Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Popular Crime Stories and Trials

Popular Crime Stories and Trials A forum to discuss high profile crime stories and trials, media circus trials, etc

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007
Frank Frank is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: North of Hell, South of heaven.
Posts: 8,287

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
It's an bservation drawn from the totality of your posts...
Translation: Strawman

Quote:
That's right. "Special" would suggest that there are spare few of us. The reality is that the vast majority of good Americans know that what you espouse is horseshit...
Fallacy: Appeal to popularity. The popularity of an idea does not make it correct or beneficial.

Quote:
I'll start by saying that an illegal immigrant is anyone, of any race, who enters this country illegally.

Now would be when you say it's only about Mexicans.
Are not the vast majority of the illegals from this nation? Or do you have millions of illegals from Germany or France that I am not aware of?

Quote:
Illegal immigration isn't a race issue, despite how much you and your cretin friends say it is. It's a law enforcement issue.
So Meztiso's are not the majority of those flooding into America? There are also millions of illegal Ukrainians and Poles flooding into your nation in similar numbers?

Quote:
Of course, it's hard for you to belch up your verbal diarreah without talking about race so, please, continue...
Translation: No intelligent response from Steve.

Quote:
"Fight the good fight"?

Huh.

Your kids will still be dead. I'm sure they'll appreciate how you "feel"...
The difference is I actually care about the future of my children which is why I reject your diversity. It is the social engineering of the diversity-monger that introduced HIV into our lands for example...

AIDS virus invaded U.S. from Haiti: study | Reuters

Thank you for that gift diversity-mongers...

Quote:
Sorry, but when someone suggests that I should beat the shit out of a freind, simply because he's black (as Brett did), I don't see the potential for a debate of substantive facts. Given that you and Brett are exactly alike, I have no reason to believe that such a debate is possible with you.
Fallacy: Guilt by association! Just because you decide that Brett and I are alike does not mean that I endorse every one of his positions.

Quote:
The laguage I use is the language I use.

Fuckin' deal with it.

If you're unable to do that, I would direct you to the handy "Ignore" feature available here.

I don't fucking care...
If you want to behave like a child so be it; you certainly cannot out-debate me so I suppose you have to compensate in some manner.

Quote:
Me?

A bully?

This from someone who sees nothing wrong with beating blacks because they're blacks, and who hangs out on racist web forums?

Fuckin' please...
Fallacy: Strawman! I never said it was acceptable to beat anyone because of their race.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,084

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank View Post
Are not the vast majority of the illegals from this nation? Or do you have millions of illegals from Germany or France that I am not aware of?
Before I respond, is it your position that the illegal immigration problem is a Mexican problem?

Quote:
Just because you decide that Brett and I are alike does not mean that I endorse every one of his positions.
You've provided no evidence to suggest otherwise...

Quote:
If you want to behave like a child so be it; you certainly cannot out-debate me so I suppose you have to compensate in some manner.
I've found that debating racists is remarkably easy, as they tend to be astonishingly simplistic in their views...

Quote:
I never said it was acceptable to beat anyone because of their race.
Okay.

My friend, who's black, was attacked, from behind, by a white guy swinging a beer bottle. The white guy got the shit kicked out of him. Where I come from, when someone attacks your friends, you defend them.

Brett suggested that I, too, should've attacked my friend, solely on the basis of the fact that he's black, to "even the playing field".

Would you condemn or support such an action on my part?

Do you condemn or support my decision to defend my friend?
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2007
Frank Frank is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: North of Hell, South of heaven.
Posts: 8,287

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Before I respond, is it your position that the illegal immigration problem is a Mexican problem?
It is an American problem with most of the illegals coming from Mexico.

Quote:
You've provided no evidence to suggest otherwise...
Fallacy: Shifting the burden of proof

Quote:
I've found that debating racists is remarkably easy, as they tend to be astonishingly simplistic in their views...
You certainly are simplistic in your views and you have espoused racism ad nauseum on this forum

Quote:
My friend, who's black, was attacked, from behind, by a white guy swinging a beer bottle. The white guy got the shit kicked out of him. Where I come from, when someone attacks your friends, you defend them.

Brett suggested that I, too, should've attacked my friend, solely on the basis of the fact that he's black, to "even the playing field".

Would you condemn or support such an action on my part?

Do you condemn or support my decision to defend my friend?
If you used excessive force in defending your friend; you should have been arrested but if you took lawful measures to defend someone from an assault I will not condemn you for it.

Of course I have no reason to believe this story but I would not condemn you for using lawful force to stop an assault regardless of the race of the people involved.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007
chathamfarmer chathamfarmer is offline
County Council Member

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: chatham county nc
Posts: 297

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

The child molestor gets a harsher sentence than a non-violent thief, duh.
What's the point of the question?
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,084

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank View Post
It is an American problem with most of the illegals coming from Mexico.
You do realize that a very large number of illegals entering across the US/Mexican border aren't Mexican, right?

