Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Popular Crime Stories and Trials

Popular Crime Stories and Trials A forum to discuss high profile crime stories and trials, media circus trials, etc

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2007
agoodfella's Avatar
agoodfella agoodfella is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: comfortably numb
Posts: 1,329

United_States    
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

ethics / morality aside, Vick broke the law (should it be proved in court that he knowingly engaged in dog fighting -- and with all of the defendants turning state's evidence -- it sure looks like an airtight case -- the Feds, that's the big boys, he is up against have IIRC something like a 97% conviction rate)...

so when he broke the law, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law -- and Roger Goodel should kick his sorry ass out of the NFL when that happens (based on the new "good behavior" / "harming the NFL reputation" policy that has been recently implemented). the fact that he is a total scumbag is irrelevant.

Vick's NFL career is on life support and the sooner he gets kicked out the better. Total low-life.
__________________
.


Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 08-17-2007
DGG's Avatar
DGG DGG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,820

Sweden    
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
Well, since animals don't kill one another for fun (i.e. 'cruelty' - though if you've ever watched a predator rip its prey apart, that certainly seems 'cruel'), your idea of animal "rights" seems only to be concerned with the unique restriction of what humans can do. That is to say, your point doesn't seem to be "animals are entitled to..." but rather, "humans may not..." After all, good luck explaining to a badger that he has no 'right' to eviscerate a baby rabbit.
Well, rights is a human invention. Humans define rights, humans grant rights. Humans grant some animals rights not to be treated in a cruel way by other humans. That is what I mean by rights.

Then there are also some things resembling rights in the social interaction of some animals. Animals who live in a pack have some general rules that you can call rights and duties vis-a-vis one another.
__________________
President Josiah Bartlet: Sweden has a 100% literacy rate. 100%! How do they do that?
Leo McGarry: Maybe they don't and they can't add.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2007
Miranda's Avatar
Miranda Miranda is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 12,061

United_States     North_Carolina

Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

They are currently saying he has agreed to plea and is accepting full responsibility. Just breaking, so I don't know how correct it is..

Quote:
RICHMOND, Va. - Prosecutors have offered Michael Vick a plea deal that would recommend he be imprisoned for 18-36 months in the federal dogfighting case, two sources told CNN on Monday.

The sources also told CNN that Vick's attorneys are trying to have the sentencing guidelines reduced to less than a year.

U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson, who is presiding over the case, said he has the leeway to sentence Vick and his co-defendants as he deems fit and is not bound by the recommended sentences given to him by the prosecution, USA Today said.

CNN also said that Vick's attorneys are hoping to hear from NFL commissioner Roger Goodell on Monday about what options would be available to the Atlanta Falcons star quarterback if he does accept a plea deal.

Hudson said Monday he had heard nothing about Vick's decision to accept or reject the plea deal, WSB-TV in Atlanta reported Monday.

Hudson also denied that he had cleared Monday's docket to make room for a possible Vick hearing and that, even if he were to hear of an agreement between Vick and prosecutors in the next few days, he wouldn't be able to schedule the plea agreement hearing until next week, WSB-TV reported.
Vick reportedly reaches plea agreement - NFL - MSNBC.com
Aside from all of that, the man is looking at prison time. I'd be a bit more worried about that, than whether or not he will be playing football.


At the end of a day, only 3 words..what a waste.
__________________
MESMERISM, n. Hypnotism before it wore good clothes, kept a carriage and asked Incredulity to dinner. - Ambrose Bierce
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2007
wrxsti wrxsti is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Blue State
Posts: 1,169

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Maybe Vick can get on some sort of work release program; he only needs Sundays and an occasional Monday off. Practice can be moved to the correctional facility.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,076

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Looks like the scumbag has agreed to plead guilty.

I hope the NFL's gambling rules results in a lifetime ban on that piece of shit...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,557

United_States     Texas

Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxsti View Post
Maybe Vick can get on some sort of work release program; he only needs Sundays and an occasional Monday off. Practice can be moved to the correctional facility.
What a deal that would be! Also he could get say a year in and then another year's probation if he got lucky but it all boils down to whether the NFL will let him play, i very much doubt they would if he were in jail at the time!

