Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > State & Local Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Marcus1124 Marcus1124 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 4,864

   
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
jviehe
Thats a convinient simplification, but the truth lies more in the middle. FEMA and Bushs problems were compounded by the total stupidity of New Orleans. Build a city in a bowl, pour water on it, then complain when someone cant adequetaly stop the water from getting in, or figure out how to resuce people who shouldnt have been there in the first place.
I think it was rather the other way around, FEMA and Bush were faced with the problem of having to deal with a situation that was not only exacerbated by, but mostly caused by the incompetence of some at the state and local level.

Take the people "trapped" at the stadium. First of all, it was the assigned place for people to go in the event of just such a catastrophe, they were not "trapped" there. The issue then became lack of supplies, which is completely a state and local responsibility. It was the responsibility of the city and state government to ensure that designated areas for people to go in such a situation would be sufficiently stocked with food, water, and medications. FEMA was critized for taking a few days to do what all the planning expected them to take a few days to do, the only reason them not doing their job BETTER than expected was that the state and local authorities utterly failed to do their's.

I will say it again, Blanco's hysterical and thoughtless "send everything you've got" message was irresponsible, selfish, and merely underscored her own incompetence.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
solletica's Avatar
solletica solletica is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,925

   
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
I think it was rather the other way around, FEMA and Bush were faced with the problem of having to deal with a situation that was not only exacerbated by, but mostly caused by the incompetence of some at the state and local level.
since when does the Federal government need permission from state/local officials to take action?

FEMA officials: "We're here to help."

State/Local official officials: "No, you don't have the proper authorization."



Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
Take the people "trapped" at the stadium. First of all, it was the assigned place for people to go in the event of just such a catastrophe, they were not "trapped" there. The issue then became lack of supplies, which is completely a state and local responsibility.
The stadium was inadequate as a shelter given the scope of the disaster, underscoring what I already stated: that NOLA's own municipal resources were insufficient.

State/local officials didn't do everything they could, but even if they had, federal assistance would've been required. And if the local officials failed, the feds were perfectly welcome to take control of the situation, i. e. in the absence of leadership, provide leadership.

But it goes without saying that if anyone in NOLA asked for federal assistance, the US govt., under Bush, would've ignored them.

And to be fair, I myself and pretty much everyone in the country is partially responsible for the disaster. Given the substantial foreign interest in the welfare of NOLA (as one of the only places in the US w/a glaringly distinct ethno-cultural heritage),

anyone one of us could've started a fund to pay for patching the city's levees, but none of us did . But it's not too late. If the GOP-controlled state govt. in LA continues to neglect NOLA's reconstruction, I'm sure any of us can take action.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
I will say it again, Blanco's hysterical and thoughtless "send everything you've got" message was irresponsible, selfish, and merely underscored her own incompetence.
Blanco was a fool, but I doubt Jindal, had he been governor at the time, would've done any better.
__________________
Life only becomes meaningful at its extremes

-- S
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
mudwhistle mudwhistle is offline
Secretary of Defense
Not A Poser

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 2,709
Blog Entries: 11

United_States     Montana

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by solletica View Post
But don't let facts like this get in the way of a good "lefties coddle lazy bums" rant

(IMHO, nothing tops the Dan Quayle comment about how there's no unemployment when McDonald's has "Now Hiring" signs on its windows)

Nevertheless, three years after the disaster, GOPers fail to acknowledge the fact that the tragedy of Katrina was compounded by irresponsible leadership, including at the federal level. While Katrina happened, bush and FEMA slept (as well as the NOLA mayor and Gov. Blanco, of course).

The argument that the responsibility lied entirely with NOLA is bogus. NOLA, by itself, did not have the resources to cope with the disaster, even if Nagin had done a Guilianiesque job of handling the crisis. Even more pathetic is that several other nations volunteered assistance (money, ships), that were turned away by the idiot Bush regime.

But nothing can excuse the fact that Bush and his minions failed to do anything to patch the levies that protected NOLA.

The strong likelihood of a Katrina-type disaster was known years in advance, yet no one acted.

The $$ spent on the silly "War on Terror" would've been more than adequate to reinforce or rebuild the city's levies. Of course, every other administration in the past could've done the same thing. All of them failed. Katrina was a time when NOLA and the nation needed leadership, and none was available.

Katrina started a new trend............dumb-ass irresponsible state and local officials were able to blame their shortcomings on the feds and they got all the help in the world from the MSM to do it.