Quote:
You certainly are simplistic in your views and you have espoused racism ad nauseum on this forum
"Ad nauseum"?

Hardly...

Quote:
If you used excessive force in defending your friend; you should have been arrested but if you took lawful measures to defend someone from an assault I will not condemn you for it.
Well, the cops didn't seem to believe it was excessive force.

I, however, believe that excessive force is often the way to go. It ensures a quick ending...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007
Frank Frank is offline
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: North of Hell, South of heaven.
Posts: 8,287

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
You do realize that a very large number of illegals entering across the US/Mexican border aren't Mexican, right?
I said 'most' of the illegal migrants come from Mexico; am I mistaken?
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,084

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank View Post
I said 'most' of the illegal migrants come from Mexico; am I mistaken?
Possibly.

I'm not employed by the US Immigration Service or the Border Patrol, so I don't know that information. It wouldn't surprise me if that wasn't the case though, and more come through Mexico from places south...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2007
FrankII FrankII is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: AZ.
Posts: 24

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
I asked this question in two different threads, and it wasn't answered. Given the nature of a forum like this, though, I suppose it's possible that it slipped by without it being seen by those to whom it was directed.

The scenario:

Two people have been convicted of crimes.

The first is a 50 year old white male. He has a steady job and pays his taxes, and has had only minor indescretions (speeding tickets, jaywalking, etc) with the law in his past. This time, however, we was convicted of the kidnapping and rape of a nine year old child. The child survived, but was so damaged that she will never be able to bear children.

The second is a 50 year old black man. He has a steady job and pays his taxes, and has had only minor indescretions (speeding tickets, jaywalking, etc) with the law in his past. This time, however, he was convicted of burglary. The total loss to the victim was less than $1,000.00.

You have sole discretion to award one of two sentences to the convicted criminals. One sentence is life in prison without the possibility of parole. The other is 250 hours community service and 12 months probation.

The question:

Which criminal gets which sentence, and why?

The answer is simple: now that slavery [in the U.S.] is over, why are Blacks still in America in the first place? America's founders created a White republic. They didn't want a multicultural democracy:

Proof: Our Founders Wanted a White America

In fact, good ol' Abe Lincoln wanted to ship the Blacks out of America to other countries, but that plan failed, so he had to play the role of the "great emancipator" as a second choice:

The Great Emancipator Abraham Lincoln and the Issue of Race


Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,084

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankII View Post
The answer is simple: now that slavery [in the U.S.] is over, why are Blacks still in America in the first place? America's founders created a White republic. They didn't want a multicultural democracy:

Proof: Our Founders Wanted a White America

In fact, good ol' Abe Lincoln wanted to ship the Blacks out of America to other countries, but that plan failed, so he had to play the role of the "great emancipator" as a second choice:

The Great Emancipator Abraham Lincoln and the Issue of Race
If the answer is so simple, why didn't you answer the question?

Which one gets which sentence?
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,294

United_States     Texas

Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

This "what if" game is so incredibly fun!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007
FrankII FrankII is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: AZ.
Posts: 24

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
If the answer is so simple, why didn't you answer the question?

Which one gets which sentence?

You know very well what I mean. If you don't, that's your problem, not mine. America is a White country, according to the 1790 citizenship law. The Black criminal-in-question should be in Africa, not in America.


Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,084

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankII View Post
You know very well what I mean. If you don't, that's your problem, not mine. America is a White country, according to the 1790 citizenship law. The Black criminal-in-question should be in Africa, not in America.
Shoulda', coulda', woulda'.

You're dodging.

Try to deal with actual reality, and answer the question.
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"

Last edited by Malvolio; 12-04-2007 at 07:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2007
Dr Longhair's Avatar
Dr Longhair Dr Longhair is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 22

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

I don't mean to get in between you guys as you seem to be having so much fun, but I wrote something the other day in another thread about the illegal immigration issue and it has yet to be responded to, so I figured I'd repost it here since it applies:

I find it very interesting when people vehemently deny any illegal immigrant's right to work in this country. In fact, many towns that have enacted laws punishing businesses for hiring illegal immigrants are now repealing them after watching their economies crumble. The fact is, America's economy depends on cheap, uneducated labor.

Fear of people who are different has always been prevalent in American society. We often forget about the "Know-Nothing" party, also called The Native American Party, which is ironic considering that all of its members were white. Anyhow, this party was formed basically in reaction to fears of the masses of Irish immigrants, who were on the whole illiterate, poor, and uneducated. The main points of their platform?

