So I presume you are opposed to categorizing people's behavior based on status of their facial hair?

Well I am opposed to categorizing people's behavior on the basis of their immigration status.

__________________
Terrornoia: how the propa-ugandists used the omni-territorialization of terror for the fundamen-talismanization of criminal law in a multi-cultus-ritualistic society

No, I'm opposed to giving consideration for anything you might have to say, primarily because when you have nothing to work with, you put words in people's mouths...

What words did I put in your mouth?

__________________
Terrornoia: how the propa-ugandists used the omni-territorialization of terror for the fundamen-talismanization of criminal law in a multi-cultus-ritualistic society

How about categorizing people on the basis of a proven criminal record? If Group A has a 100% crime rate while Group B has a 30% crime rate are we wrong to look more cautiously at Group A in matters related to the commissions of crime?

All illegal aliens are law breakers; 100% crime rate amongst these people on the basis they illegally entered into the United States.

The fact that I speed virtually every time I am driving a motor vehicle, or the fact that I regularly consume alcohol below the legal age limit does not make me more likely to rape a ten year old.

__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas

Why don't you just say you don't like foreigners, because you want to protect the American culture or reduce crime or something like that. I'm cool with that. I don't want illegals out of my country because they are illegal, I want them out because they are foreigners. Why not drop the "illegal" facade and make it just about immigration?

I disagree with you on a great many things.

This is not one of them...

I never said that it did but it is wrong to categorise groups when one group has as 100% crime rate in comparison to other groups who do not have such an established rate of criminal behaviour? I rarely agree with Steve but he is dead right on his points and I would add that it is not a shock that groups with a 100% crime rate will be predisposed to commit crime even a variety of crimes that may be unrelated to their original offence.

Illegal aliens have a proven disregard for American law and I see no reason why they would suddenly honour American law after they crossed the magical borderline. Maybe they will not become rapists but it would not surprise me if they did commit such acts considering their contempt for U.S. law.

I've seen no evidence of that. You already acknowledge that you have a propensity to break the law. So, I would say it does make you more likely to do it than someone who doesn't break the law.

I'm not saying the odds are all that great, but they are better...

No, they aren't better. I have a propensity to break laws regarding speed limits and consumption regulations, not raping the kiddies.

__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas

Eh... ok. Those were my words, not yours. If I wanted people to think they were yours I'd put them in a quote box.

The point I'm making is that I don't like Ahmed from Morocco who stole my bike because he is a criminal from Morocco. What does it matter that he is noted in the governement registry or not?

__________________
Terrornoia: how the propa-ugandists used the omni-territorialization of terror for the fundamen-talismanization of criminal law in a multi-cultus-ritualistic society

The odds are certainly better that a person with no regard for the law will break said laws; which law will be broken is up for debate but I would say that one with contempt for the law is more likely to commit the act of rape than one who respects the law.

It matters because if this criminal were deported as he should have been or the border secured as it should have been; the child would be alive right now.

It is one thing to have to deal with your own criminals but to impose foreign criminals on your own population when they could have been denied entry or at least removed is truly immoral...

Well many legal immigrants who commited crimes could have been denied entry as well. Isn't that just as immoral?

__________________
Terrornoia: how the propa-ugandists used the omni-territorialization of terror for the fundamen-talismanization of criminal law in a multi-cultus-ritualistic society

This coming from the guy who said twice that I think that the raping of girls is OK.


That's funny.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears