Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Information and Research > Science and Technology

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2007
soot's Avatar
soot soot is offline
U.S. Senator

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: N.J.
Posts: 750

United_States     New_Jersey

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedyer View Post
Then there is Intergalactic travel, or traveling between two galaxies. Now that's really tricky, even impossible as far as we know. Unless of course you can find a short-cut, which are wormholes. That I'll leave alone, as I'm no expert in physics and boy thats just a can of worms I really can't comment on.
Traversing theoretical wormholes can also be described as really tricky, even impossible.

Assuming they exist at all, which we don't know, it's been proven for a number of the equations for which they are a viable solution that either entering, exiting, or both, would be physically impossible.

In the end, wormholes are about as valid a solution as fairy godmothers.
__________________
...Old Europe, a once-dominant region now reduced to sucking at the geopolitical teat of America... they spent the better part of the last millennium conquering the world and taking the good stuff home with them... And what do they get for their troubles? Ungrateful colonies demanding their independence. And after you taught them how to play cricket!...

-Jon Stewart
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
DGG's Avatar
DGG DGG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,808

Sweden    
Re: What is the point?

I believe mankind will scatter around the "local" parts of the Galaxy with that which is called "generation starships" in science fiction. That is starships with a miniature eco system on board where humans will live for generations to come before they come across a planet good enough for terraformation. Then the terraformation will take a lot of time, as well, during which the humans will still live in the generation starship. I just wonder what it would be like for the first generation that will go to live on that new planet.
__________________
President Josiah Bartlet: Sweden has a 100% literacy rate. 100%! How do they do that?
Leo McGarry: Maybe they don't and they can't add.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Tethys Tethys is offline
Eternal optimist

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,988

Earth     Australia

Re: What is the point?

Okay, another round-up…

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
So why don't you tell us which part of the quote details the justification for doing it in the first place?
The quote is abstract. You grasp its sense - or you don’t.

Did you even bother to read Kennedy’s two speeches in their entirety? I posted the links. Even the most quotable quotes are better read in full textual context, and with a modicum of knowledge of the historical and social background in which they were spoken or written.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scribbler1 View Post
I have a slightly different take on this great "because it is hard" debate. I think it was a cross between what Steve said above, meaning stereotypical Americans don't shrink from a tough job, but it's also the fact that there is enormous satisaction from succeeding at something tough (not to mention bragging rights), and demonstrating the so-called "can do" attitude we Americans are supposed to possess.

"It's a tough job? No sweat, we LIKE it tough!" Kind of like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Exactly.

It's nice to see that the obvious is only lost on some people here...
Pretty much agree, Scribbler1 and Steve, but I’ll add my thoughts here, as read by a non-American.

Yes, I would say that most people in the world viewed and admired the missions to the Moon as a demonstration of “American can do”.

And certainly Americans have bragging rights here.

To my mind, however, Kennedy’s words did more than articulate an American philosophy of endeavour.

His words and vision inspired people across the world, in that this idea of progressing through challenge has universal relevance.

This was American leadership in every way

Quote:
Originally Posted by soot View Post
Traversing theoretical wormholes can also be described as really tricky, even impossible.

Assuming they exist at all, which we don't know, it's been proven for a number of the equations for which they are a viable solution that either entering, exiting, or both, would be physically impossible.

In the end, wormholes are about as valid a solution as fairy godmothers.
Shucks, Soot, don’t go spoiling my Trekkie fantasies with physics and all that…

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGG View Post
I believe mankind will scatter around the "local" parts of the Galaxy with that which is called "generation starships" in science fiction. That is starships with a miniature eco system on board where humans will live for generations to come before they come across a planet good enough for terraformation. Then the terraformation will take a lot of time, as well, during which the humans will still live in the generation starship. I just wonder what it would be like for the first generation that will go to live on that new planet.
I think there may be scope for terraforming Mars in the future. But, if we develop the capacity to undertake inter-stellar travel in our galaxy, whether we do it with "generation starships" or by some other means, wouldn’t we seek an be likely to find Earth-like planets (like the “Class-M planets in Star Trek)?

Yes, it is interesting to contemplate what it would be like to live on a new planet. Perhaps not that much different to what it was like for the pioneers in the US or new settlers in Australia, though I hope we don’t go colonising inhabited worlds. In the end, I think the “new world” novelty would fade in the background. Wherever humans are, wherever humans go, I guess it does not change much the way we relate to each other, or our day-to-day life.