But the truth is by law the feds can't step in until they are invited first. It is against the law. Posse Comitatus:
Quote:
The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction. The Act prohibits most members of the federal uniformed services (the Army, Air Force, and State National Guard forces when such are called into federal service) from exercising nominally state law enforcement police or peace officer powers that maintain "law and order" on non-federal property (states, their counties and municipal divisions) in the former Confederate states.

The statute generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the United States National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Coast Guard is exempt from the Posse Comitatus Act.

The Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act substantially limit the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement.



On September 26, 2006, President Bush urged Congress to consider revising federal laws so that the U.S. military could seize control immediately in the aftermath of a natural disaster, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

These changes were repealed in their entirety in 2008.

Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________


“The only thing standing between Joe Biden and the presidency is his mouth.”

- Michele Malkin
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Si modo's Avatar
Si modo Si modo is offline
In a Garden of Eden
Buckeye by birth; Boilermaker by choice

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 9,738
Blog Entries: 1

United_States    
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Well, they did choose to live near a river that could flood.
As Mrs. M said, there is risk pretty much where ever one lives. To me, the difference is that there are not inept mouthpieces (like Nagin) hounding the camera, blaming everyone else, and accepting no share of the blame (good strategy). It got the population torqued up enough and the folks in NO got megadollars of much needed aid (forget about the other Gulf areas that got whacked, too). The Midwesterners need help, too and the Red Cross' balance is zero.
__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them, speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 17,932

   
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

I think the more interesting question raised here (and by Katrina) is how disaster management should be delegated at the state/federal levels. Off the top of my head, I'm inclined to suggest that more responsibility be placed on the state and local municipalities. I think that this helps prevent unfairness in terms of where people opt to live. If you move somewhere that gets pounded by hurricanes/floods/tornadoes/earthquakes routinely, state/local taxes ought to be higher there to account for disaster management than somewhere with relatively few disasters. Or, perhaps there could be some give and take - the feds will step in, but you're running a tab to eventually be repaid from state/local taxes.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 12,972

United_States     Texas

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

The only problem with that of course is what about folks who are born there and live there from birth with no possibility of moving?

Its a bit harsh on them, no?
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
mudwhistle mudwhistle is offline
Secretary of Defense
Not A Poser

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 2,709
Blog Entries: 11

United_States     Montana

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I think the more interesting question raised here (and by Katrina) is how disaster management should be delegated at the state/federal levels. Off the top of my head, I'm inclined to suggest that more responsibility be placed on the state and local municipalities. I think that this helps prevent unfairness in terms of where people opt to live. If you move somewhere that gets pounded by hurricanes/floods/tornadoes/earthquakes routinely, state/local taxes ought to be higher there to account for disaster management than somewhere with relatively few disasters. Or, perhaps there could be some give and take - the feds will step in, but you're running a tab to eventually be repaid from state/local taxes.

Now you're getting into states rights issues.

Truth be told, Congress last week passed a bill authorizing federal insurance to cover the costs insurance providers pay to disaster victims.

So much for working on paying down the debt.
__________________


“The only thing standing between Joe Biden and the presidency is his mouth.”

- Michele Malkin
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Marcus1124 Marcus1124 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 4,864

   
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
solletica
The stadium was inadequate as a shelter given the scope of the disaster, underscoring what I already stated: that NOLA's own municipal resources were insufficient.
The stadium was not inadequate given the scope of the disaster, the stadium was a MORE than adequate facility, what was lacking was the basic SUPPLIES which was the responsibility of the state and local government, and that was NOT a result of insufficient resources, it was a result of incompetent planning and governance.

Quote:
solletica
State/local officials didn't do everything they could, but even if they had, federal assistance would've been required. And if the local officials failed, the feds were perfectly welcome to take control of the situation, i. e. in the absence of leadership, provide leadership.
Nobody is blaming the state/local officials for failing to do "everything they could", I am taking them to task for failing to do what they COULD AND WERE SUPPOSED TO DO. There is NO excuse for not having a designated relief facility stocked for providing relief. This is a basic matter of planning ahead.

And the Federal Government DID provide exactly the assitance it was SUPPOSED to. It is just unfortunate that the media allowed the Federal response to get tarnished for not picking up the slack of incompetent state and local governments when it had an unprecedented level of need across MANY states.