I think its gonna go one way or another; he either plays again in 2 years or so or he never picks up a football again as an NFL quarterback. If that's the case he may well go onto Arena or something like that.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,333

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Michael Vick puts the fannies in the seats, he's out of the NFL for one year, two years tops. That's enough to make the point, and still cash the ticket.
The good thing for Vick, is that prison and offtime only delay his career, he will still play the same number of years, because the wear and tear on his body will be next to nothing in prison, compared to the NFL.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,076

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Michael Vick puts the fannies in the seats, he's out of the NFL for one year, two years tops. That's enough to make the point, and still cash the ticket.
Perhaps not.

I've heard more than a few people talking about the fact that, since this was "gambling", it could be enough to win him a lifetime ban from the NFL...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,557

United_States     Texas

Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
Michael Vick puts the fannies in the seats,
Which precisely no NFL GM is gonna wanna touch him with a barge pole, think of how many fans who are animal lovers or have their own pets would be angry, it would certainly drive more than a few fans away.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
wrxsti wrxsti is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Blue State
Posts: 1,169

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

I think the plea deal is the first step in an appearance of contrition. After a year or two out, Vick will be healed, and appear with Betty White on a doggie commercial or two. Give the Eagles a few years of of losing seaons, his fans will forgive him, and everything will be dismissed as a youthful indescretion. Remember, we are not dealing with the average schmo here, the guy has talent in a moneymaking operation, and the powers that be will want him back. Normal rules do not apply.

The gambling thing could be a problem, I wouldn't be surprised to see this issue fade.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,557

United_States     Texas

Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

I think the minute he takes a plea the NFL is put in that nightmare scenario of what to do with him. They then have the option to give him the boot but will they? Because as a QB he focuses more on his physical ability (agility, speed and so on) rather than his throwing i think it makes it more difficult for him as his health is more important an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

I found this to be a pretty interesting take on the matter. I'm not sure if you need a subscription/account to view Morrisey in the Trib, so here are a few excerpts if you can't view it:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports...hi_sports_util

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Morrisey (Trib sports writer)
But the convulsive reaction to the Vick case has made it obvious we've lost our sense of proportion.

Dogs are defenseless, and we humans are quick to protect the defenseless. It is one of our better qualities.

But a woman in the hands of a 230-pound elite athlete is more or less defenseless, too, and I can't remember any case of domestic abuse, sexual assault or murder involving an NFL player that sparked this kind of public outrage.

...

It's hard to get rid of the image of dogs being drowned or electrocuted or beaten to death. Whether Vick was personally involved in those activities or not doesn't really matter. He is going to plead guilty to charges involving a dogfighting operation apparently run out of one of his properties. Whether his hands were actually around a dog's neck is beside the point. His fingerprints are all over this case.

But if an NFL player beats the hell out of his wife or girlfriend these days, it's greeted with a practiced shrug. It happens so often, we're almost numb to it.

....

In the mid-1990s, Nebraska star Lawrence Phillips pleaded no contest to trespassing and assault after allegedly beating his girlfriend, who said he dragged her by her hair down three flights of stairs. It was the beginning of a long stretch of criminal trouble involving Phillips. This did not stop the Rams from making him a first-round draft pick, nor did it stop the Dolphins and the 49ers from giving him chance after chance to carry the football again.

Abuse your dog, and people howl. Smack around your girlfriend or face charges of sexually assaulting a woman and people shake their heads and roll their eyes. And they'll eventually cheer you again. If you don't believe that, pay attention the next time Kobe Bryant rolls through town.

The public reaction to Bryant's troubles—he reached a settlement with a woman he was charged with sexually assaulting—wasn't nearly as loud and angry as the reaction to Vick.

...

Let's be clear: It's not that the response to Vick's alleged crimes is overboard; it's that the response to athletes' crimes against women is underwhelming. We might want to ask ourselves why that is.

A little perspective, please—especially the next time a player attacks a woman. Another incident should be happening any day now.
I don't really have a whole lot to say on the article itself, I just found it interesting to read, in the wake of all this media hype surrounding this particular case. And it is certainly true that athletes accused of and convicted of actual crimes against people have gotten far less revulsion and outrage directed at them.

I wonder why that is...
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
Miranda's Avatar
Miranda Miranda is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 12,061

United_States     North_Carolina

Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

Quote:
But a woman in the hands of a 230-pound elite athlete is more or less defenseless, too, and I can't remember any case of domestic abuse, sexual assault or murder involving an NFL player that sparked this kind of public outrage.