Tethys
__________________
Quote:
We shall never be able to remove suspicion and fear as potential causes of war until communication is permitted to flow, free and open, across international
boundaries.
-- Harry S. Truman
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,964

United_States     Russian

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
What's there to argue? Kennedy said he wanted us to go to the moon, and that we shouldn't let difficulty be the one thing that stood in our way.

Do you think we should've not done it? What's your position? Why have you reached such a conclusion?
Becyase I make a conclusion, I want to hear the reasoning for why it was done.
Quote:
This is another example of your childish "debating" techniques. You'll not fully state your position and present why you believe as you do, but you're quick to demand that of others.

Let's discuss it. As you've posted in this thread that there was a "lack of reason" to do it, please explain why you believe that...
Actually, I was commenting on the quote when I said that.

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard,"

It doesn't provide a reason except that "it is hard."
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,964

United_States     Russian

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tethys View Post
Okay, another round-up…



The quote is abstract. You grasp its sense - or you don’t.

Did you even bother to read Kennedy’s two speeches in their entirety? I posted the links. Even the most quotable quotes are better read in full textual context, and with a modicum of knowledge of the historical and social background in which they were spoken or written.





Pretty much agree, Scribbler1 and Steve, but I’ll add my thoughts here, as read by a non-American.

Yes, I would say that most people in the world viewed and admired the missions to the Moon as a demonstration of “American can do”.
If what scribbler said is the meaning, then I have to say, it is a pretty stupid thing to say. Yes, let's waste billions of dollars in resources on something just because it is hard. I guess it's okay when you are spending someone else's money.
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12,748

   
Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Becyase I make a conclusion, I want to hear the reasoning for why it was done.

Actually, I was commenting on the quote when I said that.

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard,"

It doesn't provide a reason except that "it is hard."
Slon, are you gearing up to argue that we shouldn't have gone to the moon?
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,964

United_States     Russian

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Slon, are you gearing up to argue that we shouldn't have gone to the moon?
All I did was discuss the quote, Steve.
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12,748

   
Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
All I did was discuss the quote, Steve.
Good. So have we.

Guess you're done then, thanks...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
soot's Avatar
soot soot is offline
U.S. Senator

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: N.J.
Posts: 750

United_States     New_Jersey

Re: What is the point?

Deleted - double tap.
__________________
...Old Europe, a once-dominant region now reduced to sucking at the geopolitical teat of America... they spent the better part of the last millennium conquering the world and taking the good stuff home with them... And what do they get for their troubles? Ungrateful colonies demanding their independence. And after you taught them how to play cricket!...

-Jon Stewart

Last edited by soot; 10-01-2007 at 12:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
soot's Avatar
soot soot is offline
U.S. Senator

 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: N.J.
Posts: 750

United_States     New_Jersey

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGG View Post
I believe mankind will scatter around the "local" parts of the Galaxy with that which is called "generation starships" in science fiction. That is starships with a miniature eco system on board where humans will live for generations to come before they come across a planet good enough for terraformation. Then the terraformation will take a lot of time, as well, during which the humans will still live in the generation starship. I just wonder what it would be like for the first generation that will go to live on that new planet.
That's an interesting concept and it got me thinking.

Since there are no habitable planets in the "local' regions of the solar system we're talking about a voyage over vast distances requiring tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of years.

That's just taking into account the voyage from here to a hypothetical "there" (and completly ignoring the facts we don't have the faintest idea where to go or how to go about getting there).

But for the sake of argument let's say that we have a realistic destination a few hundred thousand lightyears away and a means of getting there in whaat we'll call a first-generation, generation-starship.

Again, we're dealing with timescales, in the simple transit alone, that exced the the entire timespan of terestrial human civilazation, possibly by several orders of magnitude.

How will we prevent "wars" onboard our spacecraft? We haven't established, here on Earth, a system of governance or justice that provides for anything approaching "peace and security" in the long-term. Even the most ambitious and successful empires have only lasted a few hundred or a thousand years at the most, after which they generally devolve into a period of chaos. What makes us believe we can provide for the governance, management, and administration of a mobile "mini-civilization" that would have to be a few thousand members strong?

How will we keep the "residents" of our interstellar biosphere commited to the mission? Naturally the first generation will be, they signed on for it after all. How about the second generation, the third, the hundredth?

We don't know enough about genetics to selectively breed scientists and engineers and doctors and pilots. What if after the first twenty generations there is nothing on the spacecraft but actors and philosophers and acrobats and artists?