Quote:
solletica
But it goes without saying that if anyone in NOLA asked for federal assistance, the US govt., under Bush, would've ignored them.
That just demonstrates sheer ignorance of reality. The U.S. government under Bush gave them TREMENDOUS assistance. What they U.S. government under Bush did NOT do was to 'send them everything they had', and screweing the people of states who were JUST as much in need, but whose own state and local agencies hadn't dropped the ball.

Quote:
solletica
And to be fair, I myself and pretty much everyone in the country is partially responsible for the disaster. Given the substantial foreign interest in the welfare of NOLA (as one of the only places in the US w/a glaringly distinct ethno-cultural heritage),
Nonesense, nobody is in any way responsible for the disaster (it was a hurricane). I couldn't care less about New Orleans, and shouldn't be expected to bear the cost of other's choices to live there.

Quote:
solletica
anyone one of us could've started a fund to pay for patching the city's levees, but none of us did . But it's not too late. If the GOP-controlled state govt. in LA continues to neglect NOLA's reconstruction, I'm sure any of us can take action.
How about the people of New Orlean's starting a fund to pay for their own friggin' levees? One would think that nobody has a more vested interest in doing so than the people living in the big below-sea level bowl? If they don't care enough about it to do a damn thing (like at least voting out of office the incompotent fool Nagin) why should I waste my time and resources which can be far better devoted to useful and deserving pursuits.
__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Madam of the B'day Girls
Just call me Sugah!

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,256

United_States     Louisiana

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
I think it was rather the other way around, FEMA and Bush were faced with the problem of having to deal with a situation that was not only exacerbated by, but mostly caused by the incompetence of some at the state and local level.

Take the people "trapped" at the stadium. First of all, it was the assigned place for people to go in the event of just such a catastrophe, they were not "trapped" there. The issue then became lack of supplies, which is completely a state and local responsibility. It was the responsibility of the city and state government to ensure that designated areas for people to go in such a situation would be sufficiently stocked with food, water, and medications. FEMA was critized for taking a few days to do what all the planning expected them to take a few days to do, the only reason them not doing their job BETTER than expected was that the state and local authorities utterly failed to do their's.

I will say it again, Blanco's hysterical and thoughtless "send everything you've got" message was irresponsible, selfish, and merely underscored her own incompetence.
Actually, the Superdome wasn't suppose to be a shelter of last resort but as usual, it ended up that way. I fault Nagin for not realizing from the past that this would happen. Had he done so, he could have done just as you said, stocked food, water and other emergency supplies but he's a total idiot!!!
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chardonnay in one hand, chocolate in the other, body
thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO, what a ride!'"


Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Madam of the B'day Girls
Just call me Sugah!

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,256

United_States     Louisiana

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by solletica View Post
What city is that?
Slidell, located on the north shore of Lake Pontchartrain, which btw, was hit by the western part of the eye. (The eye missed N.O.)
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chardonnay in one hand, chocolate in the other, body
thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO, what a ride!'"


Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Madam of the B'day Girls
Just call me Sugah!

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,256

United_States     Louisiana

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by solletica View Post
since when does the Federal government need permission from state/local officials to take action?

FEMA officials: "We're here to help."

State/Local official officials: "No, you don't have the proper authorization."

The feds can't just walk in without state request. What high school did you go to????



Quote:
The stadium was inadequate as a shelter given the scope of the disaster, underscoring what I already stated: that NOLA's own municipal resources were insufficient.
The stadium could very well have been an adequate shelter but the officials chose NOT to use it as such in hopes of getting people to leave. Common sense and past experience should have been enough for them to realize that people tend to be idiots and would end up at the Dome.

Quote:
State/local officials didn't do everything they could, but even if they had, federal assistance would've been required. And if the local officials failed, the feds were perfectly welcome to take control of the situation, i. e. in the absence of leadership, provide leadership.

But it goes without saying that if anyone in NOLA asked for federal assistance, the US govt., under Bush, would've ignored them.
That's total fucking bullshit.

Quote:
And to be fair, I myself and pretty much everyone in the country is partially responsible for the disaster. Given the substantial foreign interest in the welfare of NOLA (as one of the only places in the US w/a glaringly distinct ethno-cultural heritage),
The people responsible for the levee breaks are the Army Corps of Engineers and the New Orleans Levee Board.

