent is just as big. Parties are as ideological as they can get away with. A conservative candidate in 1964 got crushed. A more conservative candidate in 2012 has a good chance. Democrats are the big tent now because they have to be. Liberalism is where conservatism was in 1964.







More conservative. The 1950s version of the party had more moderates. It's not bad to be more ideologically narrow. The Republicans still win elections. Actually, they win more than they did back then.
A lot of Goldwater conservatives disagree. The GOP was hijacked by theocrats and neocons in 1980, Ronbo opened the gates of the party to radicals like himself.
Invasion of the Party Snatchers
By Victor Gold
After four decades as a Republican insider, Victor Gold reveals how the holy-rollers and the Neo-Cons have destroyed the GOP. Now he's fighting to get his party back.
As a man who served as press aide to Barry Goldwater and speechwriter and senior advisor to George H. W. Bush (in addition to co-authoring his autobiography), Victor Gold is absolutely furious that the Neo-Cons and their strange bedfellows, the Evangelical Right, have stolen his party from him. Now he is bringing the fight to them.
Invasion of the Party Snatchers is a blistering critique not only of the Bush-Cheney administration but also of the Republican Congress. Gold is ready to tell all about the war being waged for the soul of the GOP, including the elder Bush's opinion of his sons work domestically and abroad, the significance of the newly elected Congress, and how Goldwater would have reacted to it all. Gold reveals, among other explosive disclosures, how George W. has been manipulated by his vice president and secretary of defense to become, in Lenin's famous phrase, a "useful idiot" for Neo-Conservative warmongers and Theo-Conservative religious fanatics.
Although there have been other books by dissident Republicans attacking the Bush-Cheney administrations betrayal of conservative principles, none have been by an insider whose political credentials include inner-circle status with Barry Goldwater and George H. W. Bush.
Review:
"Make no mistake: author Gold, a former speechwriter for George H.W. Bush and aide to Barry Goldwater, is one disgusted Republican. The GOP of the 2006 midterm election, he writes, is 'a party of pork-barrel ear-markers like Dennis Hastert, of political hatchet men like Karl Rove, and of Bible-thumping hypocrites like Tom Delay.' Gold looks to Goldwater, 'a straight-talking, freethinking maverick,' as the yardstick by which to measure just how far the party of Lincoln has fallen.
He traces the beginning of the end to the 1980 Republican National Convention and the presence of 'a militant new element...personified by Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell.' The other half of the equation, the neoconservatives, are embodied by Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, 'two cuts from the same Machiavellian cloth.' In efficient prose, Gold scrutinizes a significant swath of recent GOP history, in particular Newt Gingrich's 104th Congress and the Bush II White House, without losing momentum.
He also has choice words for 'the Coulterization of Republican rhetoric,' the revolving door between Capitol Hill and K Street, and 'sideshow' legislation like the Flag Protection Amendment. Gold sees a promising future for the Republican Party, but not until they lose some major elections and are able to keep down a slice of humble pie; for those disillusioned with the state of the GOP, this quick, uncompromising polemic provides substantial support, along with a large dose of cold comfort." Publishers Weekly (Starred Review) (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.)
Synopsis:
The last real Goldwater conservative in America attacks the current state of his movement and his party.
Powell's Books - Invasion of the Party Snatchers: How the Holy-Rollers and Neo-Cons Destroyed the GOP by Victor Gold
Victor Gold grew up in New Orleans, Louisiana, where he attended the public schools, and Tulane University. After working as a reporter-correspondent for the BIRMINGHAM (Alabama) NEWS, he earned his law degree (J.D.) from the University of Alabama. He served in the U.S. Army during the Korean War, 1950-52.
In 1958 he moved to Washington, D.C., and joined the public relations firm of Selvage & Lee. Six years later he became Deputy Press Secretary to Senator Barry Goldwater during the 1964 presidential campaign.
In 1965 Gold opened his own political public relations firm in Washington, listing among his clients then-Republican House leader Gerald Ford and Senator Bob Dole. At the Republican conventions of 1968 and 1976 he worked with press secretary Lyn Nofziger on behalf of the presidential candidacy of then-California Governor Ronald Reagan. During the Nixon administration he served as press secretary to Vice President Spiro T. Agnew until January, 1973.
In 1980 Gold joined the staff of Republican presidential candidate George H. W. Bush as a speechwriter and senior advisor, a position he held during the Reagan-Bush campaigns of '80 and '84. He served on the Bush vice-presidential staff in 1981, and as a Bush advisor in the campaigns of 1988 and 1992. In 1992 he received the Distinguished Achievement Award for Political Communication from his alma mater, the University of Alabama.
In 1989 Gold served as a member of President Bush's election-oversight delegation to the first free Romanian elections.
A frequent speaker on the national political and campus circuits, Gold has also appeared on numerous network television shows. His articles, covering politics and sports, have appeared in NEWSWEEK, HARPER'S, ATLANTIC MONTHLY, PLAYBOY, CONNOISSEUR, READERS' DIGEST, NATIONAL REVIEW, THE WEEKLY STANDARD, NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW YORK TIMES, THE LOS ANGELES TIMES, and THE WASHINGTON POST.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
John Kenneth Galbraith