Sure there'll be an educational system organic to the spacecraft, but I'll tell you what, I'm a fairly bright guy (no genious but no dope either). I understand and enjoy law and politics and religion and human relations to a degree that many people would find incomprehensible and quite frankly ridiculous. But I'm fucked when it comes to math as elementary as logarithmic functions. There is no way I could be trained in the physical sciences, it's just over my head.

That's what your post got me thinking. Just think of all the problems we face here on Earth that we would, of inevitability, have to bring with us on a (relatively) small and cramped, scary, dangerous mission into the unknown.

I wonder if we have what it takes as a life form to accomplish what science may eventually be able to provide for?
__________________
...Old Europe, a once-dominant region now reduced to sucking at the geopolitical teat of America... they spent the better part of the last millennium conquering the world and taking the good stuff home with them... And what do they get for their troubles? Ungrateful colonies demanding their independence. And after you taught them how to play cricket!...

-Jon Stewart
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Scribbler1's Avatar
Scribbler1 Scribbler1 is offline
Secretary of State
Skeptical Patriot

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Delaware, USA, Earth
Posts: 4,945

United_States     Delaware

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tethys View Post
Pretty much agree, Scribbler1 and Steve, but I’ll add my thoughts here, as read by a non-American.

Yes, I would say that most people in the world viewed and admired the missions to the Moon as a demonstration of “American can do”.

And certainly Americans have bragging rights here.

To my mind, however, Kennedy’s words did more than articulate an American philosophy of endeavour.

His words and vision inspired people across the world, in that this idea of progressing through challenge has universal relevance.

This was American leadership in every way
Well said. Kennedy was a brilliant speaker.
Quote:
I think there may be scope for terraforming Mars in the future.
It appears to be a serious possibility. The problem I see is when the discussion turns to the time the Sun says lights out. When the Sun goes out, so does Mars along with Earth.
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Scribbler1's Avatar
Scribbler1 Scribbler1 is offline
Secretary of State
Skeptical Patriot

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Delaware, USA, Earth
Posts: 4,945

United_States     Delaware

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
If what scribbler said is the meaning, then I have to say, it is a pretty stupid thing to say. Yes, let's waste billions of dollars in resources on something just because it is hard. I guess it's okay when you are spending someone else's money.
Except for the fact that almost the whole country was behind the space program. To us back then, that WAS a good use for the money.
That, plus the fact that we felt letting the Soviet Union get there first and then claim the Moon for Mother Russia would have been unacceptable.

Besides, we HAVE been paid back in research and invention spun off from the space program.
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Scribbler1's Avatar
Scribbler1 Scribbler1 is offline
Secretary of State
Skeptical Patriot

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Delaware, USA, Earth
Posts: 4,945

United_States     Delaware

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by soot View Post
How will we prevent "wars" onboard our spacecraft? We haven't established, here on Earth, a system of governance or justice that provides for anything approaching "peace and security" in the long-term. Even the most ambitious and successful empires have only lasted a few hundred or a thousand years at the most, after which they generally devolve into a period of chaos. What makes us believe we can provide for the governance, management, and administration of a mobile "mini-civilization" that would have to be a few thousand members strong?
It seems to work well for the military, so the concept could be adjusted to have a military-style chain of command and certain rules in place that all the specially selected crew would agree to. And even if it were an American-style republic it could work with some minor adjustments as well. After all, the US has held together fairly well for 321 years so there's no reason to think a smaller version wouldn't work in space.
Quote:
How will we keep the "residents" of our interstellar biosphere commited to the mission? Naturally the first generation will be, they signed on for it after all. How about the second generation, the third, the hundredth?
That's easy. They won't be able to come back. That alone would keep ME pretty committed to the mission.
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,964

United_States     Russian

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Good. So have we.

Guess you're done then, thanks...
Sorry, Steve, but you're not a moderator, so you can't close threads. I'll discuss as long as I want to and can.
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 10-01-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,964

United_States     Russian

Re: What is the point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scribbler1 View Post
Except for the fact that almost the whole country was behind the space program. To us back then, that WAS a good use for the money.
Then they should have financed it privately.
Quote:
That, plus the fact that we felt letting the Soviet Union get there first and then claim the Moon for Mother Russia would have been unacceptable.
What exactly does putting a flag on the moon do? "Claiming" it? How do you claim it if you can't live there and defend it? What difference does it make?
Quote:
Besides, we HAVE been paid back in research and invention spun off from the space program.
Are you saying it could not have been done privately or without going to space/to the moon?
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes