Who sees ads in the middle of threads?

[pramjockey]

Originally Posted by moon

pramjockey;


More sycophantic tripe. I made a site suggestion, namely free membership for long-term supporters. Nowhere did I suggest a solely personal advantage and your attack is unwarranted.

With your statements as seen below, it's clear that you believe that somehow Marc owes you a website upon which you can post, and that you can dictate the layout.

Calling you on your bullshit (and it's a never-ending stream) is not sycophantic, although I'm sure your mom is so proud of you for being able to spell such a difficult word. It does, however, illustrate your amazing talent for hypocrisy.

Originally Posted by moon

PramJockey;


Hey, you pay it for me if you're so keen to be the site accountant.
I shouldn't start deciding who does and who doesn't have the right to be here though. It's just a tad outside your remit. Lol.


Still, now that the sycophants are lining up to cudgel other members for the effrontery of inoffensive freedom of speech, let's look at the logic of the proposal.

Ads are designed to make people buy stuff. They should be targeting those who have the wonga, namely, those who can afford to pay for membership. What's the point of ad-saturating those who can't afford membership, let alone purchasing the advertised material ?

I suggest then that 'paid up' members get the ad-saturation and the rest of us don't. Lol.

Originally Posted by moon

Hey, bully boys, I'm using the site for free and I don't like the ads. Accept it. You want to worsen my experience. Shame on you. Lol.


hermanboo ;


Oi, herman, I'm invited to comment on the ads.

I'll allow you the one cheap shot.

Care to comment ?

Originally Posted by moon

Good for you, but I ain't 'whining' so advance your vocabulary. The bawss asked for comment.

I'll tell you how I reached that conclusion. I was describing my own position, not speaking for anybody else. That should have been evident. I'll have to readjust my condescension for stragglers.

Otter;

Yes, if my appeal to the bawss fails and the site remains defaced that's exactly what I'll do. I've already stated my views on the financial problem elsewhere.

Originally Posted by moon

Some poor people can't do it, you know, they are compulsive buyers. There are maybe hundreds of families wrecked by this site's ill-advised venture into psyche-seducing advertising concentrations.

Still, if the bawss wants all those destitute trailer-park kids on his conscience at Christmas, well, that's up to him.

And shame on you people for not thinking of that. Shame.

[Steve]

You know what's funny?

Seeing some long, drawn out whiney liberal post, and right above it or below it is an ad with a big picture of Bill O'Reilly.

Fuckin' priceless...

[ViolaLee]

Originally Posted by Steve

You know what's funny?

Seeing some long, drawn out whiney liberal post, and right above it or below it is an ad with a big picture of Bill O'Reilly.

Fuckin' priceless...

Thank the goddess I don't have to see that.

[Steve]

Originally Posted by Samantha

Thank the goddess I don't have to see that.

Makes me laugh every time I see it...

[Donkey_Left]

I see the ads, but I don't really give a shit, cause I don't pay, so whatever.

I'd rather see some ads than some of the shit that I see posted though...

[Crystal]

Originally Posted by moon

Nice one. 'Counter extortion', I like that.

I've been meaning to suggest that anybody reaching 'Vice-President' status gets automatic free Silver membership with a Gold for the Prez.

How about it ?

( a date with Crystal preferred, but hey, beggars can't be choosers )

Reminds me of when I had this as my sig. There was no telling how many offers Marc and O'Sullivan recieved