WELFARE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

PERIOD.

EXPLANATION POINT !

if you think welfare is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, wait till you get a load of Obamas tax 'credits'...you aint seen nothing yet dude.

__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor

Providing for the general Welfare of the United States is a specifically enumerated general power delegated to the general government of the Union.

The power to fix the weights and measures of official poverty is also delegated to our federal government.

Simply ensuring the solvency of any state welfare schemes could ensure the full faith and credit of those public acts by the general government of the Union.

Better compliance with at-will employment doctrine and state at-will employment laws could provide a simpler mechanism for ensuring the efficacy of any such scheme.

I have noticed a trend with government expanding when Republicans get their hands on it.

__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004

A simpler method to distribute income is better compliance with at-will employment doctrine. Unemployment compensation is already an established bureaucracy and department.

Welfare, as we currently know it, could be phased out by attrition.

What do you think of the concept of public sector ownership of "means of production"? These types of public sector business ventures can improve our standard of living while generating revenue that can defray public sector costs.

I subscribe to the point of view that the general government of our Union is legally, morally, and ethically obligated to provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States. Does anyone want to discuss the perspective that states should be able to enact public policies of zero percent official poverty and feel a sense of entitlement to the full faith and credit of the United States; and, potential states' right.