Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Popular Crime Stories and Trials
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Popular Crime Stories and Trials A forum to discuss high profile crime stories and trials, media circus trials, etc

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #556 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 23,785

United_States    
Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

dream on.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #557 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Porras's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Now with 20% more Irish

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,690

United_States     Wyoming

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
this muslim terrorist better end up shot and soon.
I disagree. No good would come of studying his dead body. This tragedy provides us with the opportunity to either study what makes a person snap, or find out who his connections may be within the terrorist community. Both of these would be beneficial.
__________________
During the journey we commonly forget its goal. Almost every profession is chosen as a means to an end but continued as an end in itself. Forgetting our objectives is the most frequent act of stupidity.
-Friedrich Nietzsche, The Wanderer and his Shadow

All good socialists have villas in Southern France. That's not the point.
-Eurosocialist
Reply With Quote
  #558 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Tanngrisnir3's Avatar
Vice President
Biscuits. Like bread with training wheels. For retards.

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,167

California     United_States

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzy View Post
I know because I am all-knowing in these matters.
Well now, that's odd, because you just sound like you're talking out of your ass.
Quote:

Now get back into your corner with the other sheeple and let others make the decisions.
Yep, you're unable to actually answer the questions. You're talking out of your ass.
__________________
All things serve The Beam
Reply With Quote
  #559 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 9,784

United_States     Virginia

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porras View Post
I disagree. No good would come of studying his dead body. This tragedy provides us with the opportunity to either study what makes a person snap, or find out who his connections may be within the terrorist community. Both of these would be beneficial.

What makes them "snap" ? islam.

Who ? they already know.

There is beneft in hanging his carcas on a pike to show how we feel about this sort of scum.
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #560 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Tanngrisnir3's Avatar
Vice President
Biscuits. Like bread with training wheels. For retards.

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,167

California     United_States

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzy View Post
Exactly. When a known virus is infecting a flock, eradication of the entire flock to end the threat is in order.
Should disinter the bodies of the Muslim US servicemen buried at Arlington National Cemetery as well? You know, the ones who died in the service of their country, the USA?

Hmmmm?
__________________
All things serve The Beam
Reply With Quote
  #561 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Porras's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Now with 20% more Irish

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,690

United_States     Wyoming

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
What makes them "snap" ? islam.

Who ? they already know.

There is beneft in hanging his carcas on a pike to show how we feel about this sort of scum.
Clearly there is more to it than "being a Muslim made him crazy and all Muslims are terrorists."

We have an opportunity to both study the mental health issue at play (assuming it exists) and to get the identities of every anti American person he associates with. Not just the AQ members he tried to get in contact with, but the people who fostered his views to begin with. I assure you, it wasn't one imam and it certainly wasn't the whole of the Muslim community.
__________________
During the journey we commonly forget its goal. Almost every profession is chosen as a means to an end but continued as an end in itself. Forgetting our objectives is the most frequent act of stupidity.
-Friedrich Nietzsche, The Wanderer and his Shadow

All good socialists have villas in Southern France. That's not the point.
-Eurosocialist
Reply With Quote
  #562 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Sunshine's Avatar
Vice President
So many years in one yesterday~

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 6,131

United_States     Kentucky

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:


Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere
Of course, my points exactly.



1) Hasan is a terrorist, and became a terrorist the moment he started indulging himself in militant jihadist AQ doctrines. He not only should have been removed from the military the moment his AQ sentiments, attempted contacts to AQers and jihadist sentiments were being noticed, but arrested as a terrorist the moment his intents were detected and given the law's severest sanctions in order to remove him from society as a terrorist.

2) I see it both as an issue of law enforcement and war. AQ and its thematic adherents are an immediate and material threat to US and global security, and criminals in the laws of nations (US included) as well as UN declarations and mandates declaring them to be so and legitimate targets for eradication.

I see guys like Hasan who start wanting to contact AQ and get involved in AQ militant Islamic thematics as enemies of the state no more than a person who would have gone out on December 8, 1941 until the war's conclusion making seditious speeches and threats of assistance and violence against the US and/or her allies in favour of Imperial Japan and seeking to court and/or render material aid, assitance, sabotage, etc, for Imperial Japan against the US and its allies.

And it's not just a matter of war. It's a matter of the domestic laws on their own merit too. None of that stuff is protected speech in my view under the First Amendment. Some of the rhetoric is an act as well as speech, and regardless, encouraging and calling for violence and sedition is not protected--and it is and should be criminal--and prosecuted to the fullest extents of the law to remove all such people who pose a threat to the peace and welfare of the US and others.
There is the US Sedition Act of 1918, but I think it was only enforced once:

Sedition Act of 1918 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to the article the person against whom it was enforced ran for president even though he had lost his citizenship and got almost 1 million votes.
__________________
Education is.....man's going forward from cocksure ignorance to thoughtful uncertainty. -Kenneth G. Johnson


Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air… - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply With Quote
  #563 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
John Drake's Avatar
Secretary of State
The Last Eisenhower Republican

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 5,286

   
Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunshine View Post
So what you are suggesting that this entire discussion board should shut down just to get rid of YOU!
If it would get rid of him I'd consider it a fair bargain. Unfortunately, he'd just find another poor group to inflict himself on..
__________________
Alizee Jacotay, the reason god invented hips
Reply With Quote
  #564 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania/Ireland
Posts: 10,209

Pennsylvania     Ireland

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunshine View Post
There is the US Sedition Act of 1918, but I think it was only enforced once:

Sedition Act of 1918 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

According to the article the person against whom it was enforced ran for president even though he had lost his citizenship and got almost 1 million votes.
Hehe, true. Sedition has long been deemed unprotected speech, but there has been overreaching in statutes from time to time that are overbroad and attempt to include protected speech on account of emotional overreactions, fear, flagwaiving political appeals by politicians playing that card, etc. But the law and law enforcement should spend its time just getting it right for the right aims.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #565 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania/Ireland
Posts: 10,209

Pennsylvania     Ireland

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
Okay then....... make sure you stay focused and don't 'go wobbly' on me.
Hehe, I've never been 'wobbly' on this topic. I have always been focused on how best to address it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #566 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania/Ireland
Posts: 10,209

Pennsylvania     Ireland

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
The key problem here is that I think even "seditious" speech IS protected. You can call to kill ALL the Jews legally, but if you calll to kill Rabbi X then no.

Also, conspriracy involves an "overt act". Now in the movie, the Stalking WAS an overt act. If this guy had started following officers home.... but he didn't. . . .
Sedition isn't protected speech, and courts have long held that since the beginning. The questions have turned on what rightly is considered unprotected seditious speech and what is not, though.

Hasan is a military officer, and seditious speech by military personnel has long been prohibited under the UCMJ given the particular duties and oaths taken by the military:

Quote:
§ 894. Art. 94. Mutiny or sedition

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10...4----000-.html

In the civilian sphere, the SCOTUS has held that the First Amendment protects radical and revolutionary speech unless it poses a "clear and present danger," that meaning that people must be encouraged to do something, rather than merely to believe in something.

The same patterns fall within the 'fighting words' incitement to violence being unpotected speech, of which much of sedition also falls as a subcategory thereof.

So, seeking to instigate people to kill all the Jews or anyone else is not protected. It's an encouragement to others to do so, is an overt act, and not a mere expression of one's own belief in academic fashion.

In fact, it would flip the example on its head to allow otherwise. An illegal attempt to instigate others to kill a Rabbi because he's a Jew does not become legalised by making a far more comprehensive instigation of killing him along with all other Jews. That's not a whitewash into legality--it's the attempt to instigate a mass murder/holocaust, that Rabbi included within.
__________________

Last edited by O'Sullivan Bere; 11-11-2009 at 01:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #567 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pennsylvania/Ireland
Posts: 10,209

Pennsylvania     Ireland

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
. . . More and more it's being shown that there is just no way society can protect itself from people who just go nuts. (Well, there is one, but I don't want to get into that here) What motivated that guy who killed the little Amish girls? Is there some sort of anti-Amish plot going on? Do we need to arrest all the many PA motorists who say their buggies should have better lighting? Or are we finally going to admit that Crazy People sometimes do things for Reasons We Would Find Not To Make Sense.
This isn't an issue that should be punted because of the lack of perfection in guarding against it, especially so when conduct is openly detected. Sure, you'll get some loner who'll commit an atrocity like at the Amish school (which was right near me and I saw the aftermath). But that guy was a lone crackpot who made no overt comments about what he intended to do. On the other hand, some of the types I cited on this thread--like those of Revolution Muslim--are publicly open in their callings and intents. And it certainly really has no comparison to an academic expression like thinking the Amish buggies ought to have better lighting, which would be a constructively intended road safety concern suggestion, the very opposite of fighting words and incitement to violence.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #568 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 23,785

United_States    
Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

well, looks like they had their 'suspiscions...jesus christ.



Walter Reed Officials Asked: Was Hasan Psychotic?

When a group of key officials gathered in the spring of 2008 for their monthly meeting in a Bethesda, Md., office, one of the leading — and most perplexing — items on their agenda was: What should we do about Hasan?…


Both fellow students and faculty were deeply troubled by Hasan’s behavior — which they variously called disconnected, aloof, paranoid, belligerent, and schizoid. The officials say he antagonized some students and faculty by espousing what they perceived to be extremist Islamic views. His supervisors at Walter Reed had even reprimanded him for telling at least one patient that “Islam can save your soul.”…


One official involved in the conversations had reportedly told colleagues that he worried that if Hasan deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, he might leak secret military information to Islamic extremists. Another official reportedly wondered aloud to colleagues whether Hasan might be capable of committing fratricide, like the Muslim U.S. Army sergeant who, in 2003, killed two fellow soldiers and injured 14 others by setting off grenades at a base in Kuwait.


Walter Reed Officials Asked: Was Hasan Psychotic? : NPR
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #569 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2009
Richyrich03867's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,996

United_States     New_Hampshire

Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Yes his colleagues were concerned that Maj. Hasan was clinically pyschotic. The solution his superiors came up with? Reassign him to Fort Hood. Make him somebdy else's problem. Kinda like when the Archdiocese of the Catholic Church would reassign a priest when rumors of altar-boy buggery began to circulate.
__________________
"He writes the worst English that I have ever encountered. It reminds me of a string of wet sponges; it reminds me of tattered washing on the line; it reminds me of stale bean soup, of college yells, of dogs barking idiotically through endless nights. It is so bad that a sort of grandeur creeps into it." - H.L. Mencken on Warren Harding
Reply With Quote
  #570 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 23,785

United_States    
Re: 12 dead, 31 injured in Fort Hood shooting

Quote:
Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
Hehe, I've never been 'wobbly' on this topic. I have always been focused on how best to address it.
yeaaaaaa well, seemed to me you got shaky under questioning...you would not stand up to a good water boarding...
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online