Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Popular Crime Stories and Trials

Popular Crime Stories and Trials A forum to discuss high profile crime stories and trials, media circus trials, etc

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007
Pogo's Avatar
Pogo Pogo is offline
Feel the compassion?
Want some gov't pie?

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 6,491

Earth     United_States

Re: Mumia Abu Jamal back in court

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Did you read her post correctly?
I noticed that but the text she quoted gave the impression that ballistic tests had been done:

Quote:
Official ballistics tests done on the fatal bullet verify that Officer Faulkner was killed by a .38 caliber bullet.
It'd be rather unusual for no ballistics testing to have been conducted.
__________________
Who does vote for these dishonest shitheads? Who among us can be happy and proud of having all this innocent blood on our hands? Who are these swine? These flag-sucking half-wits who get fleeced and fooled by stupid little rich kids like George Bush?

--Hunter S. Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007
Crystal's Avatar
Crystal Crystal is offline
Administrator
The cake is a lie.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: a lake in Texas
Posts: 7,427
Blog Entries: 1

United_States     Texas

Re: Mumia Abu Jamal back in court

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
I noticed that but the text she quoted gave the impression that ballistic tests had been done:


It'd be rather unusual for no ballistics testing to have been conducted.
I think they did ballistics tests on Faulkner's gun to conclude he shot Mumia, but they did not do ballistics tests on Mumia's gun to see if it was the gun that shot Faulkner.
__________________
New to the forum? Check out our Newbie's Guide!
Interested in supporting USPO? Click here!



Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 5,382

United_States     Connecticut

Re: Mumia Abu Jamal back in court

From what I've read of the case years back, the Daniel Faulkner website posted earlier and the Free Mumia sites tell completely different and contradictory pieces of evidence.

I, however, find the claims I read from a few sources that a man shot in the lung was "screaming" a confession somewhat suspect.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2007
Crystal's Avatar
Crystal Crystal is offline
Administrator
The cake is a lie.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: a lake in Texas
Posts: 7,427
Blog Entries: 1

United_States     Texas

Re: Mumia Abu Jamal back in court

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thematic-Device View Post
From what I've read of the case years back, the Daniel Faulkner website posted earlier and the Free Mumia sites tell completely different and contradictory pieces of evidence.

I, however, find the claims I read from a few sources that a man shot in the lung was "screaming" a confession somewhat suspect.
The Mumia supporters insist it was a .44 that killed Faulkner, but the defense's own ballistic's expert said that it was a .38 that killed Faulkner. The .44 misinformation comes from a medical examiner's quick assessment and NOT a ballisitc expert. The medical examiner said he wasn't a ballistics expert and said .44 was his best guess at the time.

Does anyone know one way or the other if Mumia represented himself or he attempted to but then the judge appointed an attorney because of disruptions or something like that. I had read that he couldn't get the representation he wanted (a guy who wasn't even a lawyer and you can't have that for capital offenses in PA) so he opted to represent himself - "a man who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client." Which brings about another question, perhaps for another thread - If a person chooses to represent themselves can they then complain about thier lack of representation when they don't like the verdict? Do they have any right to complain about their trial and demand a new one?
__________________
New to the forum? Check out our Newbie's Guide!
Interested in supporting USPO? Click here!




Last edited by Crystal; 06-12-2007 at 09:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online