Quote:
Originally Posted by Politico
In this case, it could have been the choice between life and death. Had a wooden bat been used, the child might have survived.
|
Yeah, maybe. And maybe some guy who overdosed on Red Label would have survived had he drank Black Label. Should they put that on the bottle, too? Are we to put a warning label listing every possible scenario, butterfly effect-style? Don't be ridiculous.
Quote:
You are not saying power to the people, you are saying power to the corporations.
|
Not really. A corporation only has power if its customers buy the products. Baseball bats are hardly a necessity.
Quote:
And yes, if a corporation knowingly produces a product that kills more people than it's competition, and you defend their right to make that decision based soley upon PROFIT,
|
Actually, I defend their right based on liberty and the fact that they're not hurting anyone.
Quote:
you ARE saying "fuck the people" even worse, you are saying "Fuck the people in the name of PROFIT!".
What? Are you serious? I doubt the child was intoxicated, possibly distracted but I highly doubt he was intoxicated.
|
I didn't say he was.
Quote:
Again, if the aluminum bat is many times more likely to kill people, it shouldn't be used. A proper analogy would have been "It's like a skydiver demanding that research be performed on a parachute design to determine if in the past 20 years of use it has been found to be more or less deadly".
|
And this should be up to him. If he doesn't bother to research anything, maybe he shouldn't be skydiving. You're demanding an unreasonable amount of information to be provided despite the extremely limited marginal returns at that stage of detail. Should car manufacturers all give you a scale telling you which competitors' cars are more reliable and which are less reliable? Should they compare the gas tank capacity of the cars and tell you their has has a pint less? And that's with CAR! You want such standards for fucking steel pipes!