Ray Carruth - but that could have just been in NC. I could also say OJ, but that would be former NFL, of course.
...
Quote:
It's hard to get rid of the image of dogs being drowned or electrocuted or beaten to death. Whether Vick was personally involved in those activities or not doesn't really matter. He is going to plead guilty to charges involving a dogfighting operation apparently run out of one of his properties. Whether his hands were actually around a dog's neck is beside the point. His fingerprints are all over this case.

But if an NFL player beats the hell out of his wife or girlfriend these days, it's greeted with a practiced shrug. It happens so often, we're almost numb to it.
He said a mouthful. I agree, and I'm afraid (IMO) its just acceptable - all over sports, from football to baseball, etc.

Beat your wife, get charged, bad PR, "I'm sorry", take anger management, and we're done. Of course thats a simplified version, but perhaps its easier to forgive someone for "losing their temper"? I think Goodell has an opportunity here to turn things around - He's handled things in the off season rather well - Jones is suspended (but off making records) - I'm not too sure about Johnson, was that all the Bears?





As far as Vick...I've been watching ESPN most of the morning while doing things around the house. They have been playing audio of people defending Vick - here's whats grating on my nerves..
Now that he is pleading guilty, there is no more wait and see defense, now those people are arguing the merits of dogfighting (I believe I heard Stephon Marbury say that dogfighting was just a sport...with dogs..)

Someone else was yelling that he has kids and a Mom. This is where the argument is getting lost on me. Grasping at straws now.. "But, But, But!!!"

No "buts" - he broke the rules - dog fighting, racketeering, etc. He broke the rules, he lied and he got caught. Just because people can't argue the wait and see line anymore, doesn't mean they should keep excusing him. Something tells me people excusing him helped him to where he is now, as it does others who do the same thing.
What he did shouldn't be excused, neither should domestic battery, neither should murder, and the list goes on. I can't feel sorry for him, nor do I feel he is getting steamrolled. The man had a 100 million dollar contract, along with endorsements - he knew the rules and he didn't care.
Piss on it - there are other people out there with loads of talent, who would kill to be where he is, and hopefully not shit on it because they think they can. He let his team down, he let his fans down. I'll feel sorry for them, but the only reason Vick is where he is, is because he put himself there.


*I am not directing this argument at you, I'm just talking.
__________________
MESMERISM, n. Hypnotism before it wore good clothes, kept a carriage and asked Incredulity to dinner. - Ambrose Bierce
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,638

United_States    
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

I think Vick, partially got the shaft. Vick is a victim of his own upbringing “to an extent”..I have been to bull fights…my only objection is, even if the bull does well (take a chunk out of the matadors ass etc.), they scramble his brains anyway….they should let him live…Anyway, Vick came from a semi rural upbringing, sports like this have been extent in his neck of the woods for centuries…..so, it’s a learned accommodation…IF he did torture these animals that were eventually put to death for fighting poorly etc. that shows a meanness of character that doesn’t take dog fighting to bring out or put on display. And for that he should get time.

As fr the charge of fighting dogs? No, I don’t think so. No more than a guy first offender cock fighting should go to jail either…

I suspect we will never know, but can take his plea as perhaps a non coenfession….I suspect, he took the plea because his lawyer might have told him:" hey you’ll skate jail time on just dog fighting, BUT if anyone testifies with sppt. , they saw you mistreating the dogs outside of just throwing them in the ring, you’re toast", and there ya go.

BUT, lets be honest here, he was treated as if he was guilty as soon as the news hit the airwaves, and folks, his being guilty to what he did cop in the plea, is not an excuse. I was super pissed when those guys from Duke got the shaft from the media, their professors etc. and I am pissed here…his plea to some type of culpability means squat regards his being suspended from football and hung out to dry before a trail, or the eventual settlement of the case which is a plea bargain.
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007
ZakattackSJ ZakattackSJ is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: University of Washington-Tacoma!
Posts: 7

   
Re: Vick's dog fighting problems

So Vick is a victim because of his own upbringing? Because he came from a semi-rural place, he therefore did not know that maybe this dog fighting ring was a bad idea? That's like me saying, "Well Judge, the reason why I shot those people is because of my upbringing. I grew up playing violent X-box games all my life, so this has always been in my neck of the woods. It's a learned accommodation, Judge, the A button on the controller."
__________________
Diversity: The exclusion of White people.

Equality: The act of putting minorities first.

Bigot/Racist: A person winning an argument against a Liberal

Tolerance: Respecting Muslims, while bashing Christians.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online