* Severe limits on immigration, especially from Catholic countries
* Restricting political office to native-born Americans
* Mandating a wait of 21 years before an immigrant could gain citizenship
* Restricting public school teachers to Protestants
* Mandating daily Bible readings in public schools (from the Protestant version of the Bible)
* Restricting the sale of liquor

Sound like a crazy party with no real support? The "Know-nothings" won leadership in Boston, Salem, and Philadelphia, and then went on to carry the entire State of Massachusetts in 1854. However, we forget about this, because eventually Irish people assimilated, and thanks to that good 'ol Catholic libido, damn near every white guy in America is part Irish (myself included).

And yet we repeat the same mistakes with Hispanic immigrants. We color them as thieves, suckling greedily at the giving teat of the benevolent Lady Liberty. The facts, however, paint a different picture. Imagine, if you will, that in the early 1900's, a Latin American man named Zapata fought for and won the right for that country's citizens to own private mejidos on which to live and farm. And this was added to this country's constitution and upheld all the way until 1994, when on the first of the year, this particular part of the constitution was repealed to allow US-owned agro-business to move in and buy mass amounts of land. And the citizens, now without land they once called their own, were allowed to work the land, but at borderline unlivable wages and for a foreign master. That's Mexican history.

Yet today, we have a name for those who decide to take the chance of being killed by unsupervised, bloodthirsty border patrol agents to take on a life of secrecy and hard labor if only to improve the lives of their future children. We call them criminals and do our best to cast them out to the country they escaped. Could there be something more un-American?
__________________
"Old Man Antonio smiles 'You've learned now that in order to know and walk you have to ask questions.' He coughs and lights another cigarette and out of his mouth come these words that fall like seeds on the ground."

Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 15,084

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Longhair View Post
I don't mean to get in between you guys as you seem to be having so much fun, but I wrote something the other day in another thread about the illegal immigration issue and it has yet to be responded to, so I figured I'd repost it here since it applies:

I find it very interesting when people vehemently deny any illegal immigrant's right to work in this country. In fact, many towns that have enacted laws punishing businesses for hiring illegal immigrants are now repealing them after watching their economies crumble. The fact is, America's economy depends on cheap, uneducated labor.

Fear of people who are different has always been prevalent in American society. We often forget about the "Know-Nothing" party, also called The Native American Party, which is ironic considering that all of its members were white. Anyhow, this party was formed basically in reaction to fears of the masses of Irish immigrants, who were on the whole illiterate, poor, and uneducated. The main points of their platform?

* Severe limits on immigration, especially from Catholic countries
* Restricting political office to native-born Americans
* Mandating a wait of 21 years before an immigrant could gain citizenship
* Restricting public school teachers to Protestants
* Mandating daily Bible readings in public schools (from the Protestant version of the Bible)
* Restricting the sale of liquor

Sound like a crazy party with no real support? The "Know-nothings" won leadership in Boston, Salem, and Philadelphia, and then went on to carry the entire State of Massachusetts in 1854. However, we forget about this, because eventually Irish people assimilated, and thanks to that good 'ol Catholic libido, damn near every white guy in America is part Irish (myself included).

And yet we repeat the same mistakes with Hispanic immigrants. We color them as thieves, suckling greedily at the giving teat of the benevolent Lady Liberty. The facts, however, paint a different picture. Imagine, if you will, that in the early 1900's, a Latin American man named Zapata fought for and won the right for that country's citizens to own private mejidos on which to live and farm. And this was added to this country's constitution and upheld all the way until 1994, when on the first of the year, this particular part of the constitution was repealed to allow US-owned agro-business to move in and buy mass amounts of land. And the citizens, now without land they once called their own, were allowed to work the land, but at borderline unlivable wages and for a foreign master. That's Mexican history.

Yet today, we have a name for those who decide to take the chance of being killed by unsupervised, bloodthirsty border patrol agents to take on a life of secrecy and hard labor if only to improve the lives of their future children. We call them criminals and do our best to cast them out to the country they escaped. Could there be something more un-American?
Are you honestly wondering why nobody responded to that?
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2007
Dr Longhair's Avatar
Dr Longhair Dr Longhair is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 22

   
Re: Question For Our Learned White Supremists...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Are you honestly wondering why nobody responded to that?
Well, I suppose it shouldn't be surprising given that most Americans ignore these things in the first place. Just trying to bring a little history into the discussion of illegal immigration to give an idea as to why people are streaming across the border in the first place. I was also trying to show that people have always been afraid of immigrants, but eventually, they assimilate into the culture and become positive cogs in the American machine just as every other ethnicity. But I guess that was a bit outlandish.
__________________
"Old Man Antonio smiles 'You've learned now that in order to know and walk you have to ask questions.' He coughs and lights another cigarette and out of his mouth come these words that fall like seeds on the ground."

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes