You are a 110% correct there Miranda.......

__________________
Have a Great Day And Smile.
Laughter is the best medicine


Politicians and diapers need to be changed often and for the same reason.

Your statement is flawed on so many levels, it's actually impressive that you managed to compact it into two sentences.

- Little girls are not illegal. Illegal immigrant scumbags are.
- How does "banning" children = killing little girls?
- Who proposed killing the illegal immigrants? Nobody.
- How is it that the victims of rape are ripe for your wrath of banning/killing?
- Are you suggesting that if there were no "little girls" around, Saint Paco would have not resorted to raping, say, a 16 year old? 18? 25? 87?
- If a tree falls in the forest and there is an illegal immigrant stopped at the border as he should be, would he be able to pick grapefruit off it or rape little girls in the U.S.? No and no.
- How do you "clearly" arrive at anything based upon your nonsense?

__________________

"Compassionate Conservatism"?!?! That is a stupid phrase. Conservatism is inherently compassionate. It is liberalism that is cruel for the sake of maintaining a constituency.

I never said they were.Well, if they are illegal, one solution to enforcing that law would be to eliminate existing kids while preventing new ones.The proposition was to enforce immigration laws to stop rape. The two do not have a direct relationship, so bitching about immigration laws when a rape is committed by immigrants is silly. A more straight-forward approach would be to criminalize rape and enforce that law. To point out the absurdity of his suggestion, I posted an equally absurd one. Instead of simply enforcing anti-rape laws, let's simply ban little girls (using the logic that "if they weren't there, it would not have happened"). Understand now?I don't think you understand what sarcasm/tongue in cheek means.Not at all. In fact, the same logic is behind my argument: that the solution is not to enforce vaguely related laws, but to enforce the actual laws related to the act. I even pointed this out in an earlier bank robbery/speeding example. You should take the time to read some of the posts so that your own posts do not suggest that you have no clue what is going on.

__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.

thank god

mccain
hillary
obama

are all open boarder supporters, and pro ammunisty...

fuck american soverenty.


oddly enough the CFR is pro open boarder and pro ammunisty... and all 3 candidates are members of the CFR.... im not acusing them of conspiring...im just saying.... those are all actual facts... as to weather or not they are pushing the CFR's agenda... i wouldnt know....

Dude, that was fuckin' brilliant!

Heh, yeah Slon's good at that. A load of garbage in what he posts but at least its compact...

But at times you can't blame him, he spends most his time replying to Steve...so you know, fight fire with fire and all....