And that is why the democrats controlled congress for over 40 yrs. You liked the Republican party then, they stayed out of the way. But it was the Contract with American spear headed by Newt that changed all that. And that is when you went belletristic, and have been pouting ever sense, because you did not get your way.
Yep...full of a bunch of fraudulent signatures. My sister, and her family, live in Wisconsin. I went and visited them for Christmas. I was talking with my 13 year old niece and she told me that some lady asked her to sign the recall. She told the lady that she was only 13 and the lady didn't care and asked for the signature, regardless. This is not a surprise.
I also find it pretty stupid of those people since Walker took a multi-billion dollar budget deficit and now it's balance. I guess stupid libs simply looooooove being in debt.
Last edited by fishjoel; 01-21-2012 at 10:58 AM.
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)
Yeah....what preceded the crash of 29 was the passing of the 16th amendment and the creation of the Federal Reserve. Btw....Michigan has been dominated by liberals for decades upon decades. They are also one of the biggest union states (I know you have a hardon for unions). Why do all the things you love produce such shitty results?
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)




It doesn't matter if there are 1 million signatures. That means that there are more signatures than necessary to activate a recall. And it also is a small minority of the number of people who are required to defeat Walker. This is about as relevant as when unions and liberal groups spent about $350 million in a failed attempt to recall Republican state Congressmen. There's a lot of breathless reporting and front-page splash headlines and then it's all for nothing (for liberals, that is, lol).
To fishjoel: it's not that liberals love being in debt. It's that it doesn't matter to them. Liberals are irresponsible by definition. They don't care how their policies affect their kids. Take a look at Social Security. It is wholly irrelevant to them that the plan is unsustainable. What matters is that it is here right now for them. Their politicians don't care about Obamacare -- all that matters is that they can tell some ignorant people "I got you free healthcare." They'll get elected and after those people are dead and their kids are cursing them and urinating on their graves for what they did to them, someone will pay the price -- probably some responsible Republican who is saying that they have to reform the system. That's how it works. Conservatism is for the adults, liberalism is for the children and the retards.
As for Blue Doggy's assertion that the Republican party used to be an umbrella party, that's a lame talking point. Half the time, liberals like to say that the Republican party of old used to be just old rich rednecks from the South in the KKK -- who were actually Democrats, by the way -- and the other half of the time they try to pretend that we need to "go back to" the "old" party where we were an umbrella. It's a pathetically transparent attempt at psychology. You go "I used to like Republicans, when they were open-minded. If only they could go back to being that way, I'd support them again." LOL. What are we, in high school that you think that will work?
Yeah crazy horrible things have been happening...
The state balanced it's budget w/o massive cuts of people or programs
The local counties and cities... the same.
The school districts... not only balanced their budgets but had money to hire more teachers
{sarcasm} Horrible... no wonder people are rising up... .{/sarcasm}
Question for you libs. Could you point out something bad that has resulted in Walker's policies? Not some ideological BS, I mean hard facts (eg. budget increased, teachers lost jobs/got pay cuts). SOMETHING?
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)
Bookmarks