Quote:
anyone one of us could've started a fund to pay for patching the city's levees, but none of us did . But it's not too late. If the GOP-controlled state govt. in LA continues to neglect NOLA's reconstruction, I'm sure any of us can take action.
It's not that the money wasn't there but rather the lack of inspections of the levees. Nobody is neglecting N.O.'s reconstruction but N.O. themselves.


Quote:
Blanco was a fool, but I doubt Jindal, had he been governor at the time, would've done any better.
Blanco's a total idiot and her smartest move would have been to call the President, ask for an immediate pardon of Edwin Edwards and then get the hell out of the way and let him run the state.

There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that Bobby Jindal would have done a much better job than Blanco. He's not an idiot!
__________________
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chardonnay in one hand, chocolate in the other, body
thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming 'WOO HOO, what a ride!'"


Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008
sneddog sneddog is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 343

   
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I think a big difference is that you don't have people stranded on root tops and in horrible conditions waiting for help that isn't showing up. Maybe there just isn't any major failures by federal agencies to report this time around. How do you know that nobody in New Orleans worked hard during the aftermath? I'm sure that some did but it just wasn't the biggest story in the incident worth reporting. Also this hasn't hit nearly a city with nearly as high a population and isn't as famous of a land mark.
Get real! The Katrina victims had plenty of warning and were told to evacuate, they didn't. So whose to blame for their plite?

The contrast between these two events is striking but only in the attitudes of those affected and only in one city New Orleans.

I hate hypocracy and I have no respect for people who think they are entitled.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008
Oreo Oreo is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 888

   
Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
The major difference between the floods in Iowa and Katrina is scope.
The damage in Iowa is limited to the area immediately adjacent to the river, a mile away from the river, it's just a rain storm.
Katrina covered a huge area, and did damage on a huge scale, in Iowa the damage is limited to a relatively small area, with functioning emergency services, food and shelter just a short distance from the disaster area, and relatively small numbers of people affected.
The author has a good point. Not only floods but the entire town of Greenland, Kansas was completed wiped out in 2007. The townspeople pulled together & are putting things back, this time green.

They didn't point their fingers at the government or the Bush administration, didn't come up with some conspiracy theory that Bush sent the F-5 upon them, (while some residents of New Orleans said it was Bush that broke the levies), etc. etc.

It is a difference in culture--from those hard working Americans that always pick up & go on, versus people who have had a government hand-out all their lives.

One of our contractors went to New Orleans to help re-build. The problem he has is that hardly anyone down there had homeowner insurance policies. So they sit back & blame the government or should I say the taxpayers of this country to re-build for them.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008
mudwhistle's Avatar
mudwhistle mudwhistle is offline
Secretary of Defense
Not A Poser

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 2,709
Blog Entries: 11

United_States     Montana

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oreo View Post
The author has a good point. Not only floods but the entire town of Greenland, Kansas was completed wiped out in 2007. The townspeople pulled together & are putting things back, this time green.

They didn't point their fingers at the government or the Bush administration, didn't come up with some conspiracy theory that Bush sent the F-5 upon them, (while some residents of New Orleans said it was Bush that broke the levies), etc. etc.

It is a difference in culture--from those hard working Americans that always pick up & go on, versus people who have had a government hand-out all their lives.

One of our contractors went to New Orleans to help re-build. The problem he has is that hardly anyone down there had homeowner insurance policies. So they sit back & blame the government or should I say the taxpayers of this country to re-build for them.
Repeat: Congress last week passed a bill authorizing federal insurance to cover the costs insurance providers pay to disaster victims. I'm not sure exactly what this covers, but my guess is it even covers Katrina victims who didn't have insurance. The Dems have a sneaky habit of putting hidden provisions in their bills that are unpopular.
__________________


“The only thing standing between Joe Biden and the presidency is his mouth.”

- Michele Malkin
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008
AwareAndiCare's Avatar
AwareAndiCare AwareAndiCare is offline
County Council Member
Spiritual Intelligence Please

 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 293

United_States     Portugal

Re: What Is The Difference Between The Floods In Iowa And Floods In New Orleans?

The obvious difference was one was forcasted days in advance while the other came with no warning. I see a great ineptitude between government and common sense, I don't understand the mental attitude days before this storm. Why didn't people and organizations like nursing homes leave? I live on the east coast on the ocean if we have a cat 3 i am getting out of here. People that could not move i can understand, those that had legs and means that stayed were warned, its unfortunate but in the long run their own fault.
Reply With Quote